Tangents!

Sarcodina:
Has anyone had a good sandwich of high quality?

I was wondering of the perfect contents of a well perfect sandwich.
Click to expand...
Broodwich.jpg


Recognize the greatest (and most evil) sandwich ever!

List of ingredients


The Voice: It is the Broodwich. Forged in darkness from wheat harvested in hell's half acre. Baked by Beelzebub. Slathered with mayonnaise beaten from the evil eggs of dark chicken force-fed to dogs by the hands of a one eyed mad man. Cheese boiled from the rancid teat of fanged cow. Layered with 666 separate meats from an animal, which has maggots for blood.
Frylock: See, told ya.
Shake: I tasted mustard.
The Voice: Yeah... Dijon mustard.
Shake: Well... how come no bacon?
The Voice: Bacon is extra.
Click to expand...
 
Now it's saying it has soup recipes, but the stuff in the bowl looks like vomit.

That reminds me of Magicality's "Soup or Puke?" thread on the Ol' Blue.
 
I read an article earlier today about an Alaskan oil field that had to be shut down. Now the US has lost 8% of its oil production capacity. Damn, now it is time to get hit at the pump. There goes my 2.87 a gallon gas. :(
 
Oooo... And American Indians, too!

Really! No joke. In fact, it's an insult to their race that we have Andrew Jackson on our twenty dollar bill.
 
Sarcodina:
We totally subjugated Hawaiians?
Click to expand...
Yes. Yes we did. I am very certain that the Hawaiians were not happy when we decided to annex their kingdom. They're still pretty upset about it. They're pretty racist to white people. And now Hawaii has a huge asian population and most of them are racist also. It's a pretty racist state.

OPA: First off, thanks for using "American Indian" I find it a lot more palatable than "Native Americans" which is a huge misnomer. Secondly, yeah, Jackson was no friend to American Indians, or pretty much anyone. I think he was one of the worst Presidents ever. I think that maybe Harding gets that honor.
 
I am well aware of Jackson and Amerindians (my favorite term), but I forgot about any treatment towards Hawaiians specifically. Phillipines, yes. Other places in the sea, yes. Not Hawaii.

I sort of think that in the end who started a movement really has a great effect on it. For example, our Founding Fathers were great men, not perfect men, and our country is thus great not perfect. Abraham Lincoln was a great man, still a flawed and oddly shaped man with many unpopular ideas (ie civil war), so the Republican party is great still flawed and filled with quite a lot of ugly people (not of course yours truly). Andrew Jackson was a populist and a racist who had ideas that the people loved. The Democratic Party is a populist party that has ideas that sound great, and it is the party of racism. Focusing first on persecuting minorities in public society, then making them feel inferior and in need of rich white people's assistance.
 
:2c: Wait, more Republicans supported the Civil Rights Act than Democrats, so that is a non-argument... And how did Clinton improve African Americans in America? Now, I mean them specifically not poor people, which one could obviously say welfare and jobs. Because I don't find it logical to compare AAs to poor folk, which is what many in the Democratic party appear to feel. The Democrats focus on race not on sane differences like education level and socio-economic qualfiiers. It is still a race issue. This is racism.

Would anyone agree to focus on Catholics and non-Catholics? How there are more Catholics dropping out of school then non-Catholics? No, maybe b/c many immigrants with low education and poor background are dropping out, skewing the numbers that happen to be Catholic.

Focusing on race and religion is bad.
 
I wonder when the Democratic Party switched from the pro-segregationist, pro-states rights party of the pre-Civil War to civil rights movement days to the "hippy, treehugging pacifist" party of today. :P
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top