[GA - FAILED] Peace and Sustainable Development

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hulldom

Winter Kingdom
-
-
Pronouns
He/Him/His
TNP Nation
Boston Castle
Discord
seathestarlesssky
ga.jpg

Peace and Sustainable Development
Category: Global Disarmament | Strength: Mild
Proposed by: Tinhampton, Co-authored by: Morover and Honeydewistania | Onsite Topic


Believing that all inhabitants of member states should be able to benefit from the rights they possess (including the right to development), yet

Recognising that all sapient rights are put in danger wherever unnecessary armed conflict occurs, and

Therefore seeking to disincentivise such conflict through means such as celebration, education and humanitarian aid regulation...

The General Assembly enacts as follows.
  1. Definitions:In this resolution:
    1. "development" means those non-violent acts taken with respect for sapient dignity which aim towards facilitating the achievement of all sapient rights,
    2. "sustainable development" means development which also aims towards the long-term protection of the natural environment or the reduction of unnecessary armed conflict, and
    3. "unnecessary armed conflict" means organised armed conflict that neither serves to protect a member state from attack nor is necessary to prevent practices (such as terrorism, genocide, and other crimes against humanity) that threaten the achievement of all sapient rights.
  2. The right to development: Members shall allow their inhabitants to engage in and benefit from development (including, in particular, sustainable development).
  3. Promotion of non-aggression: All members are encouraged to avoid unnecessary armed conflict.
  4. Aid for peace: Donors of humanitarian aid within member states shall not tie its use to the perpetuation of unnecessary armed conflict. Recipients of humanitarian aid within member states shall not use it to perpetuate unnecessary armed conflict, and are further urged to use it for its specified purpose and for the benefit of as many of their inhabitants as possible.
  5. Education: Members are strongly urged to educate all of their inhabitants about the relationship between peace, sustainable development, and sapient rights, and the important role that each of these factors play in helping to protect the other two.
  6. Peace Prize:The World Assembly Peace Prize (hereinafter the Prize) is established. To that effect, the WA Commission on Human Rights is tasked with:
    1. receiving nominations for the Prize from anyone who works as a head of state or government, legislator, or professor in any member state, in addition to any leaders of member state delegations to the World Assembly; and disregarding nominations with the effect of such individuals nominating themselves, the entity who directly employs them or any other person currently being employed by that entity for the Prize,
    2. awarding the Prize each year to that person or group of people resident in any member state who has been nominated in accordance with Article f(i) (although nothing in this section requires that all such nominees be awarded the Prize),
    3. basing its decision to award the Prize to any given person or group solely on whether, in its view, they have:
      • demonstrably contributed more than any other such person or group in the previous year to the resolution or prevention of major conflicts between and within nations which involved or could have realistically involved large-scale acts of violence,
      • made such contributions while respecting all sapient rights protected by international law, as well as avoiding violence and the perpetuation of war crimes, and
      • worked towards the universal, non-violent promotion and achievement of all sapient rights while doing so,
    4. rewarding (each of) the winner(s) of the Prize in each year with a gold-plated silver medal weighing one ounce and measuring one-and-a-half inches in diameter, which shall have on its obverse the words "WA PEACE PRIZE - WITH PEACE COMES FREEDOM" surrounding the logo of the World Assembly, and on its reverse nothing, and
    5. rescinding the status of any Prize winner as such (which may include ordering the return of any rewards bestowed upon them under Article f(iv) to it) if, in its view, they have carried out acts that are contrary to the intentions of Article f(iii).

Co-authored by: Morover and Honeydewistania/
Note: Only votes from TNP WA nations and NPA personnel will be counted. If you do not meet these requirements, please add (non-WA) or something of that effect to your vote.
Voting Instructions:
  • Vote For if you want the Delegate to vote For the resolution.
  • Vote Against if you want the Delegate to vote Against the resolution.
  • Vote Abstain if you want the Delegate to abstain from voting on this resolution.
  • Vote Present if you are personally abstaining from this vote.
Detailed opinions with your vote are appreciated and encouraged!


ForAgainstAbstainPresent
101000
"Peace and Stable Development" has failed 5,068 votes (32.7%) to 10,417 (67.3%).
 
Last edited:
IFV

Overview
This resolution seeks to establish a World Assembly Peace Prize that would operate in a manner similar to the real-life Nobel Peace Prize. It also creates a "right to development" protecting "non-violent acts taken with respect for sapient dignity which aim towards facilitating the achievement of all sapient rights" and stops member states from permitting humanitarian aid to assist in the perpetuation of "unnecessary armed conflict". Lastly, it also establishes non-binding directives regarding peace-oriented education and abstaining from engaging in wars of aggression.

Recommendation
This proposal is clearly ineffective when it comes to tackling the very real issues of preventing wars of aggression and the atrocities associated with them. The so-called "right to development" introduced within the text does not encapsulate anything that would not already be covered by extant General Assembly legislation. Nor is it sufficiently clear with actions that have trade-offs between different groups.

The clauses pertaining to educating inhabitants about peace and sustainable development and encouraging member states to refrain from wars of aggression are non-binding. And the idea that a nation with opportunity to maximise its power would reconsider its aggressive tendencies merely because people taught them about peace is naïve at best.

The final piece of the proposal is its most inconsequential: the World Assembly Peace Prize. The Peace Prize utterly fails to prevent wars of aggression due to its inability to substantively impact affairs on the ground, serving as little more than an extension of soft diplomacy. Even if useful, these prizes also can serve to whitewash the atrocities of people with diplomatic clout or who change their views after the fact.

For the above reasons, the Ministry of World Assembly Affairs recommends a vote Against the General Assembly Resolution at vote, "Peace And Sustainable Development".


Our Voting Recommendation Dispatch--Please Upvote!
 
Last edited:
For. Seems mostly harmless to have a nice peace prize. Reminds me of those nice looking "participation trophies" handed out to everyone these days, but I guess kind of harmless.
 
Last edited:
This proposal does nothing really but will this prize into existence. It's hard for me not to see this as a minor form of meta-gaming. Against [Non-WA].
 
Against. The only action I see is that this proposal aims to legislate the awarding of a "peace prize". Something I can't see the WA wasting money on, despite its nobel cause. The rest of the clauses don't have any substance nor have any effect in reality, making this proposal effectively useless.
 
Article f(v) :P
That clause is vague in the extreme, considering it provides absolutely zero guidelines on actually revoking the prize, but rather cops to anything “contrary to the intentions of Article f(iii)” whatever that means.

I remain opposed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top