- Discord
- COE#7110
If several alternate versions were to be created, I would entertain the notion of an alternate form of voting besides an up or down vote on a single proposal.
That version was chosen among several, not by the RA, but polls forumside and in-game. 20 TNPers voted forum-side and like 90 in-game. The in-game poll included the official arms, the forum-side poll didn't cause it's purpose was to decide which design to move here as a proposal.Crushing Our Enemies:If several alternate versions were to be created, I would entertain the notion of an alternate form of voting besides an up or down vote on a single proposal.
Just made this. What do you guys think?
Wow, I didn't realize the in-game poll was so lopsided! That's a big preference!Lennart:That version was chosen among several, not by the RA, but polls forumside and in-game. 20 TNPers voted forum-side and like 90 in-game. The in-game poll included the official arms, the forum-side poll didn't cause it's purpose was to decide which design to move here as a proposal.Crushing Our Enemies:If several alternate versions were to be created, I would entertain the notion of an alternate form of voting besides an up or down vote on a single proposal.
Evolution of the designs>> http://forum.thenorthpacific.org/topic/7439147
Forum-side poll>> http://forum.thenorthpacific.org/topic/7442456
In-game poll>> http://www.nationstates.net/page=poll/p=31676
Cheers
And you can tell by the WA voters that there's no so much puppet wanking involvedSillyString:Wow, I didn't realize the in-game poll was so lopsided! That's a big preference!Lennart:That version was chosen among several, not by the RA, but polls forumside and in-game. 20 TNPers voted forum-side and like 90 in-game. The in-game poll included the official arms, the forum-side poll didn't cause it's purpose was to decide which design to move here as a proposal.Crushing Our Enemies:If several alternate versions were to be created, I would entertain the notion of an alternate form of voting besides an up or down vote on a single proposal.
Evolution of the designs>> http://forum.thenorthpacific.org/topic/7439147
Forum-side poll>> http://forum.thenorthpacific.org/topic/7442456
In-game poll>> http://www.nationstates.net/page=poll/p=31676
Cheers
Look at the current coat of arms Grosse. It already has red in it. The red in the new one is not that much more (if at all) compared to the old one. The red was not added out of nowhere.Grosseschnauzer:get rid of the red, period, and use different shades of blue, as seas usually are in real life and I'll be much kinder about changes.
As to the star, it needs a context to show that it is Polaris, the North Star, perhaps with the tail end of the big dipper as much smaller stars.
Syrixia:Taking into account McM's post and the two posts after it, what if we were to, say, make a hybrid of Lennart's CoA and the original, using the sea colors, lack of the laurels, and the North Star from Lennart's and keeping everything else?
And if you guys like that idea, what do we do with the crown castle? Should we use the new or old variant? I think the new variant is a bit better; the old one definitely looks really 2005.
Elegarth:While I don't have any hard feelings towards the currently proposed symbols, I don't really find a need for changing something that is already symbolic... I am not always a fan of change and this is one of those cases.
Symbols should change only when the spirit of what they represent has changed so much that it is long gone... I'm weird like that I guess.
If we're going to make a change, then a star on a dark blue field, reflecting Polaris in the night sky, would be a vast improvementover having a star on a red field. JMO.mcmasterdonia:Look at the current coat of arms Grosse. It already has red in it. The red in the new one is not that much more (if at all) compared to the old one. The red was not added out of nowhere.Grosseschnauzer:get rid of the red, period, and use different shades of blue, as seas usually are in real life and I'll be much kinder about changes.
As to the star, it needs a context to show that it is Polaris, the North Star, perhaps with the tail end of the big dipper as much smaller stars.
The blue in the old coat of arms is not the colour of seas as they usually are either. The darker blue used by Lennart looks better IMO, others are free to disagree.
it's... exactly the same colourSillyString:Um.... the blue in the large seal looks more purple to me, and not the same as the (better) color on the flag. Can that be fixed?
#colorblindconfirmedLennart:it's... exactly the same colourSillyString:Um.... the blue in the large seal looks more purple to me, and not the same as the (better) color on the flag. Can that be fixed?
It may be monitor settings.Syrixia:#colorblindconfirmedLennart:it's... exactly the same colourSillyString:Um.... the blue in the large seal looks more purple to me, and not the same as the (better) color on the flag. Can that be fixed?
It may be because of color profiles. I haven't checked whether the file Lennart created is tagged. If it isn't, then I would strongly suggest that a color profile is added to it.Syrixia:#colorblindconfirmedLennart:it's... exactly the same colourSillyString:Um.... the blue in the large seal looks more purple to me, and not the same as the (better) color on the flag. Can that be fixed?
you rude little person*!Syrixia:#colorblindconfirmedLennart:it's... exactly the same colourSillyString:Um.... the blue in the large seal looks more purple to me, and not the same as the (better) color on the flag. Can that be fixed?
fixed, sorry and thanks Raven!Lord Ravenclaw:Um, can I give a friendly request that we don't call people "rude little bastard(s)" please? Joke or not, it's not exactly appropriate language. Thanks
Looks great!Lennart:Out curiosity, SillyString, if you have the time, do you see this one below the same as the ones above (slightly purplish)?
Also, Syrixia, there's no rush, I don't second this to a vote yet, I need a bit more input and maybe some more people can get involved.
Thanks everyone!