Search results

I probably would have waited until max responses. I like to be last. I would have voted A.

The 12-hour-long challenge period has now passed, and the Election Commission is now ready to vote on whether or not to certify the May 2026 Judicial Election Results as given to them by the Election Supervisors, per Section 4, Clause 10 of the Election Commission Rules: The vote will have two...

4/4 approve. The Election Commission appoints Isenoka (@tobagotomatoes) as Temporary Election Commissioner.

We're down to 4 commissioners with LD and Pallaith in the judicial as candidates. Ruben was previously looking for new commissioners and mentioned Isenoka (@tobagotomatoes) had interest, as well as Cretox. I reached out to Isenoka. Are we good with them as the temp?

Looks to be a simple mistake. There are 61 valid ballots on the spreadsheet. I've corrected the error.

A

@Arty and I will supervise the May 2026 Judicial Election

Done, but not for the reason you think. I'll reach out later, at my own convenience.

You do know nominations don't really mean anything by themselves, right? Accepting a nomination is functionally the same as declaring candidacy. Declining a nomination is just a way to tell everyone you're not interested in the spot. "Withdrawing", "striking out", or seconding a nomination is...

With @Cloud's resignation as Speaker, a special election is needed. @Lord Dominator and I will supervise the April 2026 Special Speaker Election.

Sued for not being a citizen.

@Eluvatar Help, please!

Yeah, good question. Not sure what happened. But, check your signature now and see if it's what you're expecting it to look like. I made some edits.

If you do manage to get two others to join you, I'll have to resort to an R4R to get the law implemented as I intended. Shall we have a little fun with this? (Khan, in a menacing tone: "Shall we begin?")

Done

You're right, and I apologize. I thought I was doing that in a joking manner, but obviously that is impossible to convey over text.

GFY, Mall. The Speaker, as the proposer of the bill, should immediately motion this to vote, shorten formal debate, and shorten the voting period. It's what I would have done. Granted, none of this would have happened if the Speaker's Office would have taken the actual content of the bill and...

Not really an admin issue. The Vice Delegate could have taken care of it. But, since I can, I did.

You're impacted by a Xenforo technical limitation. Either we give the Court Examiner their own subforum, or you ask a Justice to edit the thread for you. Or, if the Court is okay with you having pseudo-moderator permissions to the Court subforum like they have, that would also be a solution.

And now that the ruling has been posted, I can present my Root Cause Analysis for this issue and why it was even brought up in the first place. I originally thought I had no ability to do so, but it turns out that was false. To be clear, my RCA was performed after briefs had closed. The reason...

You should have access to the Special Court Chambers as a THO, and any discussion thread should be moved there. You should be able to do the work there.

https://www.nationstates.net/nation=sein https://www.nationstates.net/nation=the_legionarian_isles banned for sexual harassment and bigotry in violation of NS rules.

Done. There's no outward facing display that you are court examiner, but there should be some difference in what you can access.

I think this is done. Let me know if you spot anything not right.

@Picairn passes the admin check @variable fails the admin check (educational IP) @Djenter fails the admin check (mobile IP) @Alpanna passes the admin check @ExquisiteGentleman passes the admin check

Only Eluvatar can do that himself.

Speaker @Cloud, the five days for formal debate have elapsed and a vote has not yet been scheduled. Could you please do so?

The following pass the Admin Check: @Asgård (automatically, timed out) @Booyah @Owenstacey @Call_me_EnvY @Ambis @Cauloria

This

All done.