- Pronouns
- She/Her They/Them
- TNP Nation
- vivanco
- Discord
- ra#9794
Just in time after an election, the start of a brand new case!
As you can see here, @Siwale has formally accused the delegate, @mcmasterdonia of Gross Misconduct.
For those who don't know what Gross Misconduct is, it can be found within the Legal Code:
For that, they claim that the delegate has broken their oath (given as evidence in the case) for promoting themselves to be the WA Secretary-General, a spot that has little to no actual value.
I see one fatal flaw for the accusation: The Form.
In order to present criminal charges, such as this one, there are rules to follow: the Court Rules and Procedures.
The form presented upon the court by the accusation is a criminal complaint, not an indictment. So, in my opinion, just by the formulation of this, the court shouldn't accept such topic to discuss.
On the matter at hand, however, it's a bit more uncertain whenever there was Gross Misconduct. But I don't believe so, for they would be acting in the moreover benefit of the region, and not for personal gain, which would still be good with the oath.
But that's just me.
As you can see here, @Siwale has formally accused the delegate, @mcmasterdonia of Gross Misconduct.
For those who don't know what Gross Misconduct is, it can be found within the Legal Code:
"Gross Misconduct" is defined as the violation of an individual's legally mandated sworn oath, either willfully or through negligence.
For that, they claim that the delegate has broken their oath (given as evidence in the case) for promoting themselves to be the WA Secretary-General, a spot that has little to no actual value.
I see one fatal flaw for the accusation: The Form.
In order to present criminal charges, such as this one, there are rules to follow: the Court Rules and Procedures.
All criminal charges brought before the Court must be presented in the form of an indictment.
On the matter at hand, however, it's a bit more uncertain whenever there was Gross Misconduct. But I don't believe so, for they would be acting in the moreover benefit of the region, and not for personal gain, which would still be good with the oath.
But that's just me.
Last edited: