Fontainberg
Undertale Weeb
- Pronouns
- They/them
- TNP Nation
- Fontainberg
- Discord
- Avalaise#6417
1. What law, government policy, or action (taken by a government official) do you request that the Court review?
Your Honor, I request that you review Angshire's accession into government positions and his continued allowance within The North Pacific community.
2. What portions of the Constitution, Bill of Rights, Legal Code, or other legal document do you believe has been violated by the above? How so?
Angshire intentionally hid his previous identity as Crown Isles in order to protect himself from getting banned/ejected from the region, and to advance into important government roles.
3. Are there any prior rulings of the Court that support your request for review? Which ones, and how?
None which I know of.
4. Please establish your standing by detailing how you, personally, have been adversely affected. If you are requesting a review of a governmental action, you must include how any rights or freedoms of yours have been violated. If you are submitting this request in your capacity as the Attorney General or their designee, please note that here instead.
Allowing Angshire to quietly slip past ban evasion without any reasonable punishment not only sets a bad precedent for future ban evaders, but it also runs the risk of Angshire re-offending, given his willingness to intentionally deceive the community as a whole of his past.
5. Do you have any further information you wish to submit to the Court with your request?
The petitioner sincerely hopes that you look into Angshire's unbanning, as well as his allowance to serve in government roles, given his troubled history with the North Pacific and his deception of the community as a whole.
Your Honor, I request that you review Angshire's accession into government positions and his continued allowance within The North Pacific community.
2. What portions of the Constitution, Bill of Rights, Legal Code, or other legal document do you believe has been violated by the above? How so?
Angshire intentionally hid his previous identity as Crown Isles in order to protect himself from getting banned/ejected from the region, and to advance into important government roles.
3. Are there any prior rulings of the Court that support your request for review? Which ones, and how?
None which I know of.
4. Please establish your standing by detailing how you, personally, have been adversely affected. If you are requesting a review of a governmental action, you must include how any rights or freedoms of yours have been violated. If you are submitting this request in your capacity as the Attorney General or their designee, please note that here instead.
Allowing Angshire to quietly slip past ban evasion without any reasonable punishment not only sets a bad precedent for future ban evaders, but it also runs the risk of Angshire re-offending, given his willingness to intentionally deceive the community as a whole of his past.
5. Do you have any further information you wish to submit to the Court with your request?
The petitioner sincerely hopes that you look into Angshire's unbanning, as well as his allowance to serve in government roles, given his troubled history with the North Pacific and his deception of the community as a whole.
