Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Elon Musk has offered 1 Million USD for our domain. I could use the money for a cyber truck. So its a done deal, unless you can give me 1 million dollars by April 1, 2025 - Dreadton
Very well, once again.
Is Exhibit C an honest representation of the transcript you submitted to Rhindon Blade? (Obviously discounting the blocking out of your name and the arrow for emphasis.)
The defence opened this line of questioning by insinuating that there were no evidence evidence of sedition and treason, this is to merely show that while the witness may not have any further evidence, such evidence does indeed exist.
My question is about the actual discussion between the...
That was directed at you, one look at your recent comments to me will make it obvious. I thought quoting each and every one would add to an already torturously long thread. And maybe give you some dignity.
I do wonder how you'll twist this so you can call me an idiot again.
Though one can't...
Thank you.
Now looking back on Exhibit C...
Is this the evidence you submitted to Rhindon Blade? (Obviously discounting the blocking out of your name and the arrow for emphasis.)
And if so, I ask the following the questions to which a simple yes or no will suffice.
Does the accused freely...
This witness has already provided evidence in Exhibit C, which why the defendant is on trial. Why would the witness need to provide more and why is the Defence asking for this?
Relevance?
Also, is the Defence going to ask a question or are they just going to bloviate until his accusers die of...
It's up the Defence to find their own proof that absolves them, not to beg witnesses on the stand for a freebie.
I'd do a facepalm and wonder if you even know what you're doing, but it's been pretty obvious for a while now.
Objection, all of these questions relate to exhibit C. Asking the witness to provide more evidence is either irrelevant or at worst, insinuating that exhibit C is irrelevant.
The onus is own the defence to defend themselves against exhibit C, not for the witness to prove their own relevance.