Recent content by Pierconium

I did not wish to see the Pacific embroiled or implicated in a coup, or attempted coup, of a fellow GCR and therefore reported it to the body I believed responsible for dealing with this sort of situation. The term 'interesting' can have both positive and negative connotation. I am not...

Since the purpose of this deposition is to validate the evidence I provided, there is an implicit question regarding said evidence outstanding from the outset. I have therefore provided it. Further, since it appears this deposition will not conclude prior to the Court's deadline, I have...

Since this is an odd deposition, which may or may not be accepted by the Court because of the defense counsel's claims regarding the prosecutions time to gather evidence, I will simply affirm the validity of the telegrams and messages that I provided to the Security Council and the Attorney...

I swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

Then perhaps you should adjust the Court Rules to match reality? How are foreign visitors meant to wade through your legal system if your laws do not match your practice? While depositions here may involve both sides asking questions, the rules clearly do not support that conclusion as they...

Again, I have stated that I will adhere to the Presiding Justice's decision regarding the deposition. I am not surprised that the Court can not follow its own rules considering the lack of reading comprehension skills apparent in those they let serve as defense attorneys. Et si omnes ego non.

I sought clarification because the Adopted Court Rules do not appear to be being followed. I am not a defence witness as I have not been contacted by the defence as such. As I noted earlier, I was contacted by the prosecution to give verification of the evidence. As of this moment, that is...

I do what I can.

That said, I will let the matter rest and follow whatever guidelines the Presiding Justice is suggesting. I am just pointing out that having a set of rules in place and then not following them seems a bit odd. Especially when it seems at least one party has made assumptions about my role in...

Yes, that is commonly understood. But, it does not address my questions regarding the rules. If I provide the Court with a witness statement then the defense can request a deposition. If I provide prosecution with an evidence verification deposition then the defense can not ask me questions...

I will, of course, concede to the word of the Presiding Justice, but I wanted to clarify a few points, especially as Eluvatar indicates something is being misread. The Adopted Court Rules do not include any questioning of a witness outside of evidence-related issues. Section 2: Criminal Trial...

I, again, simply point to the Adopted Court Rules. As I would not want to infringe on TNP's legal system as an outsider, I can do nothing but adhere to the rules you have provided for me.

However you wish to do it. I was just assuming we would follow your Court Rules. Imagine that. Also, as I am available this weekend, would it not be prudent to run the deposition via a forum thread as allowed under the Court Rules? Generally, things like individual IRC schedules should not...

Apologies to the Court, but a few points of clarification regarding the status of at least one witness. Feel free to move this to the appropriate location if the trial thread is not it. I was approached by the Deputy Attorney General via Telegram on or about the 8th of October in order to...

Apologies for my late arrival, I was otherwise occupied for the majority of this week. I will be in touch with both the Attorney General's Office and Defense Counsel tomorrow to discuss a suitable time for my deposition.