The Election Commission didn't feel it necessary since the posted votes are transparent and the single private vote would not have effected the overall tallies.
it's always been done in the past, and I don't see why it had to be changed this time
I have a box of tissues in my office for you and anyone else that wishes to continue whining on a subject that has already been addressed.
Um, civility please?
That was civil. If I wished to be uncivil, as many here can attest to my being on occasion in the past, I would have commented at some length on the overly pedantic antics of some in regards to minutiae of everyday commonality in this region.
The only vote that was even potentially in contention was the Delegate vote, which held a vote of 16-5, hardly a neck and neck affair, and these numbers were expressed clearly in the thread specific for that election.
The rest of the ballot was either completely uncontested or won by such a large margin that expressed explanation should not have been necessarily for anyone that bothered to take even a cursory glance at the voting thread.
Romanoffia garnered one vote in the only contested election outside the Delegacy, which has already been addressed. One vote. There were 25 votes cast publicly. Even if the remaining 14 members of the Regional Assembly had bothered to vote privately, instead of that number being one, and they had all voted for Romanoffia the end result would have been the same.
Likewise, the CLO only needed to be elected via plurality and since their were only three candidates running for three positions and since the Court has ruled that abstentions are not equivalent to Nays in a vote or election even a single vote for each of the candidates assured them of their spot provided that at least one vote for each was placed on a ballot.
Therefore, through any reasonably logical appraisal there should have been no question whatsoever of the validity of the statement made in the opening post of this thread and no reason whatsoever for a full disclosure of the final tally outside that of polite information, which I indeed did provide after the first inquiry. I fail to see the need for repeated conversation or comment on the issue.
)
