[GA, Passed] Convention on Internet Neutrality [Complete]

Sil Dorsett

The Belt Collector
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
TNP Nation
sil_dorsett
Discord
sildorsett
Category: Free Trade
Strength: Mild
Proposed by: Auralia
Onsite Topic

Recognizing the critical importance of the internet to international business, trade, education, and communications,

Aware that the internet often has no centralized governance, and that access to the internet is largely provided by private sector entities in many World Assembly member nations,

Believing that limited international regulation of the internet is necessary to prevent anti-competitive behaviour by internet service providers,

Seeking, however, to prohibit the World Assembly from engaging in more intrusive regulation in future,

The General Assembly,

  1. Defines "the internet", for the purposes of this resolution, as any system of interconnected telecommunications networks using a packet-switched, end-to-end protocol to communicate between endpoints that is:
    • generally accessible to the public, and
    • intended to be used by the public to publish, distribute, and use content, applications, and services;
  2. Further defines "internet service provider" as any entity that provides access to the internet as a service to the general public, for free or in exchange for compensation, but only if the service can reasonably be used in a residence or workplace;
  3. Declares that member nations must require internet service providers to:
    • allow authorized users of their network to access and use the legal internet content, applications, and services of their choice within the bandwidth limits and quality of service of their service plan,
    • allow authorized users of their network to connect to the internet using a legal device of their choice,
    • clearly inform authorized users of their network of any discrimination between legal internet content, applications, and services on their network, and
    • refrain from unjust discrimination between legal internet content, applications, and services on their network, including but not limited to discrimination that has a substantial anti-competitive effect;
  4. Recommends that member states extend the mandate of their respective telecommunications or antitrust regulatory agencies or other appropriate bodies with the enforcement of internet neutrality, especially the timely investigation of consumer complaints regarding potential violations of applicable internet neutrality regulations;
  5. Further declares that member states have the right to determine for themselves whether to adopt more restrictive internet neutrality regulations, within the confines of this and previous World Assembly resolutions;
  6. Clarifies that nothing in this resolution:
    • creates an affirmative obligation for internet service providers to provide access to their networks or to refrain from charging for access to their networks,
    • requires internet service providers to, through action or inaction, endanger national security, law enforcement activities, or the security or stability of their network, or
    • prohibits member nations from regulating internet-enabled devices or internet content, applications, and services.

Voting Instructions:
  • Vote For if you want the Delegate to vote For the resolution.
  • Vote Against if you want the Delegate to vote Against the resolution.
  • Vote Abstain if you want the Delegate to abstain from voting on this resolution.
  • Vote Present if you are personally abstaining from this vote.

Detailed opinions with your vote are appreciated and encouraged!


[wavote=the_north_pacific,ga]2017_09_12_convention_on_internet_neutrality[/wavote]
[wavote=world,ga]2017_09_12_convention_on_internet_neutrality[/wavote]
 
Network neutrality encourages ISPs to provide the same treatment to all users and services, making it easier to communicate, do business, and other activities without the intervention of a third party. This resolution encourages healthy competition between ISPs, while protecting users from changes that affect quality of service without prior notification. It also calls on member nations to regulate deeper issues through their own laws, so that privacy issues and specialized/priority services are not ignored.

For these reasons, the Ministry of World Assembly Affairs recommends a vote for the resolution.
 
For.

After a second review, I found no merit to go against. It is absolutely compatible with the premise that national governments must regulate trade/services within their jurisdiction, speaking of current legislation. Even considering that it does not address the issue of specialized services (which do not necessarily have to affect the internet bandwidth, being a source of additional income for ISPs), I believe that this could be covered at the discretion of each nation.
 
Voting on this resolution has ended.

Thanks to those nations who cast their votes. Your participation is a great help to the region.

This topic has been locked and sent to the Archives for safekeeping. If you would like this topic to be re-opened for further discussion, please contact the WA Delegate, a Global Moderator, or an Administrator for assistance. Thank you.
 
Voting on this resolution has ended.

Thanks to those nations who cast their votes. Your participation is a great help to the region.

This topic has been locked and sent to the Archives for safekeeping. If you would like this topic to be re-opened for further discussion, please contact the WA Delegate, a Global Moderator, or an Administrator for assistance. Thank you.
 
Back
Top