Search results

  1. AlHoma

    The North Pacific vs. Fulhead Land

    I thank the court and the defense for having patience with me during a period of personal issues. As the author clearly claims that they are the controler of the nation was also in controll of the nation excersizing controll of "The Lexicon" it is understood that the author choose to discard...
  2. AlHoma

    The North Pacific vs. Fulhead Land

    The prosecution wishes to note that they asked a direct question of the presiding officer of the court and as such are waiting for the response.
  3. AlHoma

    Unavailibility

    I am moving and as such will be on a temporary leave of absence for one week. I authorize my deputy to vote in cabinet matter decisions in the finest tradition of the ministry. I authorize my deputy to take command of all affairs of the Ministry of Justice with the exception of the "TNP vs...
  4. AlHoma

    Cabinet Vote

    Aye
  5. AlHoma

    Cabinet Vote

    Aye
  6. AlHoma

    The North Pacific vs. Fulhead Land

    The prosecution has no further questions for this witness. I would like to thank my coluge, the defense council for coming strait to the matter at hand. Prosecution exhibit B is prime evidence due to the fact that on several occasions the policy of Duality has been discarded by the defendant...
  7. AlHoma

    The North Pacific vs. Fulhead Land

    Your honor I do object to the defense badgering and barating the witness in particular While the first statement may be true, the second is most definiteley not. As the line of questioning by the defense is seeking to dismantle further testimony of the states case by tackling a prime issue in...
  8. AlHoma

    Lexicon (again)

    We're still at war with them? :blink: :blink: :blink: :blink: :blink: :blink:
  9. AlHoma

    The North Pacific vs. Fulhead Land

    The prosecution has no further questions for the witness at this time.
  10. AlHoma

    Initial buy ins

    You might find an answer Here ;)
  11. AlHoma

    The North Pacific vs. Fulhead Land

    At this time I would like to introduce Prosecution Exhibit B. The following was taken from the Lexicon forum: QUOTE (July 10 2006 9:42 PM) This post was made by the account "Fulhead Land". I ask that the court and jury note that the same account name is used and righfully claimed as the...
  12. AlHoma

    Elections approaching

    I'm ineligible and will gladly take up the position of Election Nanny
  13. AlHoma

    Pacific Purge

    Ivan fondles the ban button firmly Insane Power declares he's quitting (but secretly holds the controls still) Unrelated, I think NOT!
  14. AlHoma

    The North Pacific vs. Fulhead Land

    Thank you Mister Defense Attorney. So, Hersfold, I am to understand that the defendant has come close, in your opinion, to violating the terms of his oath to the region? In addition, the defendant, after the events of the summer of 2005 has not proactiveley contributed to the governance of...
  15. AlHoma

    The North Pacific vs. Fulhead Land

    Hersfold: Please explain your history and contact with the defendant prior to the the declaration of war by The Lexicon
  16. AlHoma

    The North Pacific vs. Fulhead Land

    Your honor, as the legal representative of the state and bodies thereof in these proceedings, I object to the defense's opening statement specifically The person in question was acting in their role as Director of the NPIA to clarify the disposition of the articles of evidence. In addition...
  17. AlHoma

    The North Pacific vs. Fulhead Land

    Ladies and gentelmen of the jury, at this time the prosecution calls the head of the NPIA, Hersfold, to the stand.
  18. AlHoma

    The North Pacific vs. Fulhead Land

    The prosecution has filed its evidence and encourages the defense to make their opening statement
  19. AlHoma

    The North Pacific vs. Fulhead Land

    The Prosecution submits that the previously filed evidence with the defense and court was the item of concern.
  20. AlHoma

    The North Pacific vs. Fulhead Land

    Mr Justice, I move to close the court to non-related persons as evidence that I shal present is obtained through regional security methods. Ladies and Gentelmen of the jury, During the period of open hostility from the Lexicon towards the soverign region of The North Pacific, the accused did...
  21. AlHoma

    NS Down

    Just logged in with my 2 puppets (it was time to revitalize) No problem.
  22. AlHoma

    Lexicon...

    As a victim of this program I'd like to say that there is only going to be so many times that the leadership of the Lexicon (i.e. IP and Cathyy) can sh*t on the entire region and expect to get away with it.
  23. AlHoma

    The North Pacific vs. Fulhead Land

    The prosecution raises no objections
  24. AlHoma

    FD - Judicial Changes

    I hate to throw a wrench into the works, but (currently) the AG is also the MoJ
  25. AlHoma

    Grumble grumble

    I would personally go and <<CENSORED DUE TO MANY MANY TOS VIOLATIONS>> but I'm currently applying for membership in a alliance and I'm up in the 5k nation rank
  26. AlHoma

    The North Pacific vs. Fulhead Land

    The prosecution raises no objection to said list of jurrors
  27. AlHoma

    Am I totally out of line?

    I feel like I'm fighting a doubly uphill battle with the prosecution of the case of Fulhead Land. I follow the rules, quietly attempt to get the defense to obey the rules, file objections in the court, try to get the chief justice to step in when the justice in the case seems more interested in...
  28. AlHoma

    The North Pacific vs. Fulhead Land

    Your Honor, Subsection B of the law is quite clear on this matter Therefore I request that the defense be ordered to abide by the rules of the court.
  29. AlHoma

    The North Pacific vs. Fulhead Land

    Your Honor, I request that the defense council be required to respect the order of the court. Specifically in the "The North Pacific vs. Fulhead Land Discussion Thread" both the defendant and defense attorney have posted violating the gag order.
  30. AlHoma

    Term Limits, again...

    While I understand the 1 of every 2 terms (2 terms max / 4 terms per year) idea quite well I have an issue of the same people being put up for candidacy in a style of passing the power back and forth. I'd much rather a 2 out of every 3 terms. It would ensure that at least 1 election will have...
Back
Top