[SC - Passed] Injunct Canada

Status
Not open for further replies.
Magecastle

Magecastle

Wolf of the North
Pronouns
He/Him
TNP Nation
Magecastle_Embassy_Building_A5
Discord
red_canine
sc.jpg

Injunct Canada
Category: Injunction | Target: Canada
Proposed by: Fort Concord, Co-authored by: Westinor | Onsite Topic​

The Security Council,

Realizing that this resolution will mark the first Injunction passed by this Council in an effort to ensure the safety of a historically vulnerable region, and to ensure the security of a long-lived native community:

Introducing the region of Canada as a historic group of peaceful nations, gathered in a tranquil and calm community for decades,

Recalling that Canada has never had a nation in the role of Founder and also lacks a Governor, opening the region to a series of vulnerabilities that malicious invaders have tried to exploit throughout history,

Recognizing Canada’s native regime as being led with the assent of the native community by World Assembly Delegate Parkplace and their appointed officers, and decrying any attempts to infiltrate or otherwise subvert their mandate,

Aghast that Canada has been subjected to an assault from invader forces, directly after an occupation of England, which was similarly invaded and later restored to native control,

Believing that the unlawful occupants of Canada intend to permanently annex the region by forcing it to undergo changes placing it under the invaders’ control, denying the native community access to their rightful home and the ability to inhabit it freely,

Opining that the passage of an injunction would make subjecting Canada to invader-imposed changes impossible, therefore rendering a continued occupation of Canada fruitless,

Hoping that the passage of this historic injunction will serve as an insurmountable obstacle and deterrence to the ongoing occupation and eventually lead to the return of native authority to Canada,

Hereby injuncts Canada.
Click to expand...
Note: Only votes from TNP WA nations and NPA personnel will be counted. If you do not meet these requirements, please add (non-WA) or something of that effect to your vote.
Voting Instructions:
  • Vote For if you want the Delegate to vote For the resolution.
  • Vote Against if you want the Delegate to vote Against the resolution.
  • Vote Abstain if you want the Delegate to abstain from voting on this resolution.
  • Vote Present if you are personally abstaining from this vote.
Detailed opinions with your vote are appreciated and encouraged!

ForAgainstAbstainPresent
11101
 
Last edited:
Overview
This proposal marks the first injunction proposed by the Security Council, to ensure the security and safety of Canada, a long-lived, founderless region that has recently been invaded. This proposal seeks to injunct Canada to prevent changes to Canada's status under the new mechanisms introduced.

Recommendation
The Ministry supports the efforts for the natives of Canada to take back power ultimately and resulting in a restoration of the historic community and rightfully placing the region back in the hands of its native populations. For the above reasons, the Ministry of World Assembly Affairs recommends a vote For the at-vote Security Council resolution, "Injunct Canada".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Magecastle:
sc.jpg

Injunct Canada
Category: Injunction | Target: Canada
Proposed by: Fort Concord, Co-authored by: Westinor | Onsite Topic​


Note: Only votes from TNP WA nations and NPA personnel will be counted. If you do not meet these requirements, please add (non-WA) or something of that effect to your vote.
Voting Instructions:
  • Vote For if you want the Delegate to vote For the resolution.
  • Vote Against if you want the Delegate to vote Against the resolution.
  • Vote Abstain if you want the Delegate to abstain from voting on this resolution.
  • Vote Present if you are personally abstaining from this vote.
Detailed opinions with your vote are appreciated and encouraged!

ForAgainstAbstainPresent
11101
Click to expand...
its running now
 
Against. Is it in our interest to help regions or authors who participated in the extortion racket before we have seen sufficient proof of their changed behaviour? Had a native of Canada authored the resolution -- sure, all for. But for now, we should default to voting against any resolution authored by the regions or individuals who signed the admission of wrongdoing unless we are certain to gain more from the transaction, or we have confirmation that they are sincere in their apologies, retractions, and rapprochement, as well as instituting the necessary changes in institutions or leadership to avoid a repetition.
 
Attempted Socialism:
Against. Is it in our interest to help regions or authors who participated in the extortion racket before we have seen sufficient proof of their changed behaviour? Had a native of Canada authored the resolution -- sure, all for. But for now, we should default to voting against any resolution authored by the regions or individuals who signed the admission of wrongdoing unless we are certain to gain more from the transaction, or we have confirmation that they are sincere in their apologies, retractions, and rapprochement, as well as instituting the necessary changes in institutions or leadership to avoid a repetition.
Click to expand...
"We'd love to help with your agenda in the SC, but unfortunately we were unable to cooperate on other parts of our SC agenda, so we can't make any guarantees that we'll cooperate now."

Against
 
Last edited:
Magecastle:
sc.jpg

Injunct Canada
Category: Injunction | Target: Canada
Proposed by: Fort Concord, Co-authored by: Westinor | Onsite Topic​


Note: Only votes from TNP WA nations and NPA personnel will be counted. If you do not meet these requirements, please add (non-WA) or something of that effect to your vote.
Voting Instructions:
  • Vote For if you want the Delegate to vote For the resolution.
  • Vote Against if you want the Delegate to vote Against the resolution.
  • Vote Abstain if you want the Delegate to abstain from voting on this resolution.
  • Vote Present if you are personally abstaining from this vote.
Detailed opinions with your vote are appreciated and encouraged!

ForAgainstAbstainPresent
11101
Click to expand...
For
 
Against.
Actions must have consequences.
 
Voting against this resolution (which is, incidentally, co-authored by Westinor) because Quebecshire's name is on it is just as short-sighted as the threats and the response to them that we have been talking about for so long. Canada has a password on it, and the raiders in control of it including BoM and TBH would happily destroy it if they could; placing a slight by a leader of a region that is still far closer to us (and that has actually apologized) above the actual, current destructive actions of our enemies is nonsense. I am completely for this resolution.

(Everything I say is just my personal opinion.)
 
Canada didn't extort us, and has maintained cordial relations with us for many years. I would support this resolution regardless of who proposed it. However I don't have a vote at this time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top