Cross-party consensus backs Chancellor's calls for Esthursia to "choose a different path" as party positions continue to drift
The "suppression of devolution" in Aubervijr and "of expression" in Prydania are not thought out for the long-term, says Chancellor Jeremy Wilson
Not particularly often do Esthursian governments make their statements, let alone publicly and clearly, on foreign policy; but following a week of "alarming headlines from our partners both in and out of Auroria", the Chancellor took the first part of Ministers' Askings to comment on the situation in Aubervijr and Prydania.
I would first like to state that as a Government, we are committed above all else - and this comes as a national, not a party political, principle - to safeguarding our Overlaw. Constitutional, or overlawly, affairs come above all else. Hence, when we discover that when other nations take steps - whether or not they be based on peoples' interests or not - to infringe their constitutions, it is often to the sorrow of future generations.
Prydania, as a good example of this, has legislation that would be bluntly unlawful here - and the amendments it seeks do not just fall short of ending extremism, but do not remove the white elephant; that Prydanian parties are not allowed to express republican sentiments. If our party, Speaker, had a branch in Prydania, it would be in principle outlawed. We not only understand what Prydania has gone through, but we urge them that this is legislation that jeopardises them in possible future generations if future monarchs do not wish to uphold the constitutional order installed broadly successfully in 2017, or even if future governments use it as a tool to misuse its power. This is not legislation to "strengthen", this is legislation that must be refined around its peoples' freedom of expression. Let me recite a quote from the late Forethegn Turnbrook, Speaker; those who grant too much power to their monarchies, regardless of their past virtues, do so to their descendants' regret; for you cannot choose your monarchs. Aubervijr has recently blocked attempts from its region, Faursia, to devolve power. As a nation who devolves powers to both its three Osynstric Ridings, and the other two Esthursian Ridings, we again will not be following this precedent; such a move here would risk the constitutional balance that our nation has built. We must choose a different path, whereby we can come together, both as a populace and as a democratic institution, to consolidate the Overlaw, and peoples' interests, and where we can not only respectfully disagree with our partners and friends in other nations, but show the world that another way exists. We love that so many in our world, including our own state, have embraced democracy - whether slowly or suddenly, of which Esthursia can claim to have done both - however we must use that democratic functioning to question the actions of our partners, in order that we remain distinct from the autocracies that continue far too plentifully into an era where they do not belong.
We are one of the few nations where unions have gained real power, and through it, another vehicle of democracy in the workplace built. One of the few nations where students can expect to be thanked and subsidised, not charged, for choosing to educate further. One of the few nations where new homeowners can expect to buy homes at similar real-terms costs to the last generation or two. One of the few nations where not only is healthcare ensured, but social care too. Having an Overlaw for 400 years, and building back as a united nation from the Classical Empire and its death throes of tyranny by anarchy; following our Overlaw wherever possible has granted us liberties envied by many and guarded our liberal democracy for future generations to enjoy and cherish. We are not perfect - we have regional divides, from the south-east and north to the west and centre; we have the scars from times of separatism or civil action; and having some degree of poverty is unavoidable to an extent. But we grow because we hold true to our Overlaw, and any use of these incidents to either abuse or misuse our power - whether the effects of unaccountability are felt now or in future generations, even by sheer chance - is not condoned here; and above all else, you are free to question what I say, publicly, through the ballot box, through association or privately, because your Overlaw provides that privilege - and no government should dream of compromising that.
Graham Ingley has also implicated himself in the debate over Prydania's 2017 legislation, calling it a "wonderful piece of legislation of which we should definitely have had here before it was too late", whilst the Conservatives and Liberals "broadly agreed with the sentiment of the Government on this matter", as the questioning moved onto military budgets and education benefits; with Rosemary Manning, a former human rights lawyer by career, hinting that "Ingley's law would find itself stricken from the record as unlawful in Esthursia". The Conservatives have continued to steadily drift towards moderate republicanism, although some within their ranks remain vocally opposed to the new order.
Edgard Alburgh, our chief political editor, had this to say on the matter, and on Esthursian politics in general:
You'll find, if you trawl through previous laws and legislation, that very few leaders - with the notable exception of Tharbjarn Einarsson - in the late 20th and 21st centuries dared to contravene the Overlaw, with its 1957 rewriting seeming to solidify its position even further. Similarly, Esthursia has often diverged paths deliberately from other democracies when our governments felt that their actions were wrong.
However, this has rarely been vocalised so publicly.
This is partly because Esthursian ideologies are now objectively different to many of their international counterparts. Esthursian social democracy is essentially a breed of somewhat paternalistic liberal socialism anywhere else, and has returned back to the position it was at before the left's global Third Way drift at the turn of the century. Esthursian liberalism continues to bleed into the centre-left, with social liberalism firmly replacing classical liberalism, and the Liberals' new leader being decisively left-of-centre. Esthursian conservatism continues to branch out, with the main branch being civic conservatism often being interpreted as liberal conservatism or even just simply liberalism in other nations; the soft-right, decidedly liberal conservative or one-nation conservative, is moderate compared to its counterparts to begin with. National conservatism here is fairly similar to its counterparts elsewhere, but the distance between itself and the mainstream electorate as well as the mainstream parties puts it a mile and a half away from power at all times.
As Esthursian ideologies follow an increasingly progressive electorate blindly, often breaking and ending with traditions such as anti-labour union legislation in conservatism or disarmament in socialism, they also diverge in many areas from their international counterparts. Although still individually distinct, liberalism and conservatism in Esthursia would confuse many onlookers from overseas.
The loss of connection between Esthursian politics and its international counterparts globally has given the Osborne government the chance to broadly push for "ideological separatism" - whereby Esthursia does things "its own way", and publicly. Graham Ingley is ironically the last bastion of international politics, in a broadly recognisable strand of national conservatism, in a country that has abandoned the ways of "the Western world" in the eyes of the electorate and mainstream parties.