Thank you, ambassador from Egalotir, for the question.
I believe that the procedure for membership should remain the same. The Chairman should reserve the right to reject any application, however, such a rejection must be put to vote to the whole body for a period of 5 days immediately, in order for it to be upheld. Furthermore, the Deputy Chairman should be charged with keeping and maintaining a publicly accessible Google Sheet listing membership. Each week, the Deputy Chairman should check the Civil Rights Ratings and Political Freedoms Ratings provided by the World Assembly to check if members have attained the membership minimum of 40 for both. If for 8 weeks straight, the members have not been able to attain such a level, membership is automatically revoked.
In my opinion, debate procedure should be made simple. The Chairman will open a thread on an issue that the Chairman finds important, and this thread will allow for informal debate on the issue, with the end goal of bringing about a proposal for a treaty to be ratified by all DU members.
Members of the DU can submit proposals to the Chairman for vote. To be ratified as a treaty of the Democratic Union upheld by ALL members, at least 90% of the body must voice their agreement with the proposal on the thread that the Chairman posts on the proposal. Debate can be held for amendments to be made to said proposal: in order for such an amendment to succeed, two members other than the proposer of the amendment should endorse said amendment. The end result of this is that the DU seeks to encourage the politics of consensus.
All these, along with a preamble stating the vision of the Democratic Union, will be part of the Constitution that will, in all likelihood, be the very first proposal put to vote
-Kristen Marinos