Search results

Did you stop calling it Constibillicode because of the royalties you have to pay me every time you use that term?

That's fine, I just responded to your post because you posted it :P

Clause 8 carves out the right of nations to institute reasonable restrictions in the interest of public health/safety. That's where nations would find safe harbor to close their borders or restrict travel in the event of an emergency.

You would prefer that a multination free-movement and free trade zone be organized without the involvement of the only extant international body of its kind? Why would you want that? The provisions that impact the rest of the WA are not burdensome - they save the legality of the proposal from...

Cheers, and kudos to you for being willing to rethink a position - a rare trait in the GA, but a very welcome one.

The definition is a 10/10 meme.

As discussed on discord, I'm going to argue with you over this because it sounds fun. And also because I'm actually on the right side of the argument - the hole you're referring to exists only in your imagination. Clause 2 gives WABC the right to process the applications, and Clause 8 is the...

The Defense requests that this Court open deposition threads for @Wonderess and @St George while reserving the right to submit additional requests as needed.

All users are reminded not to post in deposition threads unless under direction to do so from the relevant Court officials.

@Vivanco @Comfed Counsel are reminded that the time period to submit evidence is scheduled to close in roughly 2.5 hours.

Not a WA, but for. I don't care if Souls has been controversial, almost any condemnation nominee has been controversial at some point in their NS career (myself excluded).

The Court will review the above objections. We note, however, that until the evidence submission period closes, Counsel are permitted to amend, supplement, or otherwise modify their submissions. A deposition thread will be opened shortly.

@Vivanco @Comfed Counsel are reminded that the period to enter evidence will expire in 36 hours.

@Vivanco @Comfed In light of the above, the evidence submission period will commence immediately and expire on Sunday, September 13, at 11:59pm EDT, unless otherwise extended by the Court. Parties are advised the deposition threads will be made available on request.

A plea of "Not Guilty" has been entered on behalf of the Defendant. @Comfed is hereby appointed as counsel for the Defense. Consistent with the Court Rules and Procedures, Chapter 1 Section 2.3, the Court requests that the Prosecution and Defense set forth their proposed schedules and...

Noted. The 24 hour clock for the Defendant to enter a plea and obtain representation, should they desire, has commenced. Further details are below.

Thank you, Comfed. We will take your offer into consideration.

In the event that the Defendant in the above-referenced case does not elect to represent themself or name counsel, then the Court is obligated to appoint counsel pursuant to Section 2.3 of the Court Rules and Procedures. If you are interested in serving as Defense Counsel, please post below and...

Can confirm, would help if you couped.

I second the nomination of @saintpeter

I respectfully decline my self nomination for Speaker. I nominate Siwale for Vice Delegate.

Something about you screams "coup" but I can't put my finger on it. I'll vote for you.

The Court is now in session and will hear the case of The North Pacific v. Ihese as filed by Pigeonstan. Presiding over this case as Moderating Justice will be @Zyvetskistaahn (from 28 September 2020) @Mall (from 31 August 2020 to 28 September 2020) Representing The North Pacific as counsel...

Are we confident that the falsehood is what I identified above? That's the crux of it to me, we're assuming that Pigeonstan takes issue with that allegation.

I think the alleged falsehood is referenced in this paragraph: The allegation that Pigeonstan made certain reports for political reasons. That having been said, it's not clear. We could reject the indictment on those grounds - the indictment should allege facts sufficient to support a charge...

72.1% support amongst the 10KI proles and 100% amongst the leadership :P That's fair enough, although I *think* I still have a forum account. Grub told me I couldn't have one, so I made one anyways awhile back and no one seemed to mind...

I actually don't know anything about how 10KI decides its votes these days, it has been a long time since I last campaigned on your forum. You're right, "stomp" was an exaggeration. That having been said, the proposal having the unanimous support of 10KI certainly reinforces my entire point.

You have nothing to do with it, but you didn't hesitate to stomp in favor of the proposal, surprising no one. A proposal that repeats tired fash propaganda, gives German Dragons a shout out, and drones on about speculative accusations long since disclaimed by the regions allegedly harmed. You...

A weak repeal effort, lacking in style or substance. A disappointing, if unsurprising, attempt to rip a badge away from a raider player by 10KI.

I believe so!