[GA, Failed] Convention On Domestic Partnerships [Complete]

Fawkes

TNPer

ga.jpg

Convention on Domestic Partnerships
Category: Human Rights | Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Auralia | Onsite Topic


Acknowledging the significance of marriages and similar relationships in numerous member states,

Reaffirming the right to sexual privacy previously guaranteed by this Assembly,

Believing that an individual should generally be free to enter into a domestic partnership with others, to raise the children for whom they are responsible in the context of such a partnership, and to dissolve such a partnership if necessary,

Seeking to protect these rights while respecting the sociocultural and religious differences between member states,

The General Assembly,

  1. Requires member states to permit a legally competent individual to:
    • enter into a domestic partnership with other legally competent individuals and thereby share a common domestic life together, with the mutual informed consent of all parties,
    • provide for, safeguard, and educate the children for whom the individual is legally responsible, in the context of a domestic partnership, and
    • dissolve a domestic partnership to which the individual is a party, regardless of whether the other parties consent to such dissolution;
  2. Directs member states to provide appropriate assistance to individuals in the pursuit of any of the above, with the understanding that member states are free to treat domestic partnerships as a private contractual affair if they so choose;
  3. Further requires member states to ensure that, upon the dissolution of a domestic partnership, all parties:
    • shall not be subject to disadvantageous treatment by a member state simply by virtue of seeking the dissolution without the consent of the other parties,
    • shall not lose legal guardianship of a child simply by virtue of the dissolution, and
    • shall receive an equitable portion of shared assets in accordance with the terms of the partnership and relevant law;
  4. Prohibits member states from engaging in unjust discrimination in the application of the above provisions, including but not limited to disadvantageous treatment on the basis of the race, sex, gender, sexual orientation, or legal mutual sexual activity of the parties to the domestic partnership;
  5. Clarifies that nothing in this resolution shall be interpreted so as to prevent a member state from:
    • removing legal guardianship of a child from an individual or enforcing the terms of a child custody agreement when a competent tribunal determines that it would be in the best interests of the child, or
    • enforcing lawful restrictions on habitation or movement, such as imprisonment;
  6. Reserves to member states the right to define, recognize, support, or regulate marriages, domestic partnerships, and similar relationships, to the extent permitted by this and previous World Assembly resolutions;
  7. Further clarifies that nothing in this resolution prohibits the World Assembly from:
    • requiring the recognition of foreign marriages, domestic partnerships, and similar relationships that are otherwise valid in a member state's law,
    • regulating the distribution of assets following the dissolution of a marriage, domestic partnership, or similar relationship with international elements, or
    • engaging in generally applicable regulation that may affect marriages, domestic partnerships, and similar relationships as a secondary effect, such as regulation on sexual consent, legal guardianship, or contractual agreements or unions in general.

Voting Instructions:
  • Vote For if you want the Delegate to vote For the resolution.
  • Vote Against if you want the Delegate to vote Against the resolution.
  • Vote Abstain if you want the Delegate to abstain from voting on this resolution.
  • Vote Present if you are personally abstaining from this vote.

Detailed opinions with your vote are appreciated and encouraged!

[wavote=the_north_pacific,ga]2017_10_22_convention_on_domestic_partnerships[/wavote]
[wavote=world,ga]2017_10_22_convention_on_domestic_partnerships[/wavote]
 
This resolution grants same-sex couples most of responsibilities and rights given to different-sex couples. Although, it reserves member states the right to define marriage as they see fit, which potentially allows them to label and define same-sex couples as "different". While different-sex couples will be married, the same-sex couples will be in a "domestic partnership" under this resolution. Thus, given that marriage equality includes the right to be able to call your union a "marriage", which is not granted under this resolution, and since nations should not be able to subjugate same-sex couples to the ignominy of being different, we demand a resolution that explicitly gives same-sex couples the full right to marriage, having the mentioned concerns covered.

For these reasons, the Ministry of World Assembly Affairs recommends a vote against this resolution.
 
Against.

Change Note
[border=#ee4a2d,1,solid]Upon further consideration and reading Sanctarias' draft proposal, I must change my vote to 'Against'[/border]
 
Against

Reason: Should've just gone the extra length and required consenting parties to just throw their equitable assets into a trust. Good intentions, crappy execution.
 
Notice: Understanding that the repeal of GA Res. 410 "Marriage Equality" will bring successive and numerous replacement resolutions, and that the last drafts have shown nothing but ambiguity (according to what is posted in the NS forum, and to those proposals already submitted to GA), I would like to post the draft that Sanctaria is currently developing, on behalf of the WALL (which TNP is part of). Feel free to comment on the linked thread if you have doubts or comments to improve the text, so that we can finally get out of this loop:
https://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=426508
 
Against. This is a sham masquerading as marriage equality.
 
I agree with all. If same sex marriage is not as equal as opposite sex marriage, it shouldn't be allowed. I hope that one day we can get a truly equal marriage system. Against
 
Voting on this resolution has ended.

Thanks to those nations who cast their votes. Your participation is a great help to the region.

This topic has been locked and sent to the Archives for safekeeping. If you would like this topic to be re-opened for further discussion, please contact the WA Delegate, a Global Moderator, or an Administrator for assistance. Thank you.
 
Back
Top