[SC—AT VOTE—AGAINST] Repeal: "Liberate Eclipsis"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jinkies

Jinkies

Minister
-
-
-
TNP Nation
Vapid
Discord
solringen
sc.jpg

Repeal: "Liberate Eclipsis"
Category: < Repeal > | Target: SC#501
Proposed by: Tinhampton | Onsite Topic​
THE SECURITY COUNCIL:

IDENTIFYING Lunarvi as the original founder, and former WA Delegate, of [region=Eclipsis];

DISMAYED that, despite SC#501's claims that a Liberation would help "stymie the ease with which raiders can permanently claim control over the region," the raiders of Eclipsis managed to refound and annihilate the region during the vote on it, therefore making it totally useless and in desperate need of repeal;

NOTING that Lunarvi has taken this fact in their stride, as they are now the founder and WA Delegate of [region=Arborhaven], a new but rapidly-growing Frontier that is developing a community of its own; and

AFFIRMING the support of Lunarvi for this repeal:

HEREBY REPEALS SC#501 "Liberate Eclipsis."
Click to expand...

Note: Only votes from TNP WA nations, NPA personnel, and those on NPA deployments will be counted. If you do not meet these requirements, please add (non-WA) or something of that effect to your vote. If you are on an NPA deployment without being formally registered as an NPA member, name your deployed nation in your vote.
Voting Instructions:
  • Vote For if you want the Delegate to vote For the resolution.
  • Vote Against if you want the Delegate to vote Against the resolution.
  • Vote Abstain if you want the Delegate to abstain from voting on this resolution.
  • Vote Present if you are personally abstaining from this vote.
Detailed opinions with your vote are appreciated and encouraged!
ForAgainstAbstainPresent
01200
 
Last edited:
Overview

Repeal: "Liberate Eclipsis" seeks to remove a liberation on a region that has been invaded and refounded, Eclipsis, after the failure of defensive forces to secure the region post-invasion.

Recommendation

Repeal: "Liberate Eclipsis" is nothing less than an opportunistic and poorly researched attempt by the author to obtain yet another resolution at the expense of a native's embarrassment. Indeed, the author, Tinhampton, is sanctioned by The North Pacific and we are obligated to vote against any of their resolutions, so it is no surprise that they have tried to use a native as a shield.

For this reason, we recommend a vote AGAINST Repeal: "Liberate Eclipsis".

This IFV Recommendation was written by Vapid in collaboration with the Ministry of World Assembly Affairs.
 
Last edited:
[Non-WA]

Aside from the fact that we're treaty obligated to vote against, this is a poorly written badge hunt which only brings more attention to what is now a raider trophy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top