Chipoli for Delegate - Strength in Stability

Chipoli

Delegate
-
-
-
Pronouns
he/him
TNP Nation
Chipoli
Discord
chipoli
7UT13Ak.jpeg

Chipoli for Delegate
Strength in Stability

Introduction

There has been no greater honor for me than serving as the Delegate of The North Pacific. The region has been my home for three years now, and in that time, I have forged a deep bond with its community and developed a passion for serving it. Eventually, I was entrusted with the region’s highest office, something I remain very grateful for. I rose through the ranks of the region, serving in nearly every aspect of our government to get where I am today, and I find myself at its pinnacle. The individuals who know me well are free to skip to the final paragraph, but I feel it is appropriate to give our newer voters an idea of who I am.

I love TNP. I have dedicated much of my time to improving the region and even more so as your Delegate. This is one of the greatest communities that I have been a part of, and I hope that I have proven that I am willing to fight tooth and nail for it. I’ve enjoyed being in the company of you all, and that’s a large part of why I am so passionate about the region and its people - if there’s anyone worth fighting for, it’s all of you.

My career of service is extensive. I have served twice as the Minister of World Assembly Affairs and played a key role in enforcing our WA policy. I am familiar with foreign policy as well, having served as the Minister of Foreign Affairs under two of my predecessors. Most notably, I assisted in the negotiations that helped us capture the Confederation of Corrupt Dictators and played a key role in the signing of the Augusta Borealis, our treaty with the Augustin Alliance. I also served as the region’s Acting Delegate, overseeing a rejuvenation in the executive following a period of inactivity and the signing of two treaties– the Aude Alliance with Carcassonne, and the Treaty of Northern Wells with The Wellspring. I have tackled our regional security as well, having served for a record-equalling three terms as Vice Delegate while getting the community engaged with the office with my weekly endorsement goals and card giveaways; I have also served on the regional Security Council for over a year. On a smaller note, I have served as a Deputy Speaker, Election Commissioner, Gameside Advocate, and a Deputy Minister in Foreign Affairs and World Assembly Affairs. Lastly, I have had the distinct pleasure of serving as your Delegate over the last four months. My accomplishments over this period will be covered later on this platform.

The slogan I chose for this campaign is “Strength in Stability”. In my eyes, stability is what this region needs. The Delegate’s seat has been passed around three times since the start of last year. Our region hasn’t had the chance to settle on the course of action it wants to take in the long term, and for our institutional issues to be fixed, that takes time. When I took my oath of office, I knew things wouldn’t change on a dime. I thought that we would be here for the long haul, trying to turn things around, and it looks like that is the case. The inactivity that has been around before I took office hasn’t gone away. It has built up over time throughout multiple administrations, and it will take more than a term to cure. I visited Rome recently, and as everyone knows, the saying goes that it wasn’t built in a day. TNP won’t be rebuilt in a day, either. In these times, things don’t operate as quickly as they used to - they haven’t in a while. The truth is, our manpower isn’t what it once was, and I won’t shy away from acknowledging reality. However, we still have individuals who share my desire and passion– and they will be the individuals who rebuild TNP. Alongside me, they are the ones who have slowly set up the building blocks that will help my vision be realized. Setting up those building blocks takes time, and then actually putting them together takes even longer. I would like for things to go at a faster pace, and I encourage those who want to make a difference in our region to join our executive staff. However, if we are not consistent with our goals and they change constantly, then we will always run out of time to realize them, and hence rebuild the region. If we are consistent and patient with our vision, it will have time to make the impact on the region we want it to. That is where our “strength” from stability comes from, from our patience and willingness to let our objectives be completed. Many of them already have been, and I will talk about them when the ministries are. From overseeing our executive staff and ministries. I have seen a lot of encouraging signs. I have seen us make progress, and I have seen my vision slowly realized, slowly but surely. As long as we don’t change horses mid-stream, we will continue our recovery.

General Administration

Consistent Cabinet Meetings

A practice that I’ve instituted in my time as Delegate is the weekly cabinet meeting. This wasn’t entirely new to our government, but it has not been in place for over two years. I recognized the absence of this structure as a missed opportunity for the members of the cabinet to coordinate and hold each other accountable. In retrospect, holding these meetings was likely one of the best decisions I’ve made during my time in office.

These meetings were intended to serve multiple purposes. They gave me the chance to catch up on the progress of my agenda in each ministry. They also helped me build harmony among the members of the cabinet and a sense of shared purpose. The meetings provided an opportunity to exchange ideas—ideas that were not only heard but often implemented in ways that improved the day-to-day operations of the administration. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, they created a structure for accountability, where the cabinet could hold each other—and me—responsible for meeting the agenda. These ideas will be realized in my plans for my next term.

Without this initiative, our productivity would’ve been nowhere close to where it was. The cabinet built a good level of chemistry through these regular interactions and became increasingly effective at collaborating on our action items. Ideas flowed more freely, and important issues were addressed more promptly. The level of accountability ensured that work was getting done, not just by individuals in isolation, but by a cohesive and united team. Safe to say, this practice will be continuing.

Executive Staff Management

One area where we’ve encountered persistent challenges during my tenure has been in the processing of executive staff applications. Those have taken longer than I would’ve liked, and that has caused me to step in on a couple of occasions. The administration will be more proactive with processing these applications, and I will ensure that my ministers and deputy ministers do so promptly. We will hold ourselves to a high standard in this process and will set a goal that a staff application is reviewed within 48 hours, with an absolute maximum turnaround time of 72 hours. By quickly integrating individuals into the executive, then we have a greater chance to make use of their talents.

I will also continue my hands-on management style. I’ll continue to stay in regular contact with my cabinet to provide support and help coordinate with them. I will also continue to drive activity in the executive by interacting with regular staff and doing ministerial tasks. I will continue to be an active presence in the community, whether it be on the RMB, Discord, or other areas.

External Ministries
To learn about my plans for each Ministry, click on its corresponding spoiler.
Foreign Affairs
Our Citizens Educated

Though it has only just launched, the FA Digest has been in development throughout the entire term, with its goal being to make a meaningful and lasting contribution to how you all understand and engage with foreign affairs. Foreign Affairs Education was something I had promised in my last platform and I’m pleased to see the foundation of this bear fruit. The first issue focused on summarizing the major events of the past year and offered context to them. Due to the bulk of this edition, it has taken a little longer than what was originally envisioned. The Digest will be released on a more timely basis in the future as it will be less general with the content it is covering–we don't expect to cover every single event.

It is too early for the administration to get a true idea of how this sort of project will be received in the future. Rest assured, however, the feedback we receive will be crucial to the development of future editions and will make it even more representative of the world’s events. It is my hope that this becomes more than a one-off, I want it to be something readers look forward to and see as an opportunity to catch up on the happenings of gameplay.

A Shake-Up of Our Network

The administration has had to navigate a particularly turbulent period in foreign affairs, one that was marked by a diplomatic fallout the NationStates community hadn’t seen the scale of in several years. Our initial approach to The Outback, while well-intentioned, ultimately crossed lines that some of our allies and partners found unacceptable. However, rather than doubling down or refusing to acknowledge reality, the administration chose to acknowledge our misstep and take full accountability. Our willingness to confront the issues was a huge help in mending fences with The Outback and allowed our regions to find common ground again. Through that process, TNP preserved its global reputation and reaffirmed its status as a capable player on the world stage.

Not all of our diplomatic partners agreed with how we responded to the situation, and as a result, the Pax Polaris Occidens (PPO) was dissolved, and our embassy with Lone Wolves United (LWU) was withdrawn. The loss of these alliances marks a significant shift in the structure and priorities of our foreign affairs network and opens the door for a refinement of our foreign policy, which will continue into the next term.

A New Treaty

While the road to reconciliation was not without its bumps, we were ultimately able to rebuild mutual trust and find common ground with The Outback. It wasn't easy, especially given the initial tensions between our regions after our approach, but our accountability and honesty allowed us to rebuild our trust. That renewed understanding resulted in the Treaty of Darwin. It has been in the works since the earliest days of my administration, and getting it to its current stage has been one of the most significant and rewarding diplomatic efforts of my term.

Though the treaty has not yet been formally ratified, I am incredibly proud of the progress that TNP has made. The fact that we could emerge from a low point in relations with an agreement on a treaty speaks volumes about the resilience and determination of our foreign affairs team, as well as the leadership on both sides. I firmly believe that The Outback has the potential to be a strong and reliable partner, and I look forward to seeing what we can accomplish together.

Building More Bonds

The Outback is not the only region with which we see strong potential to build deeper ties with. Throughout this term, the administration has been actively working to expand and diversify our diplomatic network as part of a broader strategy to reinforce TNP’s role in the wider gameplay community. The challenges we’ve faced have naturally drawn us closer to our allies within the Modern Gameplay Compact and The West Pacific, both of which have proven to be valuable and dependable partners throughout this ordeal. These relationships have only grown stronger in recent months, and we intend to build on that momentum.

I’m confident that the next term will see the successful negotiation of another treaty– one that will offer both military cooperation and cultural engagement opportunities. This agreement will not only benefit our region internally but also enhance TNP’s influence and reputation on the global stage.

A New Approach to Mentorship

While we’ve recently made our Committee on Foreign Relations more exclusive with the abolishment of our ambassadorial system, that does not mean new players should be robbed of a chance to make a name for themselves. The administration has done its best to give talent within the Ministry of Foreign Affairs opportunities to learn, grow, and contribute meaningfully. That is why we placed an emphasis on foreign affairs education– to raise awareness about the broader gameplay landscape, the history behind major regions, and the diplomatic implications of current events.

We plan to encourage more structured discussions among staff on ongoing developments in the gameplay sphere. While these discussions have been happening, they often lacked the structure necessary to make them truly effective. These discussions will now be led by the Delegate or the Minister of Foreign Affairs in a more meeting-like format, where questions are posed to prompt analysis and critical thinking about current events. This structure will give the conversations direction and purpose, making it easier for participants to follow along, share insights, and learn from each other. This will not only sharpen our understanding of current affairs but also facilitate a stronger sense of engagement and critical thinking.

Promising deputies will be given the opportunity to sit in on diplomatic talks, serving as observers and bookkeepers. This will give them first-hand insight into the foreign affairs process. Even without a formal position on the committee, capable and committed players can gain experience and prove themselves as the next generation of TNP’s diplomatic leaders through this avenue.

World Assembly Affairs
Recognition for TNPers

One of our biggest successes in the WA this term was the regular passage of commendations recognizing prominent TNPers– namely Tlomz, ROM, Siwale, and Sil Dorsett. This has long been a project of our ministry, and it has taken many forms over the years. It most recently gained new momentum through the Heroes of Valhalla program, and this has given fresh life to our efforts to commend our own. While the majority of resolutions passed this term were for our own nominees, we are far from finished– several more C&Cs for ourselves and our allies are already in development. This creates repeated opportunities to work with and demonstrate our commitment to many key allies who are also involved in the project. Even those outside of HoV have taken notice, and these efforts continue to strengthen our diplomatic ties across the gameplay sphere.

Prioritizing Resolution Quality

After a period of operating with more open NatSov officials leading our government and WA ministry, we have entered a phase of cooling. TNP has never fully embraced NatSov, even under my predecessor, and I have ensured that this remains the case during my term. While we share many of the concerns voiced by our allies in the Sovereign Seven, we continue to be skeptical and critical of some of the more vocal contributors to the General Assembly. However, our approach will always be centered around the quality and content of resolutions, rather than ideology alone.

At the end of the day, the will of the people will guide how we cast our vote. Foreign affairs considerations are often an important factor in these decisions, and we have seen these concerns increasingly influence the General Assembly. However, only in extraordinary circumstances will these external factors completely overshadow TNP’s regional interests and priorities. Our votes will remain guided by what is best for our region.

Our WA Position Strengthened

I am pleased to report that our region’s vote continues to be the largest in the World Assembly, and it remains a powerful tool in shaping the fate of resolutions. Over the course of my term, TNP’s endorsements have steadily increased, and we’ve managed to reach levels not seen since the end of last summer. However, recent fluctuations remind us that these gains are not guaranteed and must be diligently maintained by proactivity. Our endorsement numbers have proven to rise quickly, but they can just as easily fall if not carefully managed. I have been putting in the necessary effort to ensure that our endorsements remain strong and that we do not lose our position as the largest vote in the WA. Our commitment to securing and maintaining this standing is crucial not just for our influence in the Assembly, but for preserving TNP’s prominence and respect on the global stage.

During my delegacy, I have consistently voted early on proposals, ensuring that TNP’s influence is felt from the outset and that our vote has a greater impact. This proactive approach helps ensure that our region’s voice is always heard. By staying engaged in this way, we strengthen TNP’s position in the World Assembly and maintain our influence in important decisions.

1/20/2025, 12:00:06 PM EST: Chipoli voted for the World Assembly Resolution "Repeal "World Assembly Headquarters"".
2/24/2025, 12:00:12 PM EST: Chipoli voted for the World Assembly Resolution "Commend Haymarket Riot".
3/22/2025, 12:00:09 AM EDT: Chipoli voted against the World Assembly Resolution "Gender Affirmation Procedures".
4/11/2025, 6:00:27 AM GMT+2: Chipoli voted against the World Assembly Resolution "International Cybersecurity Convention".
5/1/2025, 12:00:33 AM EDT: Chipoli voted for the World Assembly Resolution "Repeal "Prevention of Torture"".

Moving forward we need to build on what we have started this term, and expand our roster of authors. With the Sovereign Seven repealing more than ever, there is a lot of room to rework the older resolutions, and find authors whose approach can win over even the most cynical minds in that alliance. Many of our treaties emphasize WA cooperation - we should focus more on that, as it has always been a strong point for TNP and one that we have somewhat forgotten lately. The ministry also needs to continue going back to basics, and keep up its recent pattern of posting the IFV threads and TGs on time.

Encouraging TNP Authorship

One of our key priorities moving forward should be to expand our roster of authors within the region. As the Sovereign Seven continues to repeal resolutions, there is a significant opportunity to revisit and rework older resolutions within the World Assembly with fresh perspectives. By encouraging TNP authorship, we can ensure that we have a diverse group of individuals within our region ready to tackle even the issues that face the WA. Supporting new authors, particularly those capable of winning over the more skeptical factions, will help reinforce TNP’s leadership in the World Assembly and continue our tradition of diplomatic influence.

We have a dormant mentorship program that still holds significant untapped potential, and it’s time we revisit it to revitalize the opportunity it presents. We can tap into the wealth of experience within more experienced authors and offer valuable guidance to some of our more promising staff members, who would have the insight of those who navigated the complexities of the General Assembly. This will help our newer members develop the skills necessary to write effective resolutions.

Defense
Plenty of Piling

The NPA has not had a chance to shine on the battlefield this term, as we have largely piled in key operations. We supported Delegates Terranical and Walkabout in The Outback, and then returned home to support my transition into the delegacy. After the Wellspring’s security crisis, we occupied the region for a significant portion of the term to help facilitate the lengthy process that would allow The Wellspring to regain an active governor. Finally, at the end of the term, we were called to pile in England for its own transition. This is not the action I imagined that the NPA would see at the beginning of the term, and it certainly isn’t flashy. These circumstances called for us to pile for an extended period of time, and while piling isn’t the most glamorous aspect of R/D, it is a necessary one.

Serving to Support

When our people are available for military gameplay, we also need to consider how to use them most effectively in operations. Over the past term, we’ve done excellent work as a reliable supporting partner, showing up consistently to assist our allies. This is where we currently shine, being the dependable partner that others know they can count on. I believe we can take that spirit and apply it to more dynamic and engaging operations, whether it be active raids or liberations. That means actively seeking out opportunities to participate in meaningful missions alongside allies, rather than just supporting in name or with minimal involvement. Many joint operations are planned solely to justify two regions sharing an update, often lacking any real strategic value or significance. Moving forward, I want to pursue opportunities where our involvement would be genuinely helpful and allow our troops to gain experience in meaningful settings.

The Call to Serve Returns


The Call to Serve program was a strong and engaging platform that gave members of the NPA an opportunity to share their personal stories and experiences with military gameplay on NBS Radio. It offered a behind-the-scenes look at what it’s like to be part of the NPA, making the experience feel more real and accessible to those who might be curious about joining. Showcasing these perspectives helps us demystify military gameplay and resonates with newer members of the region.

We need to bring that energy back and let people know just how rewarding the NPA experience can be. There’s a lot to share about R/D, and hearing it directly from our soldiers adds even more authenticity and impact. Reviving the program doesn’t require a massive overhaul; even a few episodes featuring current or former members talking about their experiences would go a long way in reigniting interest in the NPA. It’s a low-cost, high-reward initiative that could serve as a valuable outreach tool and remind our community of the opportunities that the NPA provides.

A New Approach To Engagement

I made encouraging activity and closer bonds in the NPA a big part of my platform last time, and I took a leading role in pushing for the organization of exclusive games and events for our soldiers. We made a genuine effort to bring those ideas to life, but were unable to do so this term. That does not mean this pursuit will be abandoned, and I remain committed to making them a reality in the future when time and resources allow.

However, the past four months have also made it increasingly clear that the NPA may need a different, more foundational approach to growth and engagement. At its core, what the NPA needs most right now is simply new people— recruits with the enthusiasm and curiosity to get involved and contribute. It seems like a simple solution, and was one often repeated during many, many election campaigns, the challenge lies in how we go about reaching those potential recruits. That’s where I believe we’ve fallen short in the past. There are many talented and interested individuals in our region, but they haven’t been effectively engaged or invited into the NPA. Through my work in Home Affairs, which I’ll discuss further in that ministry’s section, I believe we’ve found more direct and personal ways to reach those individuals and bring new life into our military. If we can better connect with those potential recruits, the activity and camaraderie will follow more naturally.
Internal Ministries
To learn about my plans for each Ministry, click on its corresponding spoiler.
Culture
Promise in Media

The Ministry of Culture experienced a turbulent and often uncertain term, having gone through three different ministers before finally gaining some stability with the fourth. These frequent changes in leadership naturally disrupted planning and progress, forcing us to constantly adapt to new circumstances. Only a small group of dedicated individuals were available to pick up the slack, and they stepped up admirably. As a result, we shifted to a slower, more deliberate pace than we’ve typically maintained in the past, a shift that was necessary to ensure the quality and sustainability of our efforts under the circumstances.

Despite the setbacks, we made meaningful progress, and we released the RP Spotlight radio show early in the term, which is a promising sign for the future of NBS Radio. Although the inconsistency in leadership delayed several projects, the resilience of the team allowed us to keep moving forward. With greater stability now in place, I’m confident that day-to-day operations will be smoother, more coordinated, and more productive. We also managed to release an edition of The North Star by the end of the term, which was a major achievement given the challenges we faced. Our media output is on an upward trajectory, and I’m hopeful that the foundation we've rebuilt this term will lead to even greater successes in the months ahead.

Getting Together With Allies

This term, we had the opportunity to participate in a number of joint cultural events that helped strengthen our ties with allies and engage our community. One of the highlights was our involvement in FrontierFest, a large-scale festival hosted by our close allies in Europeia. The event brought together several regions—including our allies in Carcassonne, The League & Concord, and Talonia—and featured a wide range of activities such as games and radio shows. It was a vibrant experience that showed how much fun we can have when we work closely with our friends across NationStates.

In addition to FrontierFest, we successfully organized two game nights with Vibonia—one held on our server and the other on theirs. While these events were on a smaller scale, they were just as valuable and offered opportunities for direct interaction between members of our communities and laid the groundwork for deeper ties between the regions. I’m pleased that we managed to successfully organize and launch these events, especially considering the broader challenges faced by the Ministry. Building on this momentum, I hope to see us expand our event calendar next term and collaborate even further with our allies.

Regular Events Rejuvenated

I was pleased to see the return of some of our more regular events, such as Theme Thursday. These events were carried out successfully, drawing a solid number of entries and a wide variety of winners. The return of these more traditional events gave our community something familiar to engage with and generated excitement. While this is certainly a promising start, there is always room to build on this momentum, especially now that we have much-needed stability in the Minister of Culture position. With consistent leadership, we can shift our focus toward creating a more structured way of planning our events, for instance, the development of an official event calendar. This would help ensure events are better coordinated and prepared, which would boost our participation. Such a framework would open the door for larger, more ambitious festivals and cultural projects that can engage a broader range of TNPers.

Boosting Participation

We have to do more than simply increasing the number of publications or radio shows to attract new participants. While these forms of media certainly have their place and should absolutely continue, they aren’t, on their own, the key to deeper engagement. That’s why I will continue to support expanding our media presence, but with a stronger emphasis on interactivity and real-time involvement.

Our events need to draw people in and make them active participants, not just observers. This means placing more focus on live radio shows, interactive formats, and publications that respond to ongoing events in the moment, rather than simply recapping things after the fact. To support this shift, we must also prioritize the Regional Message Board (RMB) as a central space for cultural engagement and outreach, which I will discuss further in the next section.

Home Affairs
The Welcome Wagon Rolls On

One of Home Affairs’ key achievements this term has been the return of the Welcome Wagon. While we still have a long way to go in improving integration across our region, the reintroduction of the Welcome Wagon marks a meaningful first step in that direction. I want to extend my gratitude to all the volunteers whose dedication and effort have been instrumental in getting this initiative up and running once more. Currently, the Welcome Wagon’s primary task has been to greet and welcome new users who join our Discord server. However, a simple "hi" is not enough. To ensure that newcomers truly feel at home, the role of the Welcome Wagon must be a greater one. They must be guided through the various aspects of our region, whether it be our executive staff, our unique cards program, or our world of roleplay.

Going forward, members of the Welcome Wagon will take a more hands-on role and actively engage with new arrivals, by highlighting what our region has to offer, answering their questions, and helping them find their place within our community. The first interactions a newcomer has upon joining often determine whether they stay for the long haul, and it’s our responsibility to make those first moments count.

A New Purpose

As we look ahead to the next term, it’s clear that Home Affairs will have to be the single most important ministry in our government. It is through Home Affairs that we will be able to fulfill the plans and promises made across all aspects of government. But to do that, we must acknowledge a difficult truth: The current methods of engagement no longer work as they once did. They fail to capture the attention of newer players or to foster the kind of long-term involvement our community needs.

This upcoming term, our strategy will pivot toward meeting players where they are. We will not continue trying to drag users to platforms they rarely visit. Instead, we will bring the game, and our government, directly to them. That means centering the Regional Message Board (RMB) as the main hub for the majority of our regional activity. The RMB will become the front line for engagement, and we will lead the charge in making it a vibrant, interactive space once again. TNP is a NationStates region after all, and the RMB is our regional home on the site. We owe it to ourselves to make better use of it and to bring the game we love back into our native space.

Using The Regional Message Board

Continuing on from the previous section, every initiative going forward will be designed with the RMB in mind. Events, gameplay, WA debates, Q&As, cultural spotlights, and community-building activities will all be on the RMB. Players will be able to participate fully in any activity from the RMB alone. However, for those who want a deeper experience, our offsite platforms like the forum and Discord will offer content in greater detail. The goal is not to replace offsite engagement, but to enhance it organically by building interest and momentum on-site first. I emphasize that this project will take quite a long time - if it will truly succeed, it may come to my potential predecessor to maintain and continue. The best we can do is lay the foundations, and we’re looking to do just that.

Over time, as players grow more comfortable using the RMB and are exposed to the broader scope of what NationStates has to offer, we expect curiosity and participation to grow naturally. And when they’re ready to explore more, we’ll be prepared to guide them not with pressure, but with opportunity. This method creates a much healthier and more sustainable path toward long-term involvement.

Ultimately, we must accept that recruitment alone will not secure our future. We cannot rely solely on bringing in new players– we must also better engage the ones we already have. Too many of our regionmates are waiting to be inspired, and there is no reason why we cannot be the ones to do just that. Our external affairs have been stronger than they’ve been in a long time, and now it’s time to match that strength internally. This term will be dedicated to doing just that, and I hope we will discover many new faces and awesome regionmates in the process.

Gameside Advocates

The Gameside Advocates will continue serving under the guidance of the Home Affairs ministry and will essentially become an extension of it. They will be a crucial component of our new integration and community engagement methods, and will actively participate in our debates and events held on the Regional Message Board. They will also continue to promote the agenda of the administration and the initiatives of each ministry, and along that they will answer questions about TNP, explain our position in the World Assembly. They’ll also encourage citizenship and ministry involvement in a way that resonates with players where they are, and as the frontline of our gameside presence, they’ll play a core role in making the RMB our region’s most vibrant space for community and government alike.

Miscellaneous
Technology

We managed to get a few editions of the WADP released this term, and another one is in the works. While I am grateful to Kaschovia for working on and maintaining the program, it is best if there is more than one person with access to our technology– I’m sure we learned this lesson before. That way, it will be more easily maintained if tools break, and will be released more consistently as more individuals have their eyes on it. The administration is also exploring tools that have the potential to improve our WA levels– more specifically, with the retention of new nations joining the World Assembly. I’m pushing for our tech to set it up for our region, and it is my hope that it will be available for use early in the next term.

Cards

With the internal aspect of the region being even more heavily prioritized, cards are an area that I will explore as well. Many of our friends and allies (e.g, The West Pacific and The Wellspring) have accomplished card programs, and there is potential to collaborate with them to drive up the activity in our own cards guild. We could potentially host joint giveaways together by combining our resources or allowing residents of each region to participate in our respective card programs– I’m open to other ideas, but those are just examples. Going back to the idea of the RMB being at the center of discussion, I want it to be a space where members of our cards guild can participate in cards discussions, trade cards, host giveaways, and expose our program to the gameside players.

Conclusion

I see myself as the sort of individual who learns from his mistakes, someone who gets better as time progresses, someone who takes accountability, and someone who simply wants the best for his region. We’ve made plenty of progress this term, and I know that we can do a whole lot more. I’m excited for what’s to come in the future, and I feel just as ready to take on the largest responsibility in the region as I ever have been. Our region’s issues haven’t all gone away in a day, and as always, there is still a lot of work to be done. I believe that I have the best understanding of those issues of almost anyone in the region, and am the most well-equipped to solve them. I sincerely hope that I made a convincing argument for why you all should stick by me, and I appreciate each and every individual who took the time out of their day to read my platform. For those with questions, I am reachable on NationStates via telegram, on the regional forum via private message, and on Discord via DM.







 
Hi, you know me, I'm the former MoWAA under your administration (you'll note that that applies to both of you I'm asking this question to, ha!). I have just one question, one that's been bearing on me as of recent as the General Assembly has evolved for the better because of the great citizens of The North Pacific over the past year:

What differentiates a good General Assembly resolution from a bad one, in your opinion?
 
Hi, you know me, I'm the former MoWAA under your administration (you'll note that that applies to both of you I'm asking this question to, ha!). I have just one question, one that's been bearing on me as of recent as the General Assembly has evolved for the better because of the great citizens of The North Pacific over the past year:

What differentiates a good General Assembly resolution from a bad one, in your opinion?
Hi Jinkies! Thanks for the question.

In short, a good General Assembly resolution is one that is well-written and achieves the goal it set out to do - it is one that targets a critical issue (examples are Civil Rights, Moral Decency, and Social Justice) and effectively combats it while leaving room for flexibility when necessary, while bringing as much positive change as possible. A poor resolution does the opposite of that. To be more specific, a bad resolution gets bogged down in unnecessary specifics or tries to micromanage things that don’t really need that level of control. Bad resolutions tend to miss the bigger picture and can create more problems than they solve. Those resolutions end up being more about writing legislation for the sake of passing it rather than doing anything useful.
 
Some questions off the top of my head:

1. Do you consider yourself IntFed or NatSov? Also do you consider your voting record in WA in the last term to contradict your past positions? If not, why?

2. Do you commit to not overriding the regional forum vote on GA resolutions if the vote swings against your own vote?

3. Am I considered a "TNP author" for the purpose of your manifesto? Also am I on your list of voting against due to authorship?

4. Who would mentor new WA authors? I don't assume Ghost but who else is active these days?

5. Given that the "cynical minds" in the S7 consist of plenty of people who would philosophically prefer if the GA passes NOTHING (and effectively abolish this part of the NationStates game altogether), how do you think you can persuade them?

6. Who would run cards? Do you genuinely consider cards to continue to be viable given the changes to Cloudflare etc?

More questions later
 
Last edited:
Chipoli, I'm very proud of the work you put in not just as Delegate this past term, but all along the way to get to this point. You've been a constant presence in the community and the government and your growth has been evident from those early days in the WA ministry to your contributions in the many FA spaces we've had to be in as of late. I got to say, I don't think you've done yourself a favor in one very key way: you have not made it easy for the region at large to appreciate and grasp the things you have done this term. Communication has eluded the government for going on a year at this point, across multiple administrations, and I think that reflects in our turnover. It is a big deal when a sitting delegate does not win the office when seeking it again. The region has to be have confidence that even in turbulent times, there is a steady hand at the wheel. I feel compelled to speak on this point because our government's admittedly spotty record in keeping people up to date kind of forces my hand.

I agree that the regular implementation of cabinet meetings is one of the most important and useful things you have brought to the executive. These are not new and unique to you, they happened in my term too, and quite often in the old days, but they have never been this regular, this reliable, or this useful certainly recently but most certainly since those ancient delegates. I have never seen the government as dialed in and aware of the bigger picture, at least on the cabinet level, which was a refreshing change of pace from nearly every previous delegate I served under. We dived into issues, sometimes taking hours to do so, and we came out of them with a clear set of goals and an idea of where to go next. I've seen that play out in text in past cabinets, over the course of weeks, but in these voice chats (with a healthy dose of typing) we simply covered so much more ground. I never worried that our cabinet couldn't figure out how to respond to a crisis, or what initiative or policy to shoot for, and I think every cabinet member can attest that we had a pretty good idea of where everyone was at, how our areas intersected, and where to go next. It is a shame the region couldn't experience that confidence by observing what we did.

I have seen you live up to your self-described hands-on approach. I have witnessed the IFVs you helped finish, the executive staff applications you accepted, the editing assistance for pieces of writing that needed a little extra push, the statements and speeches that you always took care to make sure ended up in your voice, and your own words. I will confess that I only wish you had done more of it - the situation in this region has been dire for a long time, and our staffing so limited, that these moments came up far more often than we would have liked, and a bit more willingness to take it on would have made these things even smoother, and avoided those times where we began to fall short. I have always appreciated the collaborative and team-based approach you leaned into, I just felt that we could have used a bit more direct direction at times.

I am immensely proud of our work in the external ministries. When Culture was firing on all cylinders, we had some great things going. Our WA contributions continued to be a standout, and you have been the first Delegate in almost a year to consistently gain endorsements over the course of the term after a very concerning slow decline, exacerbated by our constant transitions. And we navigated one of the most complex periods in GP more or less unscathed - and that was thanks to the course you chose to take. Recall that while you were on your trip to Europe, the system of diplomatic networks that defined this game for three years completely unraveled. We absolutely had to have our eyes on these developments, and we needed to continue to be strong and solid in these areas. We succeeded. But every choice has consequences, and at a time where our internal ministries cried out for help, burdened in a way they hadn't been in a long time, but that was becoming quite familiar from three successive administrations that struggled with these problems, we simply weren't there enough to respond. We didn't have a chance to really course correct until you returned from your trip, at which point we had barely two weeks. I am confident that the plan you outlined for HA, a plan this entire government is on board with and was involved in planning during one of those productive cabinet meetings, is one of our best shots to finally addressing this problem. I could see how your platform connected to it in the various ministries, but I felt you ought to have put it front and center, and first, to signify just how important it is to your agenda in a second term. This is our way out of the mess, a dramatic change in how our community engages with its players, and a bit of an experiment as to what effect it will have on our forum and Discord server. I felt that many people deciding how to vote in this election simply will not appreciate the stakes you have set up, or just what the implications of this strategy are. I would appreciate it if you could take some time to elaborate further on that plan, and highlight it in greater detail. It is, to my mind, the single biggest difference between you and your opponent, and quite possibly, for me if no one else, the deciding factor in my vote.

Those of us who have served in government with you know how willing you were to try new things, to spend time going over again and again not only what was in progress, but what still had to be done. We know you delegated a lot of the tracking and follow-up to your chief of staff, and that it made a marked improvement in reaching goals, but that you kept up with those same things, and hammered them home every time we were all in the same room. Your commitment and your devotion to the work is obvious and appreciated. I wish it hadn't caused you to spend as much time of your vacation as you did on those difficult and sometimes frustrating diplomatic talks, but we did appreciate having you there even at your most removed. And the most admirable thing, in my view, was seeing you commit to a course that proved to be the wrong one, recognize the error, and work toward making amends for it. We started the term working on a treaty with The Outback, lost the opportunity when we participated in the infamous incident, and are now here poised to pass that same treaty after doing the hard thing, something that few proud players in this game are willing to do: acknowledge and apologize for a mistake. Your willingness to risk looking weak, to invite scrutiny or ridicule, for the sake of doing the right thing, is actually a strength in my eyes. I know other people in other regions appreciate it, and the outreach you have done with these places, the demonstration of TNP's loyalty and sincerity, go a long way in keeping our place in this game strong. Regardless of the style or words you use, your heart and authenticity shine through and are worth far more than flashy speeches and big words ever could be. I believe that as you have continued to get better as a player, a politician, and a leader, you will only keep getting better, and I want to give you a chance to continue to do that. I think you've more than proved you earned it.
 
It's been interesting serving under you and I've been impressed by how you've performed as delegate.

However there has been times where I've found myself frustrated by how you operate as delegate. There are times where you could use some of the things that are available to delegates that would provide the government with the impetus to keep going in your absence, and you don't, and that can become a problem. It hasn't yet, but it could be in the future. I hope if you win re-election, you'll operate with more flexibility.

I don't really have a question, though if there's a reply you can give that can assuage my concerns, then I'd appreciate it.
 
Do you consider yourself IntFed or NatSov? Also do you consider your voting record in WA in the last term to contradict your past positions? If not, why?
Hello, Simone! Thank you for your questions. I don't subscribe to either the IntFed or NatSov label, as I don't think either of them entirely fit me. While I don't want resolutions that are narrow in scope or those that target niche issues to be passed or encouraged, I don't want every resolution on the books to be repealed as I believe there is still plenty of effective legislation in the WA and doing so would too much.

My voting record wasn't about my positions, as I always voted according with the forum vote during my delegacy. A couple exceptions had to be made when the vote was tied and I had to use the recommendation of the MoWAA - afterwards, the forum vote tended to stay tied or lined up with my vote, and if it went against my initial vote I would have switched it. I can't really answer whether or not my voting record as Delegate contradicted my past positions since I did not vote with ideology in mind, but if I was forced to pick then I'd say it aligned closer to what I voted like in the past.
2. Do you commit to not overriding the regional forum vote on GA resolutions if the vote swings against your own vote?
I cannot say that there will never be a single circumstance where I won't vote differently than the forum vote, (such as when the goals of the administration must be realized, or when the MGC sanctions are in effect) but I will do my very best to abide it even when the forum vote swings. My vote should not be unilateral, and our citizens must always have their input taken into consideration.
3. Am I considered a "TNP author" for the purpose of your manifesto? Also am I on your list of voting against due to authorship?
I am always happy to support TNP authors in the World Assembly, as long as their proposals are high quality and well-written. We have voted against TNP authors in the past (including myself a fair bit ago) who wrote proposals that were not up to our standard. I don't maintain a specific list of WA Authors I will always vote against - voting for personal reasons would be improper of me as Delegate. So no, you would not be on that list because it does not exist.
4. Who would mentor new WA authors? I don't assume Ghost but who else is active these days?
We have plenty of folks in the region who have authored resolutions, so we have a few options. I won't list all of the examples, instead just providing some of them. Our current Minister of World Assembly Affairs, Fachumonn. Other authors currently in the WA Ministry include Comfed, Gorundu, and me. For the SC, Ghost would probably be the best mentor for those seeking to make their mark in that chamber. Some of our authors are also outside our executive staff, and I'd encourage them to join us and help out.
5. Given that the "cynical minds" in the S7 consist of plenty of people who would philosophically prefer if the GA passes NOTHING (and effectively abolish this part of the NationStates game altogether), how do you think you can persuade them?
My approach to the S7 will be trying to find a common ground with them. There are certain proposals that both parties believe are unnecessary and should be removed from the books, and we will always agree on that. However, some members of the S7 would more likely be open to at least a couple resolutions being passed - those being resolutions that are well-written, address a significant need and make a large-scale impact. There are a couple who would likely be opposed to almost all resolutions, and simply put I don't believe our resources should be used to try and convince them to change their ideology.
6. Who would run cards? Do you genuinely consider cards to continue to be viable given the changes to Cloudflare etc?
There are still a number of folks in our cards guild who are really passionate about cards, and I imagine that it would be one of those individuals that would lead it. While the new cloudflare changes do slow card farming down, they can be bypassed using scripts, and I don't think those along have killed any and all interest in cards. There is still a lot of potential to be untapped within that community and we will be working on doing that.

It's been interesting serving under you and I've been impressed by how you've performed as delegate.

However there has been times where I've found myself frustrated by how you operate as delegate. There are times where you could use some of the things that are available to delegates that would provide the government with the impetus to keep going in your absence, and you don't, and that can become a problem. It hasn't yet, but it could be in the future. I hope if you win re-election, you'll operate with more flexibility.

I don't really have a question, though if there's a reply you can give that can assuage my concerns, then I'd appreciate it.
I appreciate your comments, both the positive and the negative. If there's anything I can appreciate about you MadJack, it's your openness and your honesty.

To address your point, I indeed was operating on a slightly lower level while not on an official absence in the middle of April. We happened to be going through a foreign affairs crisis at the time which I was able to handle successfully, bringing our relations with The Outback back to where they were previously and managing to stay on relatively positive terms with the New Pacific Order and the Augustin Alliance, the latter in particular. I chose to be the steward of the ship during the time because I believed that I was the best equipped to handle that situation, and I'd say that I'd be proven correct. Our internal activity also went off without a hitch, as I communicated with those around me very frequently, and a meeting was even held to ensure that we were maintaining on progress on the domestic front. I don't foresee myself having a period like that during the next four months - I'd say that I'm even more available in the summer, even, now that my morning and early afternoon isn't as busy. However if something comes up, I will value the input of my cabinet just like I did this time around and factor that into my decision. Given my focus on the internal side of things and the progress we've made there and our relatively good position externally, I believe the region will be in a good spot this time around if someone else took temporary charge.

I also want to acknowledge Ghost's post - I read it, and I thank you for showing your faith in my capabilities and administration. I will have to sit down and address it at a greater length than I can at this immediate point in time, later this day most likely.
 
Last edited:
I think people are under the impression that our manpower issues can be fixed just like that. Four months is by far not enough to create a solution and fix the problem, especially when this is a game we play in our free time. The expectations people have these days for the Delegacy and the executive in general are unreal. This is why people say that being Delegate is like having a full-time job. It's not, and it never should be. I'm quite disappointed by the apparent lack of understanding of this and the insistence that we need to change the Delegate every time a major multi-term issue isn't fixed within a couple of months. These aren't issues that are exclusive to us, and we need to realise that it's simply untenable to create expectations for ourselves that we can never ever fulfil.

I think Chipoli has made great steps towards a solution for this manpower problem. These nebulous "fixes" are incredibly hard to execute, but given enough time and consistency between different administrations, it's possible to solve it.

Chipoli, your challenger claims a bunch of things that I do not necessarily agree with. I think you've done a wonderful job this term, especially given the cards you were dealt. You had to make decisions that were very difficult, and despite pressure from all sides, you kept a cool head. You are someone who might take longer when taking decisive action, but that's only because you consider all options and ultimately arrive at the one you think is best for our region. You're a good leader and someone we can rely on as a region to push us forward.

I endorse this campaign for the Delegacy of The North Pacific.
 
My impression (as someone who stopped using discord) is that the regional government appears relatively inactive. The regional forum does not appear to be utilised in the ways that it once was. Even looking at the delegate’s government subforum, almost all of them have had a post in months.

I am wondering if you consider this to be a problem? or is there some overwhelming amount of activity on the discord that means this perceived lack of activity is not such a problem.

If it is an issue, I am curious about what specific ideas you have to breathe life into the forum again.

On a related note, I personally love the RMB and find the activity there is fantastic. It used to be a great way to build connections with people in game, and potentially have them also participate in other areas - like the forum, discord, rp communities etc. My perception is that members of the government are not tuned into that community and don’t really participate in it. I also feel that it’s important from a security perspective. If the government is active and present, it helps build trust when there are disruptive behaviours there.

Is this a problem and if so, how would you address it? Do you imagine your personal activity and involvement in the rmb community would improve if elected?
 
I am confident that the plan you outlined for HA, a plan this entire government is on board with and was involved in planning during one of those productive cabinet meetings, is one of our best shots to finally addressing this problem. I could see how your platform connected to it in the various ministries, but I felt you ought to have put it front and center, and first, to signify just how important it is to your agenda in a second term. This is our way out of the mess, a dramatic change in how our community engages with its players, and a bit of an experiment as to what effect it will have on our forum and Discord server. I felt that many people deciding how to vote in this election simply will not appreciate the stakes you have set up, or just what the implications of this strategy are. I would appreciate it if you could take some time to elaborate further on that plan, and highlight it in greater detail. It is, to my mind, the single biggest difference between you and your opponent, and quite possibly, for me if no one else, the deciding factor in my vote.
Thank you for the question, Ghost, and I'm pleased to hear that you are in agreement with my plan. The shift to putting the RMB at the center of our regional life is a lot more than a part of my platform - it is the core strategy, admittedly one that maybe I should've shone the spotlight on. The way I see it, it's the best way to adapt to the new reality that, slowly across many terms, has taken over our region. The main areas where our community comes together, which is our Discord and our regional forums, have become too detached from the game itself. That's the primary reason why there is now a growing disconnect between our newer members and other gamesiders and the broader life of the region.

What we’re doing now is something different. We're making the RMB our space. It’s the space that NationStates gives us, it’s where our nation is, and we need to reclaim it as the hub of activity. None of us spawned into our forums or Discord; we created our nation and interacted with the game itself, and one way or another, we found our way to the offsite community. We need to do a lot more, though, than increase the volume of posts that we make. We need to design our events with the RMB in mind. We want all of our discussions to start on the RMB and get people to know and care about who is in the government and what they are doing. Many of us think of them as an afterthought, and they feel the same way about us. Right now, it's as if we are living in our own separate worlds, and that needs to change. Our communities need to be brought together.

This is a cultural shift. It changes the expectations of what it means to be involved. It lowers the barrier to entry for new players and puts the game back in the game. There will always be a place for people to explore our offsite community, and it will now support the experience, not gatekeep it. If we get more players engaged on the RMB, they’ll naturally get start to get curious. They’ll want to participate more, ask more questions, and explore more of the region. That’s when the forum and Discord become not just places you’re told to join, but places that make sense because the interest is already there. I believe this approach can fundamentally reshape how we interact with the region, and how the region interacts with the game, and the most important thing is that it’s built directly on what NationStates provides. That’s why I’ve made it a top priority. This new approach, in my eyes, is the way forward.
My impression (as someone who stopped using discord) is that the regional government appears relatively inactive. The regional forum does not appear to be utilised in the ways that it once was. Even looking at the delegate’s government subforum, almost all of them have had a post in months.

I am wondering if you consider this to be a problem? or is there some overwhelming amount of activity on the discord that means this perceived lack of activity is not such a problem.

If it is an issue, I am curious about what specific ideas you have to breathe life into the forum again.
Thank you for the question, McM, you certainly bring a unique perspective as someone who has a good understanding of both the gameside and broader community. Over time, the region has evolved in the way it communicates. For as long as I've been here, which is around three years, Discord has been the main hub of our government's activity, and of course, that is known to everyone. This term, I've restarted the practice of cabinet meetings in our Executive Discord server, which gives us more of an incentive to conduct our business over there. Our forum activity has generally remained constant throughout my time, and as such, our number of posts here does not strike me as unusual. I personally believe that as long as there is a healthy amount of activity elsewhere and our government remains on its toes, then we remain in a good spot.

There can always be more activity on the forums, and we can use the new practice of cabinet meetings to drive some of that activity. For instance, we could post our notes from our meetings, with the exception of the material that needs to be protected for operational security reasons, and give updates to those who more regularly lurk on our forums and keep them in the loop as well.
On a related note, I personally love the RMB and find the activity there is fantastic. It used to be a great way to build connections with people in game, and potentially have them also participate in other areas - like the forum, discord, rp communities etc. My perception is that members of the government are not tuned into that community and don’t really participate in it. I also feel that it’s important from a security perspective. If the government is active and present, it helps build trust when there are disruptive behaviours there.

Is this a problem and if so, how would you address it? Do you imagine your personal activity and involvement in the rmb community would improve if elected?
I do think the government's activity on the RMB can be greatly improved, and that is why the jewel of this campaign will be all about increasing our activity there and getting those folks engaged. I personally make an effort to read it and interact with some of our gamesiders if the time allows me to. I have already elaborated on my plans in the response to Ghost's question, but in short, we want to bring ourselves to the RMB. We'll be incorporating our discussions, cultural events, and games into that platform and, in general, be as visible as possible and let the gamesiders know that we really do exist. I and my pick for Minister of Home Affairs will lead the charge on this, and it's safe to say that by implementing this plan, my involvement in the RMB community would increase significantly.
 
I think people are under the impression that our manpower issues can be fixed just like that. Four months is by far not enough to create a solution and fix the problem, especially when this is a game we play in our free time. The expectations people have these days for the Delegacy and the executive in general are unreal. This is why people say that being Delegate is like having a full-time job. It's not, and it never should be. I'm quite disappointed by the apparent lack of understanding of this and the insistence that we need to change the Delegate every time a major multi-term issue isn't fixed within a couple of months. These aren't issues that are exclusive to us, and we need to realise that it's simply untenable to create expectations for ourselves that we can never ever fulfil.

I think Chipoli has made great steps towards a solution for this manpower problem. These nebulous "fixes" are incredibly hard to execute, but given enough time and consistency between different administrations, it's possible to solve it.

Chipoli, your challenger claims a bunch of things that I do not necessarily agree with. I think you've done a wonderful job this term, especially given the cards you were dealt. You had to make decisions that were very difficult, and despite pressure from all sides, you kept a cool head. You are someone who might take longer when taking decisive action, but that's only because you consider all options and ultimately arrive at the one you think is best for our region. You're a good leader and someone we can rely on as a region to push us forward.

I endorse this campaign for the Delegacy of The North Pacific.
Thank you, Ruben! Your words of support are greatly appreciated, and it’s been a pleasure to work alongside you for the past four months, and I hope we are able to continue that.
 
Chipoli, I am very impressed by the way you are conducting yourself during this campaign. You seem calm, collected and equipped with a vision for the future of this region. Having reviewed both campaigns, I will be supporting you in this election. (At least I think so, I am woefully indecisive.)

However, what initially drew me to your challenger’s campaign over your’s was his sense of urgency over the manpower and activity issues that this region faces. I am not trying to say that you don’t have that same urgency, but I do have one question:

Do you treat the manpower issue as the greatest threat that TNP faces, as in one that directly threatens the future of this region? If so, would you introduce a once-in-a-generation governmental effort to recruit new committed and enthusiastic staffers, or would you take a different, perhaps calmer approach?
(Apologies if that’s a bit vague.)
 
Chipoli, I am very impressed by the way you are conducting yourself during this campaign. You seem calm, collected and equipped with a vision for the future of this region. Having reviewed both campaigns, I will be supporting you in this election. (At least I think so, I am woefully indecisive.)

However, what initially drew me to your challenger’s campaign over your’s was his sense of urgency over the manpower and activity issues that this region faces. I am not trying to say that you don’t have that same urgency, but I do have one question:

Do you treat the manpower issue as the greatest threat that TNP faces, as in one that directly threatens the future of this region? If so, would you introduce a once-in-a-generation governmental effort to recruit new committed and enthusiastic staffers, or would you take a different, perhaps calmer approach?
(Apologies if that’s a bit vague.)
Thank you for your support, Ara, and I'm personally pleased to see you back in the region, as you've done good work for it in the past.

Our manpower issue is the greatest threat that TNP faces, and we've been trying to fix it for so long. Looking back, a decline in our regional activity was somewhat of an inevitability post F/S, seeing as we lost half of the nations that would've otherwise been in the region - we're at our lowest point in that regard since 2017. I can't really attribute the blame to any particular person, but the facts are the facts: this problem was growing for a while, across multiple administrations, and suddenly it is now at a point where we have to take drastic action - we have made plenty of progress during my term, but we can always do more and that's what will happen. The administration has been preparing an advertisement for the executive staff for many weeks now as part of a larger campaign we will launch, and we're at the point where it can be launched on day one of the next term, once we transition from the current one. As I have said earlier, I have a very specific plan in mind to recruit new and executive staffers. That campaign I mentioned earlier is one of the things we will be doing, but it is not my main strategy.

In a nutshell, there has been a huge disconnect between the gameside and offsite community for a while now. Instead of trying to bring them to us, we will bring ourselves to them - our cultural events, games, and debates will happen there. They will be included in everything we do, and naturally, once they are exposed to who the members of the government are and what we do, they will be more interested in it, and will be willing to participate in it directly (e.g, the planning of the events or games).
 
In your campaign, you mention the successful negotiation of another treaty that will offer both military cooperation and cultural engagement. Does this mean that you already know who you hope that this treaty will be with?

Also on the topic of building bonds, with there being a lot of change at the moment with regards to our relationships with the GCR and bigger UCRs at the moment, isn't it time that we also start looking towards building stronger ties with some of the smaller UCRs to continue to grow our relationships in that area too?
 
In your campaign, you mention the successful negotiation of another treaty that will offer both military cooperation and cultural engagement. Does this mean that you already know who you hope that this treaty will be with?
I have a region in mind, and we are actively discussing the possibility of formalizing our relationship. For Opsec reasons, and because nothing has been finalized, I can't reveal what that region is quite yet. The possibility of another treaty next term is very real.
Also on the topic of building bonds, with there being a lot of change at the moment with regards to our relationships with the GCR and bigger UCRs at the moment, isn't it time that we also start looking towards building stronger ties with some of the smaller UCRs to continue to grow our relationships in that area too?
That is something we will be looking to do, yes. We can't neglect any part of the international sphere, and we must show some love to the smaller UCRs as well if they show that they can be viable partners for us and build bonds with them, whether it's via a forum embassy, an onsite embassy, or a formalized agreement.
 
Back
Top