[GA - Failed] Repeal: "Promotion of Recycling"

Status
Not open for further replies.

Gorundu

I finished my Chinese homework
-
-
-
Pronouns
he/him
TNP Nation
Gorundu
Discord
an_dr_ew

ga.jpg

Repeal: "Promotion of Recycling"
Category: Repeal | GA #483
Proposed by: Biscany | No Onsite Topic​

General Assembly Resolution #483 “Promotion of Recycling” (Category: Environmental; Industry Affected: All Businesses - Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

The World Assembly,

Cognizant
of the dire decadency of the modern global environment and its state, the efforts of GA#483's author to both combat this and to promote international recycling, and as well as the author's expressed knowledge of the fiscal implications of their resolution;

Observing, however, that the language in Clause 3 stating: "[The World Assembly hereby] requires its member nations to encourage participation in recycling and salvaging..." is vague and problematically ambiguous, being left to the interpretation of affected member nations; allowing for the possibility of loophole perversion of this aforementioned clause; sowing seeds of circumvention to the clause's requirement and therefore most possibly rendering it profoundly weak or completely impotent;

Perturbed by the "economical concerns" as referenced in the bill's introduction, with sight that the requirement for a member nation to encourage recycling by means of "legislation, incentives, or penalization," as stated (also) in Clause 3, creates abusive regulations; allowing larger businesses who can likely afford to abide by these standards to oppress their competition, restraining the growth of smaller businesses who may struggle with keeping their production up to code, no matter how minor the recycling and salvaging required may be, and/or punishing the latter; therefore eventually generating an unhealthy, unjust economic growth gap between small and large business;

Thereby concluding that, unfortunately, GA#483's 3rd Clause festers cumbersome logistical issues along with the opportune loopholes thereof, and breeds divide between small and big businesses ex its added environmental requirements which supersede its professed environmental importance;

Further concluding that this bill falls short of accomplishing what it was originally created for in a profound manner;

Thusly failing to see this bill being enforced effectively;

Hereby,
  • Ardently wishes for a new, more effective and more thorough proposal to take the place of GA#483 in The General Assembly;
  • Views this international body further sustaining this resolution as unnecessary and repeals General Assembly Resolution #483.
Voting Instructions:
  • Vote For if you want the Delegate to vote For the resolution.
  • Vote Against if you want the Delegate to vote Against the resolution.
  • Vote Abstain if you want the Delegate to abstain from voting on this resolution.
  • Vote Present if you are personally abstaining from this vote.

Detailed opinions with your vote are appreciated and encouraged!
 
Against. Classic weak arguments on "ambiguous" wording and some extreme interpretation that "legislation, incentives or penalization" somehow creates abusive regulations. The original author @Greifenstolz is working on a much more comprehensive one with @Imperium Anglorum.
 
Against. I simply do not see the claimed vagueness or how one could reasonably avoid the mandate of the resolution. As to the fact that difficulty may follow for businesses in complying and that larger businesses may enjoy economies of scale allowing them to better meet that difficulty, that is an acceptable consequence when set against the objectives of the resolution.

EDIT: “resolution” in place of “proposal”
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top