Search results

You know I'm sure I could write literal pages on what got me here, but it is so great to see someone with experience willing to step into the job for the first time. You have my full support.

Full support, Cloud

JayDee is BestDee.

When you're definitely winning the argument you want to win.

:pikathink: this feels like a thread we'd see in Republic Square.

For (non-WA)

No, absolutely not. Against (non-WA).

For (non-WA).

Not really addressing the overall argument because I have no strong opinions either way beyond “some norms are just that and best remain uncodified”, but merely going to say: the neutrality of the presiding officer is a largely Anglophone tradition but is not in any way strange. It’s meant to...

Hard Against (non-WA).

For (non-WA)

121

113

23

9

4

2

Finally, proposal authors you can trust who are in this For Your Protection. For (non-WA).

For (non-WA)

For (non-WA)

For (non-WA)

For (non-WA)

No brainer and no questions other than what’s the state of the inquiry and how does the EC plan to prevent whatever issue occurred in May 2023 going forward?

Court Justice: 1. < Pallaith > 2. < Eluvatar > 3. < Attempted Socialism > 4. < Just a Lore > Would you like to reopen nominations? < No >

I agree with what was done even if it really is kind of awful to do it this way. If Gor make the decision, I do not understand why it needed to fall to Chip to make it.

I nominate @Pallaith, @Attempted Socialism, @Eluvatar, @Sanctaria, and @Lord Dominator

Not that it matters but now that I know who the author is, I want to note for the record, I’ve changed my vote back to Against (non-WA).

A very interesting piece!

As I recall, they hang around with some pretty questionable people. Against (non-WA).

For (non-WA)