Namyeknom
TNPer
As far as I was concerned back in my brief stop over as MoEA, embassy treaties could be signed by the MoEA without approval of the RA. Any agreement or treaty that require a military relationship was required to have a cabinet vote (so I'm assuming the Lion Star Pact is heading that way if re-signed). And full blown alliances would require the RA's approval. At least that was the intended point of the new MoEA legislation we put through a couple of months back.
Actually, having looked at the constitution and the amendment that was voted through involving this, I notice the constitution hasn't been updated with these new changes.
RA Vote on Article 2 Section 4
Unless there was some reason why this amendment hasn't been made?
Not having read the convention articles I don't know the level of commitment required, but I'm reasonbly sure TNP Law 9 Article 5 inferes the same distinctions apply to agreements with multi-regional organisation as to those with individual regions(ie. if were forced to offer military support in some way it would count as an alliance, and therefore require RA approval).
Or at least thats how I read it.
Edit - Sorry about the gate crashing Flem, didn't read the thread title before posting.
Actually, having looked at the constitution and the amendment that was voted through involving this, I notice the constitution hasn't been updated with these new changes.
RA Vote on Article 2 Section 4
Unless there was some reason why this amendment hasn't been made?
Not having read the convention articles I don't know the level of commitment required, but I'm reasonbly sure TNP Law 9 Article 5 inferes the same distinctions apply to agreements with multi-regional organisation as to those with individual regions(ie. if were forced to offer military support in some way it would count as an alliance, and therefore require RA approval).
Or at least thats how I read it.
Edit - Sorry about the gate crashing Flem, didn't read the thread title before posting.