[SC - FAILED] Condemn Quebecshire

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hulldom

Winter Kingdom
-
Pronouns
He/Him/His
TNP Nation
Boston Castle
Discord
seathestarlesssky
sc.jpg

Condemn Quebecshire
Category: Condemnation | Target: Quebecshire
Proposed by: A Melted Instant Pot Lid | No Onsite Topic​


APPRECIATING that the security council should always spend its time on important resolutions

BELIEVING that condemning quebecshire would be an important resolution

NOTING quebecshire is the evil founder of the league of conservative nations

HORRIFIED at quebecshire’s constant suppression of rights and speech both within their region and the defender faction

SHOCKED by how mean quebecshire was to Parxland

OFFENDED by quebecshire’s trickery as they are not in fact located in Quebec

DEEPLY OFFENDED by quebecshire’s further trickery in naming the region “the league of conservative nations” and not “the league of liberal nations” as it is full of liberals

AGHAST at quebecshire’s repeated and nightly infringements on regional sovereignty by moving puppet nations into sovereign regions in attempt to subvert these regions and elect foreign forces as delegate

HORRIFIED OH WAIT ALREADY USED THAT at the toxic culture quebecshire’s has fostered in this “league” of conservative nations

WONDERING WHY quebecshire has consistently attacked and antagonized innocent nations such as Varanius

HEREBY CONDEMNS QUEBECSHIRE


Note: Only votes from TNP WA nations and NPA personnel will be counted. If you do not meet these requirements, please add (non-WA) or something of that effect to your vote.
Voting Instructions:
  • Vote For if you want the Delegate to vote For the resolution.
  • Vote Against if you want the Delegate to vote Against the resolution.
  • Vote Abstain if you want the Delegate to abstain from voting on this resolution.
  • Vote Present if you are personally abstaining from this vote.
Detailed opinions with your vote are appreciated and encouraged!

[TR][TD] For [/TD][TD]Against[/TD][TD] Abstain [/TD][TD] Present [/TD][/TR][TR][TD]6[/TD][TD]9[/TD][TD]0[/TD][TD]2[/TD][/TR]
 
Last edited:
"HORRIFIED OH WAIT ALREADY USED THAT "

Greatest thing ever. Truly represents the overwhelmingly abundant quality in which this SC proposal brings forth.

"For"
 
I think I'm missing some context or history. Present
All the context you need is that the author of this horrible proposal and all delegates who approved this are trolling the WA and everyone who is voting for is doing the same. For.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top