No analogies needed:Syrixia:But don't you think TNP needs a little modernizing? Something to make it sleek, like 2015ish? Here's an analogy.
Then how come TSP changed theirs? How come TEP changed their flag? If change for the sake of change is unprofessional, I cite those examples as proof against that.Lord Ravenclaw:Does it? Well, if you say so.
I'd rather a professional approach, which belies our age, our history and our position in NationStates. That seal is universally recognised in NationStates. It has flew over The North Pacific for a decade and is a symbol of this region's dedication to democracy.
I do not want to change the seal, or our flag. Change for the sake of change should be discouraged.
See?Piscivore:No analogies needed:Syrixia:But don't you think TNP needs a little modernizing? Something to make it sleek, like 2015ish? Here's an analogy.
http://schrivers.blogspot.com/2015/04/branding-evolution-of-logo.html
So should "but it's always been that way" be discouraged. Being ten years old is as good an argument for freshening up and modernizing as it is for clinging to something awkward and ugly.Lord Ravenclaw:Does it? Well, if you say so.
I'd rather a professional approach, which belies our age, our history and our position in NationStates. That seal is universally recognised in NationStates. It has flew over The North Pacific for a decade and is a symbol of this region's dedication to democracy.
I do not want to change the seal, or our flag. Change for the sake of change should be discouraged.
That's kind of rude.Lord Ravenclaw:You will just ignore everyone who disagrees with you (as per normal), so I shall not waste my time debating with you.
Lord Ravenclaw:That seal is not awkward and ugly. Ugh. Insulting a flag just because you don't like it is all well enough but for goodness sake that flag has served us well, and has not been besmirched in such a way that necessitates change.
My apologies then.Lord Ravenclaw:The first part was aimed at Syrixia.
Lord Ravenclaw:Of all the things I have heard to refer to TNP, 17th Century France, is not one of them.
This. We need to modernize! It'll look so much better. Just ask Tsunamy. The old TSP seal was similar to TNP's seal until they changed it. It looks so much better and sleeker now. You can't deny that.Piscivore:That's kind of rude.Lord Ravenclaw:You will just ignore everyone who disagrees with you (as per normal), so I shall not waste my time debating with you.
Good luck getting enough support to get this to pass the RA. Chapter 8 of the LC.
--
That seal is not awkward and ugly. Ugh. Insulting a flag just because you don't like it is all well enough but for goodness sake that flag has served us well, and has not been besmirched in such a way that necessitates change.
It's not awkward and ugly? what are all those little dangly balls everywhere? Are they meant to be sword hilts> Compass points? Anchors? it's a mess. And the whole thing is redolent of 17th century France. Are we in the Palace of Versailles? I don't think so...
Chapter 8 of the LC can be easily amended. I could even make a new flag with the new seal on it using a nice new design if needed.Lord Ravenclaw:The first part was aimed at Syrixia.
Of all the things I have heard to refer to TNP, 17th Century France, is not one of them.
This ^Nierr:This isn't TSP. This isn't TEP. And whilst both regions are valued partners, just because they do something, doesn't mean we should.
As it stands, I see no better alternative to the currently seal, and no amount of 'but they did this' or 'we need to modernise because reasons' is changing that from what I see.
Piscivore:I've been thinking for some time that the seal we have for TNP is overly complex and old-fashioned. I knocked these together as a proposal, to get a conversation started:
What century is this?plembobria:It's a coat of arms.
Unlike seals, coats of arms have never been modernized and should remain unmodernized so they retain their value, the value that they were intended to convey.Piscivore:What century is this?plembobria:It's a coat of arms.
The century where every town, city, region and country have their own coat of arms?Piscivore:What century is this?plembobria:It's a coat of arms.
Not where I'm from. Neither my state nor my town has one.Nierr:The century where every town, city, region and country have their own coat of arms?Piscivore:What century is this?plembobria:It's a coat of arms.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seals_of_the_U.S._states <-- no? Your state *is* there.Piscivore:Not where I'm from. Neither my state nor my town has one.Nierr:The century where every town, city, region and country have their own coat of arms?Piscivore:What century is this?plembobria:It's a coat of arms.
Why do we care why they did what they did?Syrixia:Then why did they modernize? It doesn't appear they had a reason either.
. . . without the feudal/monarchal undertones or the irrational emotional investment.Nierr:Your state has a seal, which as a symbol of government authority dates back to Ancient Egypt and even further to Mesopotamia.
It is almost entirely the same thing as a coat of arms.
No.Former English Colony:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seals_of_the_U.S._states <-- no? Your state *is* there.Piscivore:Not where I'm from. Neither my state nor my town has one.Nierr:The century where every town, city, region and country have their own coat of arms?Piscivore:What century is this?plembobria:It's a coat of arms.
Good thing TNP is a monarchy, huh?Piscivore:. . . without the feudal/monarchal undertones or the irrational emotional investment.
Good lord.SillyString:Good thing TNP is a monarchy, huh?Piscivore:. . . without the feudal/monarchal undertones or the irrational emotional investment.