[SC - passed] Injunct UEPU

Status
Not open for further replies.
Chipoli

Chipoli

Security Councilor
-
-
-
Pronouns
he/him
TNP Nation
Chipoli
Discord
chipoli
sc.jpg

Injunct UEPU
Category: Injunction | Nominee: UEPU
Proposed by: Minskiev, Co-authored by: Westinor, Ostrovskiy, and Obrimenja | Onsite Topic​

The Security Council,

Sensing that it once again falls upon this council to restore just government where it has fallen at the hands of international fellowship’s detractors,

Animated that the community of the UEPU, a vibrant paradise of welcoming nations, has banded together to create a stable, pacifist frontier in an age of tumult for those who might dare to stand as an exemplar of freedom and stability,

Thrilled that the UEPU has successfully implemented all the earmarks of a thriving government, including its own constitution, justice system, and WA programs, safely tucked away from the turbulent storms and terrible conflicts that rattle the multiverse day after day,

Brightened up by the UEPU’s flourishing state as a frontier for newer nations to reside in, providing ample opportunity to enjoy close ties to their region-mates free from undue hostility, stemming from its encouraging community and inviting atmosphere,

Certain that the UEPU deserves the chance to persevere as a group of tightly-knit nations working to provide a shelter from the storm for the world’s countries with all the grit needed to succeed without a Governor’s protection, free from the harm and hostility of raider forces that pick on their humble abodes for no reason other than amusement,

Wishing to provide protection for the noble residents of the UEPU by making sure that no assailant can transfer the Governorship into their hands, permanently locking away the region,

Emboldened that, with the passage of appropriate Security Council measures to ensure the UEPU’s longevity, this courageous group of nations can continue to prosper, set an example for all frontiers, and serve to say that, yes, there is hope,

Hereby injuncts UEPU.
Click to expand...
Note: Only votes from TNP WA nations, NPA personnel, and those on NPA deployments will be counted. If you do not meet these requirements, please add (non-WA) or something of that effect to your vote. If you are on an NPA deployment without being formally registered as an NPA member, name your deployed nation in your vote.
Voting Instructions:
  • Vote For if you want the Delegate to vote For the resolution.
  • Vote Against if you want the Delegate to vote Against the resolution.
  • Vote Abstain if you want the Delegate to Abstain from voting on this resolution.
  • Vote Present if you are personally abstaining from this vote.
Detailed opinions with your vote are appreciated and encouraged!

ForAgainstAbstainPresent
10101
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Overview
This proposal seeks to injunct the region of UEPU, essentially preventing it from being converted from a frontier into a stronghold, and as a result prevents the region from becoming a raider colony. This proposal would provide additional aid in the liberation of UEPU, which we see as in our interests to defend, as it is occupied by many raider forces such as The Brotherhood of Malice, who we currently are in conflict with.

Recommendation
The region in question has been invaded by our adversaries on the battlefield, and we will continue to support the effort of expelling them from the region. This proposal would prevent it from being transformed into one of their trophy regions, which would therefore eliminate the native population entirely.

For the above reasons, the Ministry of World Assembly Affairs recommends a vote For the at-vote SC resolution, "Injunct UEPU".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
For. As a member of cabinet I feel obliged to support current regional IC policy.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top