The Court accepts the above indictment of Nubt II of Mortipal. The Court appoints @Dreadton as moderating Justice and @Lord Dominator as Standby Hearing Officer.Indictment
I bring forward the following charge(s) holding that all the below is true and honest to the best of my belief.
Name of Complainant: Vivanco
Name(s) of Accused: Nubt II of Mortipal
Date(s) of Alleged Crime(s): Thursday 28th of October 2021
Crime: Espionage
Specifics of Crime(s):
The Accused, Nubt II of Mortipal, willfully exposed private information being discussed in the Private Halls of the Regional Assembly without authoritation of the Regional Assembly. The Private Halls are a hidden forum only visible for citizens and, as such, members of the Regional Assembly. The accused posted and revealed confidential information being prepared in these halls in their public media "The North Pacific Today", to be exact within their Master Thread, on their Issue 1-T.
This media is of public access, and has thus shared information to the full public, to all groups and regions' access, an information that hasn't been legitimately sanctioned by the entity the information is gathered from, this entity being the Regional Assembly at large as it was gathered from the Private Halls where only members can access.
Summary of Events:
As above.
Evidence:
https://forum.thenorthpacific.org/topic/9195063/post-10466381
![]()
Section 1.2: Espionage
6. "Espionage" is defined as sharing information with a group or region when that act of sharing has not been legitimately sanctioned by the entity the information is gathered from, as limited by this section.
Section 1.11: Conspiracy
24. "Conspiracy" is defined as planning, attempting, or helping to commit any crime under this criminal code.
I'd like to add to the evidence the RMB post and a request of order to preserve evidence in order to avoid evidence tampering.Indictment
I bring forward the following charge(s) holding that all the below is true and honest to the best of my belief.
Name of Complainant: Vivanco
Name(s) of Accused: Zohaib
Date(s) of Alleged Crime(s): Wednesday 20th of April 2022
Crime: Espionage and Conspiracy of Espionage
Specifics of Crime(s):
The Accused, Zohaib, has admitted to have leaked and shared regional secrets with a region without being sanctioned by The North Pacific Army.
This admission was done in the RMB and screenshot by @Dreadton .
At the moment of the crime and admission, the accused Zohaib was still a Citizen, for the Speaker has not taken down their status of citizenship per their rejection of citizenship following the legislation within the Legal Code, and thus being still subject to TNP laws.
It's clear the subject, if the espionage admission was not proof enough, it is clear they have attempted or planned to do such a thing within the region to breach the region's trust and commit the crime of Espionage.
Summary of Events:
As above.
Evidence:
Screenshot taken by Dreadton
Your honours, I would like to drop the indictment from the latter reveal of the reason being a bluff.
Section 1.2: Espionage
6. "Espionage" is defined as sharing information with a group or region when that act of sharing has not been legitimately sanctioned by the entity the information is gathered from, as limited by this section.
June 7, 2023
[9:17 PM]Gorundu: Well this is interesting
[9:18 PM]Gorundu: Someone decided to leak Madjack’s comments about Euro joining Aegis from TRR’s private citizen’s forum to Rand
[9:19 PM]Gorundu: And Rand decided to confront me about it instead of just keeping it close to his chest
[9:19 PM]Gorundu: [REDACTED]
[9:24 PM]Gorundu: Obviously I have to say it’s his personal opinion and doesn’t reflect the government’s view etc but I think the other thing here is we have knowledge that a citizen of TRR is leaking private information, and as an ally we have a duty to inform them. The thing I’m unsure about is whether I should also make this fact clear to Rand.
[9:38 PM]Ghost: And I don’t suppose Rand will mention who told him
[9:39 PM]Gorundu: [REDACTED]
[9:39 PM]Ghost: But I’m not sure what confronting you is supposed to accomplish
[9:40 PM]Ghost: Does he want MadJack fired or something?
[9:43 PM]Gorundu: [REDACTED]
[9:43 PM]Gorundu: I guess it kind of reads like he's trying to apply pressure to get Madjack fired
[9:49 PM]Ghost: It’s obviously not the government’s position either. And I believe we are treaty obligated to inform TRR of the leak. And I think we should at least ask Rand who told him this info, as it does constitute a leak and we have obligations to let them know of it*
*I would be sure on what those obligations actually are
[9:50 PM]Gorundu: [REDACTED]
[9:52 PM]Ghost: [REDACTED]
[9:52 PM]Gorundu: [REDACTED]
[9:52 PM]Ghost: [REDACTED]
[9:52 PM]Ghost: [REDACTED]
[9:53 PM]Ghost: [REDACTED]
[9:53 PM]Gorundu: [REDACTED]
[9:53 PM]Gorundu: [REDACTED]
[9:53 PM]Ghost: [REDACTED]
[9:54 PM]Gorundu: [REDACTED]
[9:54 PM]Ghost: [REDACTED]
[9:55 PM]Gorundu: [REDACTED]
[9:59 PM]Ghost: [REDACTED]
[10:00 PM]Gorundu: [REDACTED]
[10:05 PM]Gorundu: The purpose of this is either to put a wedge between us and Euro, or to try force Madjack out of government. Either way perhaps I should be telling Rand that someone is trying to manipulate our relationship, and it would be for our benefit to know who that is.
[10:08 PM]Ghost: I think that's absolutely a fair point to raise
[10:10 PM]Ghost: but also, that was TRR and not TNP, is not consistent with our foreign policy or position on this, and it was made in a private citizen area - we can't enforce behavior in those spaces and shouldn't even know about it...though that last point probably wouldn't help much being brought up to him
June 8, 2023
[3:17 AM]St George: [REDACTED]
[3:17 AM]St George: Can I tell TRR about this?
[3:21 AM]St George: [REDACTED]
[3:22 AM]Gorundu: Uh...not sure starting a diplomatic spat with Euro is what I want right now
[3:23 AM]St George: So that's a no on telling trr that Europeia is spying on them?
[3:31 AM]Gorundu: No, I'm telling TRR regardless, just want to hear what Rand has to say first
[3:32 AM]Gorundu: I thought by this you meant you want to say it publicly in TRR
[3:33 AM]St George: As funny as that would be, I like Cat and don't want to give them too many headaches
[11:44 AM]St George: Has Rand said anything?
[12:07 PM]Gorundu: not yet
June 9, 2023
[3:08 AM]St George: Has TRR been told yet?
[7:12 AM]Gorundu: Rand wants you demasked from the MGC server
[7:13 AM]Gorundu: And completely ignored what I said about informing TRR
[7:14 AM]St George: What would you like to you
[7:19 AM]Gorundu: I don't particularly want to put up a fight about removing you from the MGC server, but I am uneasy about Rand calling you a "bad-faith actor" in his reply
[7:20 AM]St George: Ok, you can remove me from the MGC server.
[7:25 AM]Gorundu: sigh
Naturally I will recuse myself from consideration of this case.Given the clear conflict of interest and the potential for them to be called as a witness, I call upon the recusal of Justice @Pallaith
Legal Code of the North Pacific:Section 1.13: Gross Misconduct
27. "Gross Misconduct" is defined as the violation of an individual's legally mandated sworn oath, either willfully or through negligence.
In my assessment I do not believe that we are unable to hold a fair trial for MadJack. @Attempted Socialism did not influence the selection of the Standby Hearing Officer, that selection was made through consultations @Sanctaria and I carried out, the same consulations that led to the appointment of @Great Bights Mum as Temporary Hearing Officer. As I believe @Sanctaria, @Great Bights Mum and I are capable of judging this case fairly, and I similarly believe @Oracle can, I do not find that this panel and backup are incapable of judging @St George and decline your motion.
As your motion has highlighted a flaw of the court procedures, I thank you for that. However I must also remind you that frivolous motions are not allowed and can lead to sanctions. I ask you to consider how to show your client in the best light and seek a favorable outcome for them, and to be careful of any strategy which would merely delay the case.
I should have included above that in my view @Attempted Socialism used the discretion allowed to him to the extent be believed it existed, by effectively delegating the selection of a Standby Hearing Officer to the unrecused justice (me) in consultation with the available temporary hearing officer. I find that interpretation appropriate in this circumstance.
Legal Code of the North Pacific:Section 3.2: Appointment of Hearing Officers
4. A conflict of interest occurs when a Justice or Hearing Officer has a vested interest in a matter before the Court, or when they are otherwise unable to rule in a fair and unbiased manner.
5. Justices and Hearing Officers are required to recuse themselves from matters where they have a certain or potential conflict of interest.
I, Eluvatar, do hereby solemnly swear that during my term as Justice, I will uphold the ideals of Democracy, Freedom, and Justice of The Region of The North Pacific. I will use the powers and rights granted to me through The North Pacific Constitution and Legal Code in a legal, responsible, and unbiased manner, not abusing my power, committing misfeasance, malfeasance, or nonfeasance in office, in any gross or excessive manner. I will act only in the best interests of The North Pacific, not influenced by personal gain or any outside force, and within the restraints of my legally granted power. As such, I hereby take up the office of Justice with all the powers, rights, and responsibilities held therein.
In my assessment I do not believe that we are unable to hold a fair trial for MadJack. @Attempted Socialism did not influence the selection of the Standby Hearing Officer, that selection was made through consultations @Sanctaria and I carried out, the same consulations that led to the appointment of @Great Bights Mum as Temporary Hearing Officer. As I believe @Sanctaria, @Great Bights Mum and I are capable of judging this case fairly, and I similarly believe @Oracle can, I do not find that this panel and backup are incapable of judging @St George and decline your motion.
As your motion has highlighted a flaw of the court procedures, I thank you for that. However I must also remind you that frivolous motions are not allowed and can lead to sanctions. I ask you to consider how to show your client in the best light and seek a favorable outcome for them, and to be careful of any strategy which would merely delay the case.]
I should have included above that in my view @Attempted Socialism used the discretion allowed to him to the extent be believed it existed, by effectively delegating the selection of a Standby Hearing Officer to the unrecused justice (me) in consultation with the available temporary hearing officer. I find that interpretation appropriate in this circumstance.
As Chief Justice it is my duty to appoint a Standby Hearing Officer. As I am recused in the case, I rely absolutely on the recommendation from the moderating Justice and the Temporary Hearing Officers, to avoid any undue influence over the case.
The Moderating Justice has recommended appointing @Oracle, and I shall follow that recommendation.
Section 3.2: Appointment of Hearing Officers
4. A conflict of interest occurs when a Justice or Hearing Officer has a vested interest in a matter before the Court, or when they are otherwise unable to rule in a fair and unbiased manner.
5. Justices and Hearing Officers are required to recuse themselves from matters where they have a certain or potential conflict of interest.
6. If one or more Justice positions are vacant, or any Justice is absent or has recused themselves, the remaining Justices will promptly appoint replacements from among available citizens to participate as temporary Hearing Officers.
7. If all Justices are vacant, absent, or have recused themselves, the Delegate will promptly appoint the needed Hearing Officers from among available citizens with the agreement of the Speaker.
8. Any recusal or absence of a Hearing Officer will be treated as a vacancy.
9. The Court may recuse any Justice or Hearing Officer by majority vote.
10. The Court must hold a vote on whether to recuse a Justice or Hearing Officer when publicly requested by the prosecution, defense, or petitioner in any matter before the Court.
Section 1.1: Treason
2. "Treason" is defined as taking arms or providing material support to a group or region for the purpose of undermining or overthrowing the lawful government of The North Pacific or any of its treatied allies as governed by the Constitution.
3. No player maintaining a nation in a region or organization at war with TNP may maintain a nation within TNP, or participate in the governance thereof, for the duration of hostilities.
4. At this time, there are no regions or organizations at war with TNP. At this time TNP is allied with Balder, Equilism, Europe, Europeia, Greater Dienstad, International Democratic Union, Lazarus, Stargate, Taijitu, The East Pacific, The Pacific, the Rejected Realms and the West Pacific.
5. The Speaker will update the preceding clause as appropriate.
...
Section 1.12: Conspiracy
26. "Conspiracy" is defined as planning, attempting, or helping to commit any crime under this criminal code.
The indictment has been accepted. The trial, and response to the request for Pre-Sentencing Ban or Ejection can be found here.Indictment and Request for Approval
I bring forward the following charge(s) and request that the Court approve the ejection and banning of the below nations holding that all the below is true and honest to the best of my belief.
Name of Complainant: Kaschovia
Name(s) of Accused: The Northern Boys and Palvatone
Date(s) of Alleged Crime(s): Monday 9th October 2023
Crime: Treason and Fraud
Specifics of Crime(s)/Summary of Events: On Monday 9th October, the two nations Palvatone and The Northern Boys sent multiple telegrams to nations within The North Pacific containing fraudulent and treasonous material. The Northern Boys claimed they were from the North Pacific Regional Security War Council, that individuals in opposition to the region are trying to coup, and that Chipoli is the "true Delegate" instead of Pallaith, encouraging endorsements of Chipoli and withdrawal of endorsements on Pallaith. The nation Palvatone claimed to be the "Minister of Domestic Affairs of the North Pacific", a position which does not exist, and claimed that Pallaith is the "actual, confirmed, WA Delegate" and should be endorsed while Chipoli should be unendorsed. In a second telegram, Palvatone refers to Pallaith as "our rightfully elected delegate" and encourages the recipient to withdraw endorsements from the Delegate Kaschovia.
Reasons for seeking approval (how does the nation pose a clear security threat and why is their removal is necessary for the protection of the region): These nations claimed to represent the government with the intention of creating confusion among the recipients of the telegrams around the endorsements of Pallaith and Chipoli and attempted to undermine the endorsement levels of the elected Delegate and therefore the security of our region. It is now known that Palvatone maintains a nation, Volstrostia, in the Brotherhood of Malice, with whom we are at war.
If the nation has already been ejected or banned, when was this action taken: Palvatone has been banned, but the ban occurred once that nation had left the region. The Northern Boys has not been ejected or banned.
Evidence:
Telegram from The Northern Boys
Telegram from Palvatone
Another Telegram from Palvatone
Empire of Australia Raid Report by Alex of BoM
Alex's Puppet Confirmed as Palvatone
A moderating justice has been determine, we’re just held up on the THO we also need - it has been actively worked on.I decline to refile and want to proceed on the two Gross Misconduct charges the court has accepted.
Under Court Rule 1.5 I request the Chief Justice to promptly appoint a Moderating Justice.
[center][b]Indictment[/b][/center]
I bring forward the following charge(s) holding that all the below is true and honest to the best of my belief.
[b]Name of Complainant: Oskland
Name(s) of Accused: Lionsroar
Date(s) of Alleged Crime(s): Dec 12th 2023
Crime: spam, false information on TNP RMB Guidelines
Specifics of Crime(s): emoji spaming
Summary of Events:
Evidence:[/b] I will share with Judge's nation on NS Due to inability of sharing it here
Rejected. Please resubmit with links, screenshots, or at the very least a description of the claim.
[center][b]Indictment[/b][/center]
I bring forward the following charge(s) holding that all the below is true and honest to the best of my belief.
[b]Name of Complainant: Oskland
Name(s) of Accused: Lionsroar
Date(s) of Alleged Crime(s): Dec 12th 2023
Crime: spam, false information on TNP RMB Guidelines
Specifics of Crime(s): emoji spaming
Summary of Events:
Evidence:[/b] https://www.nationstates.net/page=display_region_rmb/region=the_north_pacific?postid=54202473#p54202473
[center][b]Indictment[/b][/center]
I bring forward the following charge(s) holding that all the below is true and honest to the best of my belief.
[b]Name of Complainant: Oskland
Name(s) of Accused: Lionsroar
Date(s) of Alleged Crime(s): Dec 12th 2023
Crime: spam, false information on TNP RMB Guidelines
Specifics of Crime(s): emoji spaming and Providing false Information on TNP RMB rules.
Summary of Events: one day I was talking to my buddies, and I think i was discussing SR RP agreements and then after that u logged of for
About an hour or two. I come back and I see @Lionsmeow posting a post with a emoji, that is considered emoji spaming on TNP RMB
Guidelines so I confronted him and he denied stating that there has to be no words and emoji's on RMB, Messages to be considered
Emoji spaming. I looked at the RMB Guidelines and it said [I]even a single emoji is considered emoji spaming [/I]and @Lionsmeow had a single
Emoji on his message on the RMB But Lionsroar said there has to be no words and just emoji's to be considered emoji spaming however the
Factbook he published on his factbook section said otherwise
Evidence:[/b] https://www.nationstates.net/page=display_region_rmb/region=the_north_pacific?postid=54202473#p54202473
Yes. But it also doesn't say that it can't be emoji spaming if there Is wordsIt has been clarified that the guidelines prohibit messages that consist only of emoji as spam. Even if it's a single emoji. But they do not prohibit use of emoji in messages that have text to them and are not otherwise prohibited.
More crucially, however, the RMB guidelines are not enforced through criminal trials. They are enforced through summary suppression, ejection, or bans, which are subject to judicial review.
Please stop posting this complaint.
wait can i sue a region?Indictment
I bring forward the following charge(s) holding that all the below is true and honest to the best of my belief.
Name of Complainant: Sawenia
Name(s) of Accused:https://www.nationstates.net/region=the_north_pacific_army
Date(s) of Alleged Crime(s): 2021 314days ago
Crime: Using TNP Flag and NPA Name
Specifics of Crime(s):
The Accused, The North Pacific Army has used the flag and the name of our regional military,NPA without the government permission to do so.
Summary of Events:
As above.
Evidence:https://imgur.com/a/frDFyVp
Nowait can i sue a region?