Search results

Oh no. Well, we still got permission. Next time, I'll ask the proper authorities to handle this matter.

Nononono I'm not advocating war. I'll need to rewrite this thing...

Well, we just got permission from the founder... We need to establish some comprehensive, effective criteria for territorial expansion, especially for incorporating existing regions and such...

Same, I motion too.

I put "establish as a territory", but "incorporate" would work abstractly.

As I explained above, I was saying "annex" in terms of making The Wellspring a territory of TNP. Not in the way you described it, but with respect to the procedures the Legal Code has. Guess I should alter the language of the proposal. Y'know, so we're not "annexing" the region.

I was thinking that would be what "annexation" would mean in this context. By 'annex', I meant the designation of a region as a territory of The North Pacific.

The issue has been fixed; it is no longer included in the draft.

Perhaps it could be in the regulation, health/bioethics, and environmental categories? Moral decency seems undesirable, and either of the 3 aforementioned categories would be favorable in my opinion. Also, those poor chicks. I tear at the fact these fluffy, adorable creatures are liquidated at...

Under Clause 66, Section 7.9 of the North Pacific Legal Code, I propose the following legislation to the Regional Assembly: I propose this due to the fact The Wellspring is a fruit of the "engineered [...] halving of [our] populations" with the Frontiers update. Not only would this (1) expand...

Regression bad. Progression good. Me like liberal.

Seems like we need a legality challenge.

Okay. How long should I wait? (Sorry, I'm kinda new to the whole legislative process.)

Oh. What do you recommend fixing this?

Seeing how the comments on this proposal have ceased, I hereby motion for a vote.

Mod: Sorry, but this thread is only for nations on the Eras RP map. Also, we don't accept NationStates statistics in RP. You're welcome to join the map if you'd like, but you will need to come up with something a little more realistic. More info here...

...And there we go! Helpful?

Should I add that the Acting Speaker becomes so upon a vacancy or absenteeism?

Alright, I just updated the proposal to reflect everyone's requests. I believe it will be much better now.

Okay! I gotcha! Task: Reword "wtf [you] just said" into a legally effective, comprehensive statement.

Oh. How do you recommend improving it?

Yeah, allow me to explain: The current writing in the law (at least to me) is kind of word salad. This is rewriting it so it can be comprehended by all readers.

Removing the legislative limit would allow for more votes to take place, hence allowing more bills to be processed. As for the most recent Deputy Speaker, I guess it would be best to ensure any can act as Speaker, since the most recent one would be the only one technically. I feel limiting the...

I have reviewed the Regional Assembly Rules, and I see the need for reform and disambiguation within the language and impacts of the document. If there are any concerns, state your case or DM me later in the forums about it. Removing the voting limit would allow for more bills to be processed...

That's a good idea; thanks for your input. However, how would one recruit members for the team of historians? I guess a Google Form or something like that, and I'd get the word out via adverts and threads.

Alight, my database collectors! Here's the gameplan for our regional historical office: Gather data on former officials, parties, legacies, tenures, etc. Compile aforementioned data into a comprehensive database. @Hulldom (or the Delegate in general) will instate a new office for the North...

That will help a lot! We need all the data we can get before we database it!

Can you find that? We're getting to a head start on collecting data now! If we're gonna establish this historical office, we need all the data we can get!

Yeah. It's not what you said that's the issue; how was the culture office even created? It does not appear in the Legal Code, so maybe it was formulated by other means? Could some legislative historians come be of assistance?

suspicious astronaut suits