wait i thought you're telling us what you plan to do, not the other way around. am i missing something?at leat tell me A way to allow you to RP with more than 2 people non officialy
look i am just a pigeonwait i thought you're telling us what you plan to do, not the other way around. am i missing something?
Shouldn't you consult Railroad Crossing? If you are not sure about something in their campaign, why not bring them here to answer the questions that you can't.look i am just a pigeon
Well I read that wrong.If anyone else wants jobs i will give a hand
Also what happened to the Minister of WA Affairs Position?Well I read that wrong.
No cursingFucking hell mcm
I believe that their nation is not in TNP.Also what happened to the Minister of WA Affairs Position?
Yes it is. I talk on the RMB EVeryday,I believe that their nation is not in TNP.
shows your Minister of WA Affairs nation in the Region "First World Order".https://www.nationstates.net/page=dispatch/id=1404093 read this it explains everything.
@Railroad Crossing
Why have a prime minister?
How would that work legally?
Are you ok with a prime minister that started an international incident? Lied about it? Tried to harm the reputation of other players? Broke several laws?
Your "Cabinet" contains members who are not in the region and are not citizens. Are you ok with that?
You want to change the RP Rules. How are you going to do that? Will you override the moderators?
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand I suckAs the Greitbart endorsed anti-establishment candidate, I declare that railroad crossing is a tool of the deepstate establishment oligarchy. I shall do absolutely everything to defeat them (that is to say, nothing).
sounds rudeCan we have a platform from @Railroad Crossing themself, and not from their mouthpiece @Pigeonstan? Railroad Crossing is starting to feel more of a figurehead than an actual candidate.
it was removed so no one could endort 2000 nations and overtake the delegatesounds rude
I need something to boost my popularity
it can't be with roleplay
Also i have a question
When was the endorsement cap removed, if there was even one
that does not make sense.it was removed so no one could endort 2000 nations and overtake the delegate
whaa is datthat does not make sense.
How about we do the thing they do like in war zones
We shall do the same thing, but give them one more chance. We will make a telegram that says:whaa is dat
also we are going to establish more embassies
Am I reading this wrong, or does it say the embassy request was rejected because they did have a forum embassy?Your embassy was rejected because you did have a forum embassy with the North Pacific.
In order to have embassies you must come to [LINK].
i thought you were a non politicaly active ravenAm I reading this wrong, or does it say the embassy request was rejected because they did have a forum embassy?
oh wait woopsAm I reading this wrong, or does it say the embassy request was rejected because they did have a forum embassy?
Well, I'm not planning on holding a government office anytime soon.oh i thought you were stepping into the TNP political scene
WHY IS THATWell this is a dumpster fire.
How would an endo cap, royal titles, or land grants "push our region in an explosive new direction"?As Delegate, I will vote against every proposal to hit the voting floor, work towards consolidating Ministries into a vertical power structure, look into implementing an endo cap (50 seems like a good starting point), and add royal titles and land grants to executive positions.
An endo cap for every nation (except me and my cabinet, of course) would ensure that any troublemakers can be explosively punted in an exciting new direction.How would an endo cap, royal titles, or land grants "push our region in an explosive new direction"?
It's a lively discussion if I find it amusing. When I post on the RMB, I expect a hearty "All Hail!" Otherwise, it's a cruel attack.I would argue that people who flame are not creating a debate, instead, they cause harm to others who are actually trying to have a lively discussion. But, if you so choose to allow recruiting and flaming within the RMB, where will you draw the line between lively discussion and cruel attacks?
I would just so happen to be showering in the Delegate's Mansion at the moment (which I will repaint a lovely shade of pink).If you find a discussion lively, but Nationstates Moderation finds the "discussion" obscene, illegal, threatening, malicious, defamatory, or spam and thus removes the post, would you protest the moderations' decision, or play along?
I believe that protesting the decisions of a higher power, however incomprehensible the reasoning behind such decisions may be, does not ultimately serve the interests of the region as a whole.I'm sorry, but you have dodged my question. I will repeat, Would you protest the moderations' decision, or play along?
Their block buttons work, and they can just not pay attention to the RMB. I'd encourage these level-headed people to apply for the Executive Staff, so they have even less reason to worry about the RMB on a daily basis.How would you respond to those who are harmed by flaming, and would protest your use of flaming as amusement?