McMasterdonia:One such matter will be a review of World Assembly Voting in the region that I will do in consultation with Abacathea.
I simply feel that there is a lot to do in very little time.New Charlzilla:Do you love the taste of power that you have right now, sir?
That was a joke! It was a stab at the West Pacific's undemocratic system and how they don't have an elected Delegate.Nierr:Does the delegate have an opinion on TNP citizens attempting to recruit for TNP in a fellow feeders legislature?
Gradea:That was a joke! It was a stab at the West Pacific's undemocratic system and how they don't have an elected Delegate.Nierr:Does the delegate have an opinion on TNP citizens attempting to recruit for TNP in a fellow feeders legislature?
Anyway, TRR is a sinker anyway.
Eluvatar:Yes, that it's imprudent and rude.
eSyrixia:How much would could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood that a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck chuckwood which is a wood that is specially made for woodchucks to chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood like chuckwood which a woodchuck can chuck?
iSyrixia:Or can it?
oSyrixia:How do we know that the woodchuck can chuck the chuckwood if the woodchuck cannot chuck wood?
uSyrixia:Or am I simply assuming the woodchuck cannot chuck wood?
ySyrixia:What if it could?
eSyrixia:And if it could, how much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
iSyrixia:Also, what is life?
Section 7.2 of the Codified Law of The North Pacific:5. Regional Officers may only be appointed and granted powers as explicitly allowed under this section.
6. The Serving Delegate may assign any Regional Power, with the exception of Border Control, to any Executive Officer.
7. The Serving Delegate may assign Border Control powers to any of the three members of the Security Council earliest in the Order of Succession.
8. In the event of a Delegate Emergency or with the permission of a majority vote of the Regional Assembly, the Delegate may assign Border Control powers to any members of the Security Council.
Considering you mentioned ministerial colleagues, I figured I would let you know here that if you need to meet with me today, I would like if it be scheduled for after 6 PM. Anytime before that I can't really commit to a detailed meeting.plembobria:This morning I had meetings with ministerial colleagues and others, and in addition to my duties in this house I shall have further such meetings later today.
May I first start with congratulating the rgt. hon. delegate on his victory in the election. I am sure you will prove as able as your predecessor. In the last days of your predecessor's reign it was noted that The North Pacific occupies almost all of the top 50 spots in a recent list of most World Assembly endorsements in the world. Further to this, it has also emerged that The North Pacific has 4th highest average endorsements in the entire world. Will he join me in praising the work of the World Assembly Development Program and the work done by his predecessors in growing the program and will he also confirm that the WADP will continue its fine work during his delegacy?plembobria:This morning I had meetings with ministerial colleagues and others, and in addition to my duties in this house I shall have further such meetings later today.
Zyvetskistaahn:I would like to ask in relation to the meanings of the votes a resident can make in the forum polls for World Assembly resolutions. Particularly, the meanings of "abstain" and of "present". On discord, a while ago, you mentioned that "abstain" was to mean that the resident was themselves abstaining and that "present" was to mean that the resident wished the Delegate to abstain.
A number of people, including myself, noted that it had historically been understood to be the other way around. I am not aware of any statement or announcement changing that understanding, so I would like to ask for one to be made (if the intention is to change it) or to be directed to a statement or announcement on changing it (if I have missed one).
Upon looking, it seems there does not exist any such section, let alone clause. Do you happen to mean Section 7.5, clause 33 of the Legal Code?Zyvetskistaahn:Further, I should like to ask the Delegate's view as to whether Section 5.6, clause 33 applies to the discussions had within the executive Ministries which may have their own private archives.
Zyvetskistaahn:I should like to ask the Delegate as to whether there were any discussions of the Cabinet which concluded between 15th November 2015 and 26th January 2016, and, if so, whether they will be disclosed to the appropriate archive.
Further, I should like to ask the Delegate's view as to whether Section 5.6, clause 33 applies to the discussions had within the executive Ministries which may have their own private archives.
Darcania:Upon looking, it seems there does not exist any such section, let alone clause. Do you happen to mean Section 7.5, clause 33 of the Legal Code?Zyvetskistaahn:Further, I should like to ask the Delegate's view as to whether Section 5.6, clause 33 applies to the discussions had within the executive Ministries which may have their own private archives.
plembobria:Zyvetskistaahn:I should like to ask the Delegate as to whether there were any discussions of the Cabinet which concluded between 15th November 2015 and 26th January 2016, and, if so, whether they will be disclosed to the appropriate archive.
Further, I should like to ask the Delegate's view as to whether Section 5.6, clause 33 applies to the discussions had within the executive Ministries which may have their own private archives.
Any discussion that happened during that time period eligible for declassification has been released. Private discussions within each ministry are visible as soon as they are archived. They are viewable here.
I will work on appropriately declassifying data from the diplomatic corps archives, otherwise everything else is declassified when archived.Zyvetskistaahn:I hate to triple post, but it has been some time. Does the Delegate have an answer?
Also, were there any discussions of the Cabinet which concluded between 26th January 2016 and 20th February 2016, and, if so, will they disclosed to the appropriate archive?
In the delegate's defense, the delay was due to admins (primarily myself) taking their time in deciding how to deal with the declassification of that forum.Zyvetskistaahn:I hate to triple post, but it has been some time. Does the Delegate have an answer?