Search results

Sure, but the "from this point forward" made it sound like it was for longer than the rest of Aba's term.

I don't think you can unilaterally make such a decision that is binding on future Vice Delegates.

My TNP nation, Sanctarian WA Mission, is now also my WA nation. Again.

Against.

Pretty sure a common link to all school shootings is guns. Course that's me being ridiculous though.

Like Aba please be more explicit. Like vote aye :P

Yeah, Aba, be more explicit :P

We can't legislate for non-member states. However, to answer your question, my writing of the proposal, and as such my reading of the proposal, to get around (i.e. to not adhere to) WAAA-standard regulations would be to circumvent the resolution, which is proscribed.

1. The addition of compelling practical purpose was necessary when the extant resolution CoCR is taken into consideration. Typically most resolutions that forbid discrimination in certain areas include the compelling practical purpose provision. One such compelling practical purpose would be...

TNP Nation: Sanctarian WA Mission Court Justice (Pick 3): < Kiwi | SillyString | abstain > Would you like to reopen nominations? < Yes > Attorney General: < abstain > Would you like to reopen nominations? < Yes>

I know I can't vote, but my interactions with Yohannes have always been pleasant and I've found he's one of the most helpful nations to know. He's put a load of work into developing his nation and his presence in II, F&NI, and GE&T is massive. He definitely deserves a commendation.

When Vice Delegate I rejected your application because I thought you were a Security Risk. Since then things have changed and you're now a member of the RA, thanks to the Court, and have worked as as a prosecutor before. However some things don't change and I still view you as a security risk...

I voted no because it's a harmless piece of legislation and this is only a game. Also because I like flem now. He's silly.

I agree with this. Instead of "amendment to chapt X subsection Y", I'd like to see something more along the lines of Freedom of Information (Security Council) (Amendment) Bill 2014. Though that's just my bias of being familiar with my RL country's statute books.

TNP Nation: Sanctarian WA Mission Vote: Kiwi

I don't agree with this bill. It leaves us open to foreign interference and increases the possibility of rogue delegates. Cannot and will not ever support a bill like this.

I'm delighted to see my original block upheld. Sort of. It really would have been an immense pain going back and redoing all the votes. This is just a game and there's no need to take it so seriously. That being said, I'm surprised the Court didn't just direct the RA to hold a vote on...

Exactly this.

I actually think I could support this.

I, Sanctaria, do hereby solemnly swear that during my term as Election Commissioner, I will uphold the ideals of Democracy, Freedom, and Justice of The Region of The North Pacific. I will use the powers and rights granted to me through The North Pacific Constitution and Legal Code in a legal...

As one of the Justices who ruled the minor error clause unconstitutional, it has been suggested that my providing a comment or two regarding this bill, and perhaps some background, would be helpful. The decision on the Minor Error Clause was relatively straightforward, and all three Justices...

I'll do it.

What Mouse said.

Nah I think we're good.

What position would I have to resign from to run for Delegacy :S

I'm in favour of this and will vote for if brought to the floor. Though GBM makes very good points, and the issue of stagnation is also a valid one, I find myself convinced by flem. We'll still have elections, we'll still be given the opportunity to boot someone out if the region stagnates. I...

No point hiding my motives, you'd all see through it anyway.

I'll be totally honest here. I signed the petition for two reasons: 1. I'm not a fan of Punk. He knows this. Most people in TNP know this. Not a secret. 2. People who hold trusted positions in TNP, whether it be in government or in forum administration, should at the least have a nation in or...

Boo. This punishes long-standing members of the region who are also active in other regions but is required to have their WA there for security purposes.

As a twice former TNP Minister for WA Affairs, I'd also recommend a No vote on this. EDIT: Indeed, please count this as a NAY vote when tallying.