[GA, passed] Sustainable Aquaculture Protocols

Status
Not open for further replies.

Cookiemonster

Lost Butterfly
Pronouns
She/Her
TNP Nation
Isabella van der Feltz
Discord
isabella_respublica
ga.jpg

Sustainable Aquaculture Protocols
Category: Environmental | Industry Affected: Agriculture
Proposed by: Simone Republic | Onsite Topic


The World Assembly,

Noting its historical interest in regulating the fishing industry (GARs #199, #409), which has a clear impact on WA states that share maritime borders, as well as fishing fleets that cross borders;

Acknowledging that, with depletion of fish stocks and the development of fish farms (aquaculture) in some WA states, a clear need has arisen to regulate aquaculture to ensure sustainability and safeguard cross pollution into other WA states through connected bodies of water;

Thus desiring a common solution across the WA for WA states that engage in aquaculture; hereby:

  1. Defines:
    • "Aquaculture" to mean husbandry of aquatic organisms such as fish, oysters, crabs, prawns, and others in (at least a) partly artificial setting, and "aquaculture products" to mean produce from such husbandry;
    • "FDRA" to mean the WA Food and Drug Regulatory Agency;
    • "IAO" to mean the WA Independent Adjudicative Office;
    • "WANC" to mean the WA Nautical Commission;
    • "WHAMMO" to mean the WA Waterbody Health and Mitigation Management Organisation;
    • References to "WA organs" refer to FDRA, WANC and WHAMMO;
    • References to "such as" are merely as examples only;
  2. Requires WHAMMO to:
    • Develop regulations for mitigating the negative impacts of aquaculture, such as eutrophication, a buildup of excess nutrients, wastes in ecosystems, and other issues of concern, both to the WA state where the aquaculture takes place and any WA state sharing maritime borders or bodies of water with the said WA state, relevant to each state's physical and technological conditions;
    • Fund research into improving sustainable aquaculture practices, such as feedstock for farmed fish, reduced use of antibiotics, disposal of effluents, and other matters of concern to the aquaculture industry;
  3. Requires FDRA to:
    • Develop regulations on safety levels on consuming aquaculture products, such as levels of pesticides and other chemicals in the products, that are tailored for all of the different sapient species inhabiting each WA state, and conduct ongoing tests from time to time on aquaculture products from each WA state to ensure that all WA states that engage in aquaculture meet all applicable regulations, whether such regulations are domestic or from WA organs;
    • Develop regulations for labelling of aquaculture products (and to distinguish such products from wild-caught seafood, if applicable, as well as any products that are partially developed through husbandry), tailored for different sapient species in terms of origin nutrition, health benefits and potential risks of consuming aquaculture products, and for all such labels to be displayed prominently on or accompanying aquaculture produce either (1) sold within any WA state or (2) exported from any WA state;
  4. Requires WANC to:
    • WANC to develop regulations, based on the geographic features of locations where aquaculture takes place, to ensure that they are properly marked and do not impede maritime navigation;
    • Provide advice to all WA states on security measures for aquaculture facilities;
  5. Requires that all WA states that engage in aquaculture implement regulations specific to the physical characteristics of that WA state that:
    • Actively minimizes discharge (such as effluent or excess nutrients) into waters, especially waters that are connected to other bodies of water in other WA states, if such discharge is deemed by WHAMMO to be undesirable for the said waters; and
    • Regulate the use of supplies such as feed, chemicals and pesticides (in particular anything that may form residues in aquaculture products) to ensure the provision of healthy products to consumers;
  6. Permits, if a WA state ("requesting state") shares a body of water or a maritime border with a WA state that engages in aquaculture ("responding state"), to expressly request for the responding state to implement measures to ensure that any issues regarding aquaculture in the responding state (such as releasing polluted waters) do not adversely affect bodies of water in the requesting state;
  7. Clarifies that if the requesting state and the responding state fail to come to an agreement on matters related to clause 6, or if there are any disputes regarding decisions by WA organs, the IAO shall adjudicate on a de novo basis.
Note: Only votes from TNP WA nations, NPA personnel, and those on NPA deployments will be counted. If you do not meet these requirements, please add (non-WA) or something of that effect to your vote. If you are on an NPA deployment without being formally registered as an NPA member, name your deployed nation in your vote.
Voting Instructions:
  • Vote For if you want the Delegate to vote For the resolution.
  • Vote Against if you want the Delegate to vote Against the resolution.
  • Vote Abstain if you want the Delegate to abstain from voting on this resolution.
  • Vote Present if you are personally abstaining from this vote.
Detailed opinions with your vote are appreciated and encouraged!


ForAgainstAbstainPresent
18000
 
Last edited:
Overview
The resolution at vote regulates aquaculture - that is, husbandry of seafood - especially when in bodies of water that are shared between World Assembly (WA) member states, e.g. the Great Lakes between a NationStates version of the United States and Canada, rivers that flow through multiple WA member states. This is a topic that has never been touched by past authors: the WA has had regulations on fishing - of wild fish - and farming of animals, but not farming of fish.

Additionally, the resolution provides a mechanism for disputes to be escalated to the WA in case of arguments between WA member states.

Recommendation
The resolution at vote hands regulatory powers to various existing WA agencies to develop detailed regulations that are arguably too detailed for the WA to define, largely to fill various gaps between existing resolutions in the "environment - agriculture" and "environment - fishing" categories. We believe this is a sensible move to plug an existing regulatory gap.

For the above reason, the Ministry of World Assembly Affairs recommends a vote For the General Assembly Resolution At Vote, "Sustainable Aquaculture Protocols".
 
Last edited:
For as author. Aquaculture is becoming important as humans (and bears) eat more fish. There is a clear difference in nutrient levels between farmed and wild caught fish (such as salmon) and clear labelling laws appear necessary. So it's basically filling a gap in between agriculture and fishing related regulations. (It's actually two categories in NSGA, environment - fishing and environment - agriculuture, and Gensec picked the latter in the end).
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top