[GA - Passed] Preventing Groundwater Contamination

Status
Not open for further replies.

bowloftoast

Not Just For Breakfast
Discord
bowloftoast

ga.jpg

Preventing Groundwater Contamination
Category: Environmental | Industry Affected: All Businesses - Mild
Proposed by: Wallenburg | Onsite Topic
Celebrating past efforts to raise awareness of the importance of water resource conservation and protection, and to implement policies to reduce overuse and contamination of naturally occurring water resources,

Concerned that few of these efforts have addressed groundwater sources in any manner, even though underground aquifers provide the majority of water used and consumed in member states,

Noting that transboundary aquifers are very common, and the management and protection of their resources inherently represents an international issue,

Recognizing that nearly all member nations depend on aquifers for the purposes of agriculture, industry, and domestic consumption, and that a risk to the potability or usability of these essential water resources presents a risk to the prosperity and survival of countless inhabitants of member states,

Understanding that while many aquifers may be less prone to contamination than surface water sources, few technologies exist to resolve groundwater contamination after its effects become deleterious, and many shallow, consolidated, unconfined, or overexerted aquifers do not sufficiently benefit from the filtration effects of surrounding soils to prevent contamination,

Resolving to reduce contamination of vulnerable aquifers by saltwater and artificial pollutants, including pathogens, nitrates, phosphates, toxic and nuclear wastes, and artificial herbicides and pesticides,

The World Assembly hereby:

  1. Tasks the International Bureau of Water Safety with researching and consolidating information on the size, distribution, and characteristics of groundwater resources, and issuing recommendations for the protection and conservation of these resources for reliable, long-term use,

  2. Requires member states to plan future land use so that agricultural, industrial, and transportation pollutants will not present any measurable threat to the utility and potability of aquifers,

  3. Mandates the implementation of regulations to protect groundwater resources near or interacting with sinkholes and cenotes on agricultural developments, including but not limited to:
    1. The growth or construction of a physical barrier around the mouth of the sinkhole or cenote, at a distance from the edge appropriate for the conditions of the sinkhole site, in order to minimize the accumulation of pollutants within the sinkhole or cenote,

    2. Diversion of all surface runoff around or away from the sinkhole or cenote,

    3. Cessation of application of fertilizers, herbicides, or pesticides in the vicinity of the sinkhole or cenote,

    4. Restriction of all activity within the enclosed area of the sinkhole or cenote to scientific and recreational activities individually reviewed by a jurisdictional authority, determined to present no measurable threat to any groundwater system, and carried out by individuals possessing permits to perform those activities,
  4. Mandates protection of wildlife within all naturally occurring underground drainage systems, and recommends communication with the WA Endangered Species Committee for specific means by which to preserve the ecosystems contained within,

  5. Recommends that development of urban or industrial infrastructure upon evaporite formations, especially carbonates, in cases where acidic dissolution has resulted in extensive underground drainage systems, be limited as much as possible, and requires member states to institute additional limitations on industrial and agricultural activity to further prevent contamination of these particularly vulnerable aquifers,

  6. Requires all wells constructed over unconfined aquifers to undergo regular inspections for contamination of the groundwater below, and prohibits the use or disposal of potential contaminants in or nearby the opening of any such well,

  7. Requires member states to limit extraction from each aquifer to a maximum of the rate at which each aquifer is projected to saturate, and urges member states to further limit extraction from aquifers bordering saltwater fronts, so that the pressure of the freshwater column is maintained at a safe depth for long-term environmental health and reliable extraction, and so that high-density saltwater does not upcone into the freshwater column.
Voting Instructions:
  • Vote For if you want the Delegate to vote For the resolution.
  • Vote Against if you want the Delegate to vote Against the resolution.
  • Vote Abstain if you want the Delegate to abstain from voting on this resolution.
  • Vote Present if you are personally abstaining from this vote.
Detailed opinions with your vote are appreciated and encouraged!
 
Well-written and well researched, this proposal takes a holistic approach to the protection of subterranean freshwater supplies, rightfully treating aquifers as a universal resource, transcending national boundaries. Given the absence of technology to purify contaminated groundwater, the proposal calls for common-sense preventative measures. The mandates outlined are no more strident than they need to be yet leave little quarter for those who would pollute with impunity. The additional emphasis on conservation will ensure against depletion, guaranteeing a renewable supply of fresh water for the foreseeable future.

For this reason The Ministry of World Assembly Affairs recommends a vote For this proposal.
 
Last edited:
For

(I'll hold off on voting until we have a few more responses)
 
For, wholeheartedly
Safe to say that the era of large-polluting companies and laissez-faire development is drawing to a rapid close, and these are precisely the sort of comprehensive measures that will be needed moving forward. The proposal is no less harsh in its mandates than it needs to be to protect that which essential to life. Yes, it will mean nations must rethink where and how they develop industry and extract resources. Yes, it will likely cost more to develop more responsible ways to do so. Yes, it will mean that new methods for weed and pest controls must be developed in agriculture. These new mandates will drive innovation, and yes, for those for whom it is a priority, there will be economic benefits in that innovation to offset the costs of abandoning old practices. Water must be viewed as a universal resource, transcending borders, and this proposal comes from that mindset. Well researched and thoughtfully crafted.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top