Flemingovia For Vice-Delegate

And why do you think I would not accomplish much? I think, as far as dealing with removing invaders from the region (Gates, to be specific, which I recall you said could not be done by my methods) I have proved that I can accomplish a lot if given the chance or permitted to take the chance.


And how would you feel if I voted for you specifically because a Flemingovia Vice Delegacy would promote some very delightful, yet destructive chaos?
 
Romanoffia:
And why do you think I would not accomplish much? I think, as far as dealing with removing invaders from the region (Gates, to be specific, which I recall you said could not be done by my methods) I have proved that I can accomplish a lot if given the chance or permitted to take the chance.


And how would you feel if I voted for you specifically because a Flemingovia Vice Delegacy would promote some very delightful, yet destructive chaos?
As far as I remember this is the third (fourth?) time you have brought this up in this election. In fact, every time your ability to deliver is questioned you mention this one incident that happened years ago. This suggests that your c.v. Is a little on the light side.

On the issue of voting for me, I will take votes for any reason, founded or not. However, I do not feel a vote for me would be destructive in any way, shape or form.
 
flemingovia:
Romanoffia:
And why do you think I would not accomplish much? I think, as far as dealing with removing invaders from the region (Gates, to be specific, which I recall you said could not be done by my methods) I have proved that I can accomplish a lot if given the chance or permitted to take the chance.


And how would you feel if I voted for you specifically because a Flemingovia Vice Delegacy would promote some very delightful, yet destructive chaos?
As far as I remember this is the third (fourth?) time you have brought this up in this election. In fact, every time your ability to deliver is questioned you mention this one incident that happened years ago. This suggests that your c.v. Is a little on the light side.

On the issue of voting for me, I will take votes for any reason, founded or not. However, I do not feel a vote for me would be destructive in any way, shape or form.
Well, cheeky chappy, at least I actually do something. In fact, there are a lot of other accomplishments involving the NPIA from way-back-when too. More that you will ever know. I could tell you about them but then I'd have to...never mind. :fish:

The problem here is that you are unwittingly propagating the very things that you gripe against.

Just a bit of campaign advise which is the result of watching elections for years in TNP: the sure way to NOT get elected to any office is to promise change, and that is especially true if one intends to change things.

What you need to do is to simply run on a platform that says, "I am going to do exactly the very same things that everyone else has done before; I will give it all a shiny new coat of paint, change the taxonomy and call it 'change' in such a way that everyone knows is not change at all. I have grandiose schemes for expanding government, land in Florida and a bridge in Brooklyn to offer too!"

Now that (and a sufficient quantity of baby-kidding in the form of overt posterior osculation will get a candidate elected every single time. The more suction applied, the greater the chances.

Unfortunately, some people in TNP are not of sufficient temperament to be well suited to osculating posteriors and therefore, no change will occur when such persons are not elected to office.

You are like Howard Roark from Ayn Rand's book "The Fountainhead". In fact, there are several of us who are like this character. I now exactly how you feel. I suggest you watch this short scene from the movie "The Fountainhead" and you will utterly understand where I am coming from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRXcaWVr_uI.

Unfortunately, no one truly values the individual nor the efforts of the individual.
 
Back
Top