GV has released a position on the WA. Rom, you obviously don't know what you are talking about.
I'll post it when I get the chance.
Please do post it. Inquiring minds want to know.
The whole current purpose of Gatesville as resisting the UN is over. Controlling the WA is another issue, and I suspect that if Gates pursues a more logical, reasonably and non-coercive program to control the WA and any tendencies it will develop to restrict national and regional sovereignty I suspect that Gates will find a lot more friends than enemies.
Again, let me reiterate my personal position on the matter of the deceased UN and the new WA - I agree with Gates in principle but not methodology. I agree with the anti-world government stance, but not by use of coercion, which, ironically, is a form of world government more totalitarian than the UN ever was.
We have a chance here to promote and implement something that promotes sovereignty against tyranny by a one-world socialistic arrangement. Let's all take the cooperative advantage of it while we can instead of inflicting the same old garbage or who controls the whole world that we have been laboring under for so long.
Gates has no reason to continue supporting L&C (not that it matters in the long or short term) given that the UN is gone. I suspect that Gates will take this opportunity to shift his paradigm towards the use of persuasion instead of coercion in promoting what is otherwise a very logical and reasonable agenda as per national and regional sovereignty without having to obtain leave of a world-government.
Oh, and I know exactly what I am talking about.
R