I agree with Flemingovia. We shouldn't stand for other regions trying to tell us what to do.I am hard pushed to see the change in heart. All I can see is that they have renamed the Pacific Militia the PAcific Army, and ended their rather petty opposition to the region of the Pacific Army.
They have not addressed the issue central to the closing of their embassy, which is their attempted interference in our foreign policy; or has there been a change of heart on this, and is this addressed in a post I have missed?
There was a book written many years ago called "How Diplomats Cause War". I forget who wrote it, off hand.Oh come on, it wouldn't be so fun otherwise.
The Pacific, as usual, finds a cleaver sortie out of its problems. Those of you who believe this region has a history of preference of war over diplomacy should perhaps be reminded that in the past, war was usually brought onto them. And do read up on the diplomatic accomplishments of the now defunct PRP, I hear they are quite interesting
You did not miss a post.I am hard pushed to see the change in heart. All I can see is that they have renamed the Pacific Militia the PAcific Army, and ended their rather petty opposition to the region of the Pacific Army.
They have not addressed the issue central to the closing of their embassy, which is their attempted interference in our foreign policy; or has there been a change of heart on this, and is this addressed in a post I have missed?