1. How would you go about this? Why do you think it would be beneficial? Who would take it over from the government? These are all questions you should consider when proposing this sort of action.1.We want to privatise stuff like the NBS and the ministry of communications as a whole. Other ministries will just judge their futures without delegate intervention
2.what we define as inactive is that the last post is 7 or more minutes old
3.We will persuade the RP mods to allow more maps
4.A bit of both,we will use it as a OOC system on the forum,getting 3 lire daily as a citizen and 30 lire daily as a delegate
5.what I mean is to seek out embassies with other regions so we can get a idea of their region and use that to make them agree to our ideas
6. We want to restrict NPA powers ,not allow operations and stop them from recruiting and advertising. This is because we think they are getting bigger and bigger without response and soon TNP will be heavily controlled by them.
7.freedom of ideology and debates and more civil rights we won't go in detail right now
2. I think a lot of regions would beg to differ, but that's besides the point. If you want to allow double-posting, how many posts do you think should be allowed in a row? 2? 3? A set amount based on the time between messages? I don't really see a point in this as you can just edit your message if you want to add something on, but perhaps I'm missing something.
3. No. It's not in the government's control anyway and if Pry says no, you're not getting it. It also seems like there are a lot of maps already.
4. I've seen some regions do this before, but I don't really know how much people actually partake in it. XKI (10000 Islands) is one region which uses it, but I believe its somehow built into the forums. I don't know if this function could be built into the forums here, or if people would care enough to try.
5. I don't really see why we'd do that? We're also fairly selective in choosing embassies to begin with, and regions that do have similarities to us often reach out on their own.
6. I can only see this as a terrible idea. You made a point earlier about becoming a defender-only army, and that's a legitimate political argument, but what you're suggesting would quite literally destroy the NPA. The NPA needs to recruit new people constantly just because its existing members inevitably go inactive and it needs to do operations frequently so its at operational readiness. I don't really see them 'getting bigger and bigger' and there's certainly no reason to believe 'TNP will [soon] be heavily controlled by them'. NPA has existed for ages, and the elected government has been just fine. If an illegitimate order was given in the NPA to overthrow the elected Delegate, not only would its members not respond, but whoever gave that order would be promptly sacked. NPA is quite restricted as it is.
7. If this is a party platform, you should go into detail. You already said you didn't want fascists in this region, so that's good, but you need to be more specific about what 'freedom of ideology' and 'more civil rights' entails.