Search results

I did not wish to see the Pacific embroiled or implicated in a coup, or attempted coup, of a fellow GCR and therefore reported it to the body I believed responsible for dealing with this sort of situation. The term 'interesting' can have both positive and negative connotation. I am not...

Since the purpose of this deposition is to validate the evidence I provided, there is an implicit question regarding said evidence outstanding from the outset. I have therefore provided it. Further, since it appears this deposition will not conclude prior to the Court's deadline, I have...

Since this is an odd deposition, which may or may not be accepted by the Court because of the defense counsel's claims regarding the prosecutions time to gather evidence, I will simply affirm the validity of the telegrams and messages that I provided to the Security Council and the Attorney...

I swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

Then perhaps you should adjust the Court Rules to match reality? How are foreign visitors meant to wade through your legal system if your laws do not match your practice? While depositions here may involve both sides asking questions, the rules clearly do not support that conclusion as they...

Again, I have stated that I will adhere to the Presiding Justice's decision regarding the deposition. I am not surprised that the Court can not follow its own rules considering the lack of reading comprehension skills apparent in those they let serve as defense attorneys. Et si omnes ego non.

I sought clarification because the Adopted Court Rules do not appear to be being followed. I am not a defence witness as I have not been contacted by the defence as such. As I noted earlier, I was contacted by the prosecution to give verification of the evidence. As of this moment, that is...

I do what I can.

That said, I will let the matter rest and follow whatever guidelines the Presiding Justice is suggesting. I am just pointing out that having a set of rules in place and then not following them seems a bit odd. Especially when it seems at least one party has made assumptions about my role in...

Yes, that is commonly understood. But, it does not address my questions regarding the rules. If I provide the Court with a witness statement then the defense can request a deposition. If I provide prosecution with an evidence verification deposition then the defense can not ask me questions...

I will, of course, concede to the word of the Presiding Justice, but I wanted to clarify a few points, especially as Eluvatar indicates something is being misread. The Adopted Court Rules do not include any questioning of a witness outside of evidence-related issues. Section 2: Criminal Trial...

I, again, simply point to the Adopted Court Rules. As I would not want to infringe on TNP's legal system as an outsider, I can do nothing but adhere to the rules you have provided for me.

However you wish to do it. I was just assuming we would follow your Court Rules. Imagine that. Also, as I am available this weekend, would it not be prudent to run the deposition via a forum thread as allowed under the Court Rules? Generally, things like individual IRC schedules should not...

Apologies to the Court, but a few points of clarification regarding the status of at least one witness. Feel free to move this to the appropriate location if the trial thread is not it. I was approached by the Deputy Attorney General via Telegram on or about the 8th of October in order to...

Apologies for my late arrival, I was otherwise occupied for the majority of this week. I will be in touch with both the Attorney General's Office and Defense Counsel tomorrow to discuss a suitable time for my deposition.

From the Government of the Pacific Greetings, the North Pacific. The government of the Pacific, in the name of the Emperor of the Pacific Order, greets you all, and officially ask you to recognize Pergamon as the ambassador between our two regions. This nation shall be our communications...

Tir-Na-Nog-Ta has been relieved of duty and is no longer ambassador to TNP from the Pacific. We will arrange a new ambassador (hopefully a more active one) within the coming days. Thank you.

Thank you. Our Ambassador should take residence shortly.

The NPA issue was addressed over a month ago, I fail to see a logical reason for bringing it up again. Has something else occurred that I should be aware of?

I believe you will find that you are quite mistaken regarding my diplomatic skills. You may not appreciate my tone but I am actually quite effective. I just don't put a lot of concern in how people that follow me around NationStates with a chip on their shoulder feel about me. ;)

Sigh No one (from The Pacific) is whining. It is generally considered common courtesy, even among enemies, that when a Foreign Dignitary asks for an update over something that has taken literally months that he not be ignored outright. That is what happened here. My response was directly...

You are mistaken. I levied no insult to you. I pointed out a fact. As far as I am aware you are Delete on Sight from the game NationStates. Has this fact changed? If so, I apologize. If not, then no insult was made. You can choose to take it as you like. You have no business here (unless...

I must have hit a nerve. I guess OOC attacks are all you have available to you since you don't actually play NationStates and yet feel the need to take part in an offsite forum dedicated to people playing NationStates. I do quite well in life, thanks for caring.

Indeed. It has been 'under discussion' for nearly three full months. It was initially stated that a delay was due to the shift in Delegacy here. There was then some private communication between myself and the government here regarding certain historical issues, which have been delayed until...

Do you speak for the government of TNP? Just curious. It would seem that my remarks at least get a reply.

It would appear that not only can this region not come to a conclusion regarding this application, but it can not be bothered to address queries from those making it. How nice.

Indeed. It would appear, upon further inspection of the thread, that I missed this post from your office. My apologies for the confusion. Taking that into consideration, I withdraw my initial complaint.

I have no concerns regarding the legality of the action within the North. I am well aware of several members of your armed forces that actively oppose the New Pacific Order. I simply came to request clarification since, until today, there had been no communication from your Ministry of Foreign...

I do understand, and I appreciate you taking the time to answer the question. This is, unfortunately in my opinion, the first we have heard that it is even being discussed. That said, if a member of the Revolutionary Guard entered a region with seemingly ill-intent without authorization, I can...

The impression stems from a lack of official response in this thread aside from a few Deputy Ministers from areas unrelated to Foreign Affairs. It also stems from the fact that I have made several requests to the Delegate directly regarding a means of addressing specific past wrongs committed...