[GA - DEFEATED] The Children Act

Status
Not open for further replies.

Greater Cesnica

Resident
-
TNP Nation
Greater Nabeul
Discord
novemberstars#8888
ga.jpg

The Children Act
Category: Moral Decency | Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Telgan Alpha, Co-authored by: Tinhampton | Onsite Topic


Understanding that children require care, guidance, and protection as they grow and develop.

Disappointed, therefore, that the rights of children have seen relatively insufficient protection from this body (despite the laudable advances delivered by so few important Resolutions in these regards).

Convinced that an international, universal standard of parental rights and responsibilities, in addition to the rights of the child in defence of child welfare, must be enacted.

Further seeking to establish the best interests of the child, least restrictive intervention, and the reciprocity of intervention as the guiding principles of this Act.

Hoping that the aforementioned standards and principles - as well as measures to establish child welfare services and access to justice - will provide a solid foundation for the welfare of children everywhere.

The World Assembly hereby, subject to any limitations set by earlier resolutions that are still in force, enacts as follows:
  1. In this resolution:
    1. a "child" is defined as any person under the age of majority, and
    2. a "parent" is defined as any person who currently looks after any child as a consequence of birth, adoption, or court order.
  2. All parents of children in member states must show due regard to their rights and responsibilities as parents. In particular, they must:
    1. ensure that the physical, emotional, psychological, medical and educational needs of those children are met,
    2. ensure appropriate contact and relationship with those children, and
    3. otherwise dispense appropriate guidance and control over the welfare of those children, with due regard to their best interest, until the age of majority, and consideration given to age and maturity of said child.
  3. Member States must respect the rights of the child, in particular, it must:
    1. ensure children are empowered to state their views,
    2. faciliate the right to social and familial relationships,
    3. guarntee the right to education, as to meet individual need,
    4. ensure protection from harm and exploitation, and
    5. faciliate social and other developmental pursuits.
  4. Member states must establish child welfare services, which shall:
    1. intervene where they have a reasonable belief that parents have failed to discharge their Section 2 duties, or to assist in Section 3 duties,
    2. transfer a child to a safe location where they can prove significant likelihood that the failure of that child's parent(s) to discharge their Section 2 duties poses a significant risk to that child's life or development,
    3. never take any child away from their parents except in the course of a Section 4B transfer,
    4. robustly assess children and their immediate family members where those children are affected by a Section 4A intervention or Section 4B transfer,
    5. seek to work with such children and their parent(s) voluntarily (subject to Section 5C) and with as little restrictive intervention as possible, while also taking into account the expressed views of those children (with due regard to their maturity as assessed by welfare services, or by a specialist medical practitioner or judge) when making decisions,
    6. protect and support the development (including the care, guidance, and protection) of all children, whether or not they are affected by a Section 4A intervention, and
    7. ensure that their employees are qualified to discharge their duties, including by requiring them to adhere to an ethical code of conduct.
  5. Member States shall ensure the welfare of the child is protected through the legal system, which:
    1. must ensure the full representation of that child, in particular by:
      1. involving the child in the decision-making process with due regard to their age and maturity,
      2. allowing that child to express their views and have them considered when decisions are made (with due regard to their maturity) unless excused to protect their psychological welfare or due to their inability to understand, and
      3. allowing that child to request and use the services of a lawyer or advocate at no cost to them or their parent(s),
    2. must adopt their rulings with enough swiftness to avoid harm to the child, having due regards for the best interests in the child, and in order to adopt the least restrictive means of harm reduction possible,
    3. act as an arbitrator in regards to Section 3 rights,
    4. may require parents to co-operate with those child welfare services defined in Section 4, and such services to use all resources at their disposal to serve the best interests of the child,
    5. shall permit all rulings to be appealed to any higher courts that may exist, and
    6. may only remove any of a parent's rights with respect to any of their children if:
      1. it can be shown that the continued exercise of the targeted rights by that parent would beyond reasonable doubt cause significant harm to their children,
      2. all voluntary and less restrictive means of harm reduction have been exhausted, and
      3. the children and their parent(s) are informed about the rights that have been removed and the duration of their removal.
Co-author: Tinhampton
Note: Only votes from TNP WA nations and NPA personnel will be counted. If you do not meet these requirements, please add (non-WA) or something of that effect to your vote.
Voting Instructions:
  • Vote For if you want the Delegate to vote For the resolution.
  • Vote Against if you want the Delegate to vote Against the resolution.
  • Vote Abstain if you want the Delegate to abstain from voting on this resolution.
  • Vote Present if you are personally abstaining from this vote.
Detailed opinions with your vote are appreciated and encouraged!


ForAgainstAbstainPresent
2902
"The Children Act" was defeated 1,930 votes (13.4%) to 12,502 (86.6%).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
IFV

Overview
This proposal seeks to establish specific protections and rights for children. To do this, the authors first attempt to establish fundamental rights for children. Then they provide for their enforcement by establishing child welfare services in member states before attempting to ensure that domestic legal systems adequately provide for the welfare of children and their rights.

Recommendation
However, this resolution as written has many sections that are either unenforceable, incomprehensible, unclear, or riddled with spelling and grammatical errors. Section 4 sets to establish the duties of a child welfare services but subsection e makes all their work voluntary and thus unenforceable for anything outside of removing a child from the family. Several parts of section 5 are rendered incomprehensible due to lacking information about actions mentioned within the section including subsection 3 regarding an arbitration. Section 5f appears to allow abuse to continue without removal until all least restrictive methods are tried first due to a lack of clarity about when the least restrictive measures are applied first. And other errors throughout such as the misspelling of guarantee and facilitate in section 3.

For the above reasons, the Ministry of World Assembly Affairs recommends a vote Against the General Assembly Resolution at vote, “The Children Act”.

Our Voting Recommendation Dispatch--Please Upvote!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Against [Non-WA], because the eponymous book by Ian McEwan is rubbish.

In all seriousness though, Against [Non-WA]. Clause 2 is just virtue signaling which accomplished nothing in this context. The only remotely international thing covered here is Clause 4’s but about ensuring children’s welfare through the legal system.
 
This proposal has achieved the necessary approvals to enter the formal queue. Barring it being withdrawn or marked illegal it will proceed to a vote at Major Update on Thursday, December 30.
 
Present. I don't disagree with the principles involved, but most Tinhampton resolutions nudge the WA towards something run by AOC or Jeremy Corbyn, which I vehemently oppose.
 
Last edited:
Present. I don't disagree with the principles involved, but most Tinhampton resolutions nudge the WA towards something run by AOC or Jeremy Corbyn, which I vehemently oppose.
Tinhampton is a self-proclaimed British Tory supporter IRL :P
Although, Tinhampton has a reputation for badly written resolutions.
 
Against.
Sounds like the virtue signalling drivel the capitalists of the previous Republic attempted to use upon the comrades before the Revolution. At least the capitalists were educated enough for their points to be understood and not lost in the mess of grammar and spelling mistakes. The Autocratic Republic reiterates that it is against this resolution for insulting our comrades. Treating us as the uneducated Children they pretend to wish to save.
 
"The Children Act" was defeated 1,930 votes (13.4%) to 12,502 (86.6%).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top