Recent content by Mall

Speaker: St George Would you like to reopen nominations? No

I would still consider having the "amendable" portion of the Legal Code excised. There is no reason why the government can't be responsible for maintaining a publicly viewable list of allies/enemies.

Please do not spam the thread. TAP has been proud to manage the campaign of St. George in the election for Speaker. A strong Speaker is critically important for TAP's legislative agenda to move forward.

I graciously decline my own self nomination, accept St George's nomination on their behalf, and decline Meteturan's nomination on their behalf.

Automatically enroll new citizens as trainees/cadets in the NPA. Give junior officers the role of mentoring them and finding out their interests. Officers can connect them with the appropriate ministries, answer questions, and they immediately have a roll to play in the region should they wish...

This is, perhaps, the most ambitious plan set forth by the Speaker's office in history.

I could make a detailed political point... or you could just ask Erastide (see: Durk).

I owe you that posting in another thread, and I'm sorry for the delay. This isn't the Regressive Party though - this is a sincere attempt to effect change without resorting to extralegal means. Says the fish to the shark.

Please do not sully this thread with silly questions.

The Constibillicode hasn't been modified to empower Halsoni to order such a thing, so no. I have high hopes that Halsoni will be the kind of Delegate that TAP looks for, but until the mechanisms of the region have been modified, TAP's mission must continue.

Raison d'être: The North Pacific is culturally dead, militarily irrelevant, politically neutered, and globally ignored. All of this can be changed by empowering the Delegate and defanging the snakes that weaken the region - the RA and the Courts. Mission Statement: The Authoritarian Party...

Thank you Lord Deputy Speaker. I ask that two other brave patriots of TNP voice their objection.

All good - in the context of the lambasting of the Speaker's handling of the vote I thought you were also mad at me :hug: Old age.

I don't think expressing my legislative preferences over a silly typo warrants me being told to go fuck myself. But to each their own. I not only will vote against, I also objected to the scheduling of the vote which the Speaker hasn't acknowledged. I object, again.