Vote for me and I'll find a way to make the Court interesting for a bit, it's been boring af recently and frankly the entire region needs a kick in the shins. Y'all been decadent.
1) I plan on stirring up trouble elsewhere that will result in cases coming before the Court that will be of high entertainment value.abc said:
I fully agree with and endorse Mall's all encompassing platform and campaign. We need an agent of change in The North Pacific, and we need Mall as that person.
If elected, how do you plan to change and make an impact in the Court?
Why should I vote for you over your opponents?
The first mistake was thinking that I could be successfully prosecuted. After that the prosecution made the very wise choice of literally not showing up and letting me win by default. The Court wisely decided not to push it and let me win.Dinoium said:Do you think the prosecution, defense, or the court made a mistake in "The North Pacific v. Mall" and if so, name them..
This sounds like RPSyrixia said:A woman stepped up to speak. "Hej. I'm from the Confederation Public Broadcasting Corporation's CPBC news team. I'd like to know, how did you react to the Modergen attacks a couple years ago in Goyanes? Do you agree with the sentence given to Heidi Kallstrom?"