Saint Constantijn Broadcasting Association
Sint Constantijn Omroepvereniging
Saturday, 18th of June 2022
9:30 AM
Johannes van der Capellen blocks vote on Faursian devolution until 2062
Chancellor Johannes van der Capellen, in his Friday address to Parliament, has stated that the Social Democratic Party will not agree to a vote on Faursian devolution before 2062, after pressure from the Faursian National Party in demonstrations in the Faursian capital, Oudemirdum (known in Faursian as Aldemardum). Van der Capellen added; "if you don't like our decision, vote us out in 2026." The Chancellor assured that this was the view of the majority of the SDP and its MPs.
This was met with outrage from the FNP's leader, André Reitsma, who said that the move was "undemocratic" and "oppressive", and left-wing elements of Parliament have since sympathised with the FNP. Reitsma has also stated he is ready to negotiate with Van der Capellen over the topic.
Van der Capellen has used a section of the Aubervijan constitution, which states that the government maintains the right to protect Aubervijr and its boundaries by whatever means necessary. The government decided to prevent any decision on Faursian devolution by 40 years to act in the best interests of Aubervijr. The government, who remain opposed to the idea of Faursia becoming increasingly distant from Aubervijr, bearing in mind Faursia is considered an integrated part of Aubervijr - believe that granting devolution would lead to a potentially harmful domino effect.
Faursia isn't a single region either - its split between what is known as the Highlands (de Hogelanden) in the north and the more populated Faursia-Proper (Faursland-Juist) to the south, leading some to question what the government actually recognises as Faursia.
The government has also accused the FNP of a lack of planning, in terms of banking, education, environmental issues, housing, healthcare and agricultural-related topics if Faursia were to be granted devolution, and what powers would be reserved by the Aubervijan government.
An unofficial poll was held in Faursia in 2019, on the basis of what Faursians wanted; to be governed by Aubervijr, to have more representation in Parliament, to have devolution or to have independence. Although with a small turnout, the majority voted for devolution, followed by more representation.
The government suspects that the majority of Faursians consider themselves Aubervijan above all else, and that devolution wouldn't be an option to them. Reitsma responded by verifying this with a referendum, whether official or unofficial - with the Aubervijan government currently considering the option of an unofficial referendum to give the government a better idea on the position of Faursians.
Van der Capellen and his government remain increasingly stubborn, however and are less willing to budge or negotiate, but are open to 'proposals or ideas', should the FNP have any. The FNP, however, maintain two seats in Parliament and didn't appear on ballot papers in mainland Aubervijr, and have little voice in Parliament, giving the FNP a case to argue for further representation, or devolution, so a Faursian government could act in the best interests of Faursians.
Written by Tijpke Venema, Faursian correspondent.
Sint Constantijn Omroepvereniging
Saturday, 18th of June 2022
9:30 AM
Johannes van der Capellen blocks vote on Faursian devolution until 2062
Chancellor Johannes van der Capellen, in his Friday address to Parliament, has stated that the Social Democratic Party will not agree to a vote on Faursian devolution before 2062, after pressure from the Faursian National Party in demonstrations in the Faursian capital, Oudemirdum (known in Faursian as Aldemardum). Van der Capellen added; "if you don't like our decision, vote us out in 2026." The Chancellor assured that this was the view of the majority of the SDP and its MPs.
This was met with outrage from the FNP's leader, André Reitsma, who said that the move was "undemocratic" and "oppressive", and left-wing elements of Parliament have since sympathised with the FNP. Reitsma has also stated he is ready to negotiate with Van der Capellen over the topic.
Van der Capellen has used a section of the Aubervijan constitution, which states that the government maintains the right to protect Aubervijr and its boundaries by whatever means necessary. The government decided to prevent any decision on Faursian devolution by 40 years to act in the best interests of Aubervijr. The government, who remain opposed to the idea of Faursia becoming increasingly distant from Aubervijr, bearing in mind Faursia is considered an integrated part of Aubervijr - believe that granting devolution would lead to a potentially harmful domino effect.
Faursia isn't a single region either - its split between what is known as the Highlands (de Hogelanden) in the north and the more populated Faursia-Proper (Faursland-Juist) to the south, leading some to question what the government actually recognises as Faursia.
The government has also accused the FNP of a lack of planning, in terms of banking, education, environmental issues, housing, healthcare and agricultural-related topics if Faursia were to be granted devolution, and what powers would be reserved by the Aubervijan government.
An unofficial poll was held in Faursia in 2019, on the basis of what Faursians wanted; to be governed by Aubervijr, to have more representation in Parliament, to have devolution or to have independence. Although with a small turnout, the majority voted for devolution, followed by more representation.
The government suspects that the majority of Faursians consider themselves Aubervijan above all else, and that devolution wouldn't be an option to them. Reitsma responded by verifying this with a referendum, whether official or unofficial - with the Aubervijan government currently considering the option of an unofficial referendum to give the government a better idea on the position of Faursians.
Van der Capellen and his government remain increasingly stubborn, however and are less willing to budge or negotiate, but are open to 'proposals or ideas', should the FNP have any. The FNP, however, maintain two seats in Parliament and didn't appear on ballot papers in mainland Aubervijr, and have little voice in Parliament, giving the FNP a case to argue for further representation, or devolution, so a Faursian government could act in the best interests of Faursians.
Written by Tijpke Venema, Faursian correspondent.
Last edited: