Recent content by Lord Dominator

That makes an absolute majority at least, results will be posted promptly

A

The 12-hour-long challenge period has now passed, and the Election Commission is now ready to vote on whether or not to certify the March 2026 General Election Results as given to them by the Election Supervisors, per Section 4, Clause 10 of the Election Commission Rules: The vote will have...

The allies/enemies list was just moved to the diplomacy section, I assume so we don’t have it twice and can just point to one spot

65% seems reasonable The % is always adjustable (amend the law again), the idea of using the % is that we can hopefully keep the same basic level as a % no matter the absolute level, and thus not need to adjust this again if population crashes or spikes

Aye

I, Lord Dominator, do hereby solemnly swear that during my term as Deputy Minister of Military Affairs, I will uphold the ideals of Democracy, Freedom, and Justice of The Region of The North Pacific. I will use the powers and rights granted to me through The North Pacific Constitution and Legal...

Against

Personally I tend to think the fact that thus far literally no other applicant has even attempted to use the exception to my knowledge indicates that it doesn’t especially need to be an option. That admin check failure at this point only includes proxying and multiple accounts furthers this, as...

I, Lord Dominator, do hereby solemnly swear that during my term as Election Commissioner, I will uphold the ideals of Democracy, Freedom, and Justice of The Region of The North Pacific. I will use the powers and rights granted to me through The North Pacific Constitution and Legal Code in a...

I will 100% say that I just forgot that it was like that, so the % part of my suggestion can probably be ignored

I would generally agree with Gorundu, a floating requirement tied to a position would seem to resolve the problem of both declines like this bill seeks to solve and any potential increases (both short and long term). I would note that it would make sense to tie both, but each separately &...

It’s an entirely fair thing to pose to me specifically and the same reason why I am willing to say that I won’t seek EC again should I vacate (or not post an oath) office in the same manner as I have in the past - I do indeed have a history of it that others don’t.

That seems reasonable

Against while it lacks replacement (of either kind)