I'd like to put to rest the claims made by this candidate two pages ago about talking to Alexandria's privy council for two weeks:
Firstly, you don't seem to have realised that I am Alexandria's head of state. You have most certainly not been in communication with the Privy Council for two weeks.
When I said that the reasons for the treaty not being moved beyond drafting were obvious I'd hoped you would have understood, but you didn't: Delegate SillyString and I agreed that it would be incredibly unprofessional and a pure conflict of interest for me to sign a treaty twice - not to mention an insult. I'd sign as the Sovereign of Alexandria, and as Delegate of The North Pacific. To avoid that, the treaty was kept on the drafting table until such a time I was no longer delegate to be picked up should my successor choose to do so.
As for why Diamete didn't know? Why would he when it didn't move beyond a draft? I don't need a Foreign Minister to write a treaty, especially since the entire basis of my NS experience is in foreign affairs and diplomacy. That said, in his own words "I've had you writing my documents since I realised you were better than me at it!" which plays into it.
It is decidedly unwise to make wild comments about what it is you've been doing while representing The North Pacific in the Kingdom of Alexandria, least of all because in Alexandria, I -can- find out and verify it.
I do not need to discredit you with the Privy Council of State. You've done that well enough already.
While I am the Sovereign of Alexandria - it is Fiermont (better known as Feirmont) who has been running Alexandria's executive since January of this year - since when it became likely that I would win the General Election I appointed a Regent to keep the government on its course. Since that point, my name has been posted on statements, and people have posted them on their accounts while an admin uses a special moderation tool (like the NSforum has) to change the posting author to make them appear to have come from me. I take the separation of hats, duties and roles incredibly seriously, I always have, and always will.
That "treaty" isn't on the law books because it has not been presented to the RA, and nor will it be while I am in office. Perhaps I'll present it in my final days? Most likely not.
... If I were putting my interests ahead of this region Gemini, there would be an executive council full of Alexandrian loyalists, that treaty would have been a done deal, I would have been doing security checks and I would have loudly made an arse of The North Pacific on a world state repeatedly by interfering in minor things that didn't actually mean anything, by closing embassies with regions over perceived slights, or even disregarding the will of the region on things like WA votes.
The Delegate of The North Pacific governs with the consent and agreement of the Regional Assembly. It is charged with, and swears to, follow the laws of the region, to protect it and carry out its constitutionally mandated duties. If you believe that I have violated that oath, I would invite you to file the suitable charges with the Attorney General with your supporting evidence.
"because its about time you took some goddamn responsibility in the areas of Foreign Policy and Embassies would be nice."
I fail to see where I have not taken responsibility in that area. I suggest you actually read my review of the term that has passed - since I don't believe you bothered to.
