Gracius Maximus
Tyrant (Ret.)
Has the precedent for the posting of the oath altered in the last year? I just want to be certain as this is the format I have used here since 2006.
The most recent being: https://forum.thenorthpacific.org/topic/9145386/page-138#post-10108909
I should note that I can go back through the record and see that some nations have been rejected for posting the oath incorrectly but that this has not been uniformly enforced and that there are several instances of nations posting an oath similar to my own, which incidentally is in the correct format, just with a defining of who 'I' is in this instance. The practical application of the oath is still valid and nothing within the meaning or application of the oath has been altered.
The most recent being: https://forum.thenorthpacific.org/topic/9145386/page-138#post-10108909
I should note that I can go back through the record and see that some nations have been rejected for posting the oath incorrectly but that this has not been uniformly enforced and that there are several instances of nations posting an oath similar to my own, which incidentally is in the correct format, just with a defining of who 'I' is in this instance. The practical application of the oath is still valid and nothing within the meaning or application of the oath has been altered.
Last edited: