I resigned my UN because I needed it available for another project. Madjack had more than enough UNs to regain the delegacy, and NK had made his intention to leave quite clear. I had no reason to put my UN there. You'll notice, if you consider all the circumstantial evidence, not just the stuff that's convenient to recalling me, that I unendorsed NK as soon as the order to do so was given earlier in the day, and had been endorsing madjack since that nation joined the UN. I only removed my endo of madjack when ordered, legally, by the government of Osiris. And Madjack wasn't even in the region, to endorse, at the time I resigned. Operating on the (reasonable, at the time) assumption that he would move on time, my presence should not have been necessary. Please show me the logic whereby failure to do something which I was under no legal duty to do, and which was mechanically impossible, constitutes evidence of guilt. Please, show me.
As far as the NPA endorsing only madjack, that's fine, I may be mistaken. I am positive that the UDL did endorse NK, and that the legally elected and legally acting government of Osiris ordered all Osiran citizens, and everyone present in #osiris at the time of the incident, to endorse NK. I did that. Then NK couped, made his intentions clear, and madjack was unbanned. I did not have a UN in the region at the time madjack was there; failure to do something I mechanically incapable of doing falls far short of establishing a reasonable suspicion of guilt, or even a preponderence. Madjack wasn't in the region. I didn't want my WA there anymore, and I was under no orders at that point to endorse anyone else (that I was aware of). I dropped my WA, removing my endorsement of NK.
To tl;dr all of that: I followed orders I was given as an Osiran citizen. Then I dropped my WA. I was under, and remain under, no legal requirement either here or there to retain a WA nation, nor to keep it there, as at that time (as far as I am aware) no surrogate had been selected, and neither madjack nor quad were in the region. So again, if you want to take the broadly circumstantial evidence of me resigning my WA when I had noone I was ordered to endorse, as evidence of my complicity with this conspiracy, well, go right ahead. The "evidence" laid before me would get laughed out of court if you tried to file an indictment on that basis; why should a recall be any different?