[GA - AT VOTE - AGAINST] Responsible Usage of World Assembly Funds

Status
Not open for further replies.

SkyTheAquariusOP

Citizen
-
Pronouns
He/him
TNP Nation
Brisdon
Discord
skytheaquarius_op
ga.jpg

Responsible Usage of World Assembly Funds
Category: Political Stability | Strength: Mild
Proposed by: The Ice States, Co-authored by: Bisofeyri World Assembly Mission | Onsite Topic

Recognising the existence of WA General Fund, as one of the oldest resolutions passed by this chamber and which has served as an essential charter of the World Assembly's fiscal affairs, establishing the WA General Fund along with an agency to maintain it in the form of the General Accounting Office;

Cognisant, however, that the spending of the hard-earned resources pooled from member nations in the General Fund inherently requires a level of oversight both to prevent the use of shared funds even when a project can be paid for without such use, and the misuse of funds allocated to particular projects;

Noting that since the creation of the General Fund, many resolutions have allowed member nations to receive monies from the General Fund to conduct various projects, or have them conducted by the World Assembly, resulting in a range of mechanisms specifying when member nations may receive such funds from the two-pronged test of Quality in Health Services, to the approval process of Disaster Precautions and Responses, to the infamous mandates in Supporting and Valuing the Humanities which led to its repeal five months later;

Believing, for these reasons, that it is necessary to establish a standardised mechanism for when World Assembly funding may be granted and how member nations may use these funds, preventing wasteful spending on either side while allowing legislation to focus on the intricacies of its policy than on reiterating the same language as to funding; and

Desiring, therefore, to establish such a mechanism;

The World Assembly hereby enacts as follows.
  1. General Fund:Funds from the WA General Fund shall be used to cover all administrative expenses of the World Assembly, as well as projects of the World Assembly mandated by resolution where an alternative source of funding is not prescribed.
    1. Except where mandated otherwise by previously enacted, standing resolutions, the General Fund shall not provide monies for any project in a specific member nation if that member nation can reasonably fund the said project without World Assembly funds or otherwise posing a substantial burden to that member nation's economy or finances.

    2. Neither member nations nor the World Assembly may use monies from the General Fund assigned for a specific project or task for any purpose other than the said project or task. Diversion of existing funds may not be used to circumvent this.

  2. Emergency funding: Except as provided for by standing and previously enacted World Assembly law, in the event that the General Fund is insufficient to cover the operations of the World Assembly as per Section 1, the General Accounting Office shall have the authority to divert General Fund monies to projects of materially greater humanitarian, administrative or environmental importance than the projects from which such monies are diverted. Such diversion shall be with the ultimate goal of maximising the ability of the World Assembly to carry out its mandates.

  3. Reporting: The General Accounting Office, hereinafter GAO, shall annually publish a report detailing the nature and source of all monies held by the World Assembly, whether or not in the General Fund, the extent and nature of all spending using these funds, all investments made or maintained using World Assembly monies, the extent of member nations' contributions to World Assembly funds, and any other relevant information around the World Assembly's financial status. The GAO may redact information from such reports to the extent compelled by personal privacy or national or operational security.

  4. Interpretation: Section headings do not alter the meaning or interpretation of this resolution. Should a provision of this resolution contradict a past World Assembly resolution still in force, that previous resolution takes precedence. Absent clarification otherwise, terms in the singular include the plural thereof and vice versa.
Note: Only votes from TNP WA nations, NPA personnel, and those on NPA deployments will be counted. If you do not meet these requirements, please add (non-WA) or something of that effect to your vote. If you are on an NPA deployment without being formally registered as an NPA member, name your deployed nation in your vote.

Voting Instructions:
  • Vote For if you want the Delegate to vote For the resolution.
  • Vote Against if you want the Delegate to vote Against the resolution.
  • Vote Abstain if you want the Delegate to abstain from voting on this resolution.
  • Vote Present if you are personally abstaining from this vote.
Detailed opinions with your vote are appreciated and encouraged!

ForAgainstAbstainPresent
11400
 
Last edited:
Overview
This proposal seeks to establish a standardized mechanism for the allocation and use of funds from the WA General Fund, with the goal of preventing misuse and ensuring proper allocation of resources. It highlights specific conditions for when the funds can be used, establishes clear guidelines for emergency funding, and mandates annual financial reporting by the General Accounting Office (GAO).

Recommendation
While the intent to standardize and regulate the use of the WA General Fund is, indeed, commendable, the proposal has notable drawbacks. It imposes rigid rules that could restrict flexibility in urgent funding and unforeseen events. The prescribed limitations on fund allocation may impede the World Assembly’s ability to respond to emergencies and dynamic situations effectively. In addition to that, the focus on extensive reporting could burden the GAO with administrative tasks, rather than enhancing efficiency in operations.

For the above reasons, the Ministry of World Assembly Affairs recommends a vote against the GA proposal at vote, "Responsible Usage of World Assembly Funds".

This IFV was authored by Brisdon.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Actually, also the use of the word "otherwise" in clause (1)(a) is really hard to parse. (Or at least I find it hard to parse).
 
if that member nation can reasonably fund the said project without World Assembly funds or otherwise posing a substantial burden to that member nation's economy or finances.

Ability to pay is important and should be considered but this offers no conclusion on how that would actually be determined.

Against
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top