[SC - DROPPED OUT] Liberate Sparrow

Status
Not open for further replies.
V

Veltvalen

Yes
TNP Nation
Veltvalen
Discord
BobOjmdg #6297
sc.jpg

Liberate Sparrow
Category: Liberation | Target: Sparrow
Proposed by: Bradfordsborough | Onsite Topic​

The Security Council,

In recognition that Sparrow is an ancient region with a long and storied past that has impacted the national identities of hundreds of nations throughout world history,

And in standing resolute against the cruel implementation of long-term delegate-imposed barriers,

And with the belief that all nations of good standing within this body should have the right to participate in the affairs of their ancestral homelands,

The Security Council hereby liberates Sparrow.
Click to expand...
Note: Only votes from TNP WA nations and NPA personnel will be counted. If you do not meet these requirements, please add (non-WA) or something of that effect to your vote.
Voting Instructions:
  • Vote For if you want the Delegate to vote For the resolution.
  • Vote Against if you want the Delegate to vote Against the resolution.
  • Vote Abstain if you want the Delegate to abstain from voting on this resolution.
  • Vote Present if you are personally abstaining from this vote.
Detailed opinions with your vote are appreciated and encouraged!
[TR][TD] For [/TD][TD] Against [/TD][TD] Abstain [/TD][TD] Present [/TD][/TR][TR][TD]2[/TD][TD]6[/TD][TD]0[/TD][TD]0[/TD][/TR]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Against - but not due to the content. I believe there's a pressing historical reason to liberate regions locked down by raiders and griefers unless those regions were fascist, destructive themselves or otherwise reprehensible in some way.

However, it appears Sparrow's founder is Ivan Moldavi - who is likely easily contactable by various people should it be required to do so, which makes any attempt at liberating the region from his clutches very unlikely to succeed. The nations residing there are relatively high influence and a prolonged occupation would be necessary to be able to remove them. I don't view this as something with a good chance at success and I'm against for that reason.
 
Zash:
Against
Click to expand...
As this vote was lodged AFTER the proposal dropped out of the queue. Gonna have to discount it.

In other news, this proposal has failed to achieve the necessary approvals to enter the formal queue and has this dropped out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top