[GA, Passed] Circulation of World Assembly Law

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sil Dorsett

Sil Dorsett

The Belt Collector
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
TNP Nation
sil_dorsett
Discord
sildorsett

ga.jpg

Circulation of World Assembly Law
Category: Education and Creativity | Area of Effect: Education
Proposed by: Wallenburg | Onsite Topic​

Aware that compliance with World Assembly laws relies upon popular understanding of national and international law,

Valuing prompt and appropriate publication of newly enacted national and international legislation,

Recognizing the benefits of a well-informed populace,

Wishing to inform the general public on all matters of World Assembly law,

The World Assembly,

[ol][li]Requires member nations to make available to all their inhabitants the text of World Assembly resolutions,


[li]Urges member states to include information on particularly important World Assembly resolutions in their public education curriculum, and thorough education on all facets of World Assembly legislation in publicly funded legal education,


[li]Recommends that member nations encourage all inhabitants to seek an understanding of World Assembly law, especially if it directly affects their lives,


[li]Tasks a World Assembly Law Dissemination Service, hereafter referred to as WALDS, with the publication of World Assembly resolutions, and with the timely dissemination of these publications to inhabitants of member states,

[ol][li]The WALDS shall oversee the dissemination of publications such as law books of previously passed resolutions, public notices of newly enacted resolutions and repeals, and commentary of ambassadors and other relevant public figures familiar with World Assembly law,


[li]These publications shall include the text of passed resolutions and resolutions at vote, analytical and contextual commentary on their clauses, their effects on member states and their inhabitants, and any other information the WALDS considers relevant to its audiences,[/li][/ol]
[li]Advises the WALDS to negotiate and cooperate with national publishers and news media in order to reduce costs, delegate responsibility, and increase efficacy of its publications,


[li]Mandates the free passage of agents of the WALDS to and from member states in order to carry out their duties, subject to any standard border safety measures not related to their status as World Assembly employees,


[li]Also mandates that member states allow the WALDS to negotiate and cooperate with public and private publishers and news media operating within their borders, with the consent of said organizations.[/li][/ol]
Click to expand...
Voting Instructions:[ul][li]Vote For if you want the Delegate to vote For the resolution.[li]Vote Against if you want the Delegate to vote Against the resolution.[li]Vote Abstain if you want the Delegate to abstain from voting on this resolution.[li]Vote Present if you are personally abstaining from this vote.[/li][/ul]

Detailed opinions with your vote are appreciated and encouraged!
 
[quote uid=0 name="The Ministry's Analysis" ]The proposal is designed to improve the dissemination of information relating to World Assembly legislation, and ushers the development of a WA service branch to work with member nations in carrying out that task.

The only mandatory clauses to be followed by members are to make WA resolution texts available (not require forceful dissemination of them) and to not interfere with the Law Dissemination Service's work by deliberately discriminating against its employees.

The remainder of the resolution, specifically clauses 2 and 3 are optional, as their enacting clauses are "Urges" and "Recommends", respectively. Clauses 2 and 3 request that additional emphasis on WA law be entered into the education system and that member states make strident efforts to ensure the widest possible understanding and appreciation of both rights and obligations, among citizens. This to improve compliance among WA nations; but, also to ensure that the public has the ability to govern up, and ensure their nation is meeting its obligations to the Assembly, and the international community. However, as stated before this is technically optional, though highly encouraged.

The Ministry of World Assembly Affairs recommends a vote for the resolution.[/quote]
 
Against. I'm not huge in NatSov, but there are so many (albeit mild) requirements that member nations are subjected and will influence a nation's ability to decide its own education curriculum, border security, press freedoms, etc.
For. Ghost flipped me.
 
For.
This sort of legislation affords national populations greater access to an understanding of their rights under law, and will prevent unscrupulous nations from suppressing that information. A more informed populace can also hold their governments to greater accountability if they have a clearer understanding of their government's obligations to WA law.
 
[quote uid=3325 name="El Fiji Grande" ]Against. I'm not huge in NatSov, but there are so many (albeit mild) requirements that member nations are subjected and will influence a nation's ability to decide its own education curriculum, border security, press freedoms, etc. [/quote]Such as? All of these requirements read to me as being consistent with disseminating information they theoretically already have. WA law already constrains WA members so how is this really adding to the burden?
 
Really the only mandatory stuff is make it available (doesn't mean ram it down people's throats) and don't stand in the way of WALDS just because they're WALDS.

For
 
Against.
Setting a precedent of forcing member nations to allow outside agencies (WALDS) into the country, regardless of their intentions, is not something I want to see become more widespread.
 
", subject to any standard border safety measures not related to their status as World Assembly employees,"

Doesn't force you to take them in. Only says you can't turn them away just because of their job.
 
[quote uid=5509 name="Sil Dorsett" ]", subject to any standard border safety measures not related to their status as World Assembly employees,"

Doesn't force you to take them in. Only says you can't turn them away just because of their job.[/quote]Exactly, if I don't want them in for their job, that's not reason to turn them away.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top