[GA] Repeal: “Enabling The Disabled In Academia” [Complete]

TlomzKrano

Just a blob chasing cars
-
-
-
-
TNP Nation
Kranostav
Discord
Tlomz
Category: Repeal
Target: GA #404
Proposed by: Imperium Anglorum
Onsite Topic

General Assembly Resolution #404 “Enabling The Disabled In Academia” (Category: Education and Creativity; Area of Effect: Educational) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Whereas legislation passed by the World Assembly cannot be amended or changed, only repealed, and that any correction of the problems noted in the target resolution would first require passage of a repeal:

And whereas it is the case that

a. the members of the World Assembly, and the assembly itself, have limited resources,

b. this resolution effectively forces members to provide accommodations and various support groups in all places of education, both public and private, imposing huge costs which (for private systems especially) would be difficult or impossible to bear,

c. it can both be cheaper for nations to provide a higher level of accommodation and support in specialised organisations more suited to persons with specific disabilities via e.g. enrolment in specialised schools,

d. schools can serve multiple functions, but they cannot serve all functions simultaneously without compromising quality, and

e. accommodations for one group can trade off with the welfare of another, derived simply from the fact that resources are fungible:

And whereas the resolution's definitions are unsound as

a. the definition of 'disabled' includes practically all manner of different ailments or manners of imperfect health, their being a condition that 'limits movements, senses, or activities',

b. that definition fails to consider such things as learning disabilities, which do not limit movement, senses, or physical activity, and therefore does not provide those accommodations which the resolution seeks, and

c. the definition of 'disabled student', beyond the fact that knowledge is not disbursed as if it were coin, only applies to 'academic settings' which many times are not the only places of education.

And whereas this resolution offers little improvement over those protections already instituted in section 2 of the resolution 'A Promotion of Basic Education' and the resolution 'Charter of Civil Rights', while blocking the passage of mandates for effective accommodation that are currently being drafted:

And whereas the use of the phrase 'the disabled' dehumanises persons living with disabilities, reducing them to be a problem to be normalised or 'solved' whilst subsuming their identities into a single aspect of their personhood:

Now, therefore, be it enacted by the World Assembly, by and with the advice and consent of its members, and by the authority of the same, that the resolution entitled 'Enabling The Disabled in Academia' be repealed.

Voting Instructions:
  • Vote For if you want the Delegate to vote For the resolution.
  • Vote Against if you want the Delegate to vote Against the resolution.
  • Vote Abstain if you want the Delegate to abstain from voting on this resolution.
  • Vote Present if you are personally abstaining from this vote.

Detailed opinions with your vote are appreciated and encouraged!

[wavote=the_north_pacific,ga]2017_08_02_repeal_enabling_the_disabled_in_academia[/wavote]
[wavote=world,ga]2017_08_02_repeal_enabling_the_disabled_in_academia[/wavote]
 
I'm voting against. The repeal proposal is littered with errors, and drafting it without a replacement is just laziness.

The worst periods in the GA were just hyper-pedantic repeals, and going back to those days is not desirable.
 
(The WA Minister decided that no IFV would be sent as the recommendation to repeal was dependent on Abbey's replacement being ready.)
 
No, RL circumstances (my computer breaking) prevented me from drafting it. Today, I should be able to.
 
For

This repeal will improve organization's ability to help the disabled without bankrupting themselves, and a better and more efficient bill will be able to be passed in its place.
 
Against.

As I stated in the thread dealing with the original resolution, I do not think that the argument on cost is well made out. The definition related and terminological issues raised are, I believe, problematic and a different resolution is probably warranted, however, I do not like insta-repeals generally and the apparent lack of a replacement concerns me.
 
A replacement is being drafted but is still in the early stages. I hope to have a first draft up in the WALL forum later today.
 
Abbey:
A replacement is being drafted but is still in the early stages. I hope to have a first draft up in the WALL forum later today.
Appears as if its going to pass anyway. Might want to get a repeal proposal in the works
 
TlomzKrano:
Abbey:
A replacement is being drafted but is still in the early stages. I hope to have a first draft up in the WALL forum later today.
Appears as if its going to pass anyway. Might want to get a repeal proposal in the works
I'd believe that it would be replacement legislation, not a repeal. But semantics aside, I'd be happy to look at Abbey's proposal and also caution that Araraukar may be moving forward with a similar proposal in the near future.
 
Imperium Anglorum:
TlomzKrano:
Abbey:
A replacement is being drafted but is still in the early stages. I hope to have a first draft up in the WALL forum later today.
Appears as if its going to pass anyway. Might want to get a repeal proposal in the works
I'd believe that it would be replacement legislation, not a repeal. But semantics aside, I'd be happy to look at Abbey's proposal and also caution that Araraukar may be moving forward with a similar proposal in the near future.
You are correct. I misinterpreted what was intended.
 
Voting on this resolution has ended.

Thanks to those nations who cast their votes. Your participation is a great help to the region.

This topic has been locked and sent to the Archives for safekeeping. If you would like this topic to be re-opened for further discussion, please contact the WA Delegate, a Global Moderator, or an Administrator for assistance. Thank you.
 
Back
Top