[SC - AT VOTE - AGAINST] Condemn Thaecia

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hulldom

Hulldom

Winter Kingdom
-
Pronouns
He/Him/His
TNP Nation
Boston Castle
Discord
seathestarlesssky
sc.jpg

Condemn Thaecia
Category: Condemnation | Target: Thaecia
Proposed by: New Burnet | Onsite Topic​

The Security Council,

Noting the corrupt and power abusing region of Thaecia;

Understanding that status should not replace law and order;

Detests Thaecia's protection of far-left ideologies while attacking anything that is close to right wing;

Disgusted by Thaecia's leaders abusing their power and breaking their own rules, all while severely punishing those of lesser status who even think about it;

Abhors Thaecia's putting their own nations into other region's positions to get their way;

Terrified of Thaecia's continuous hunting of any region that disagrees with them;

Seeks to warn Thaecia that they aren't all powerful, and that status should not prevent you from following rules;

Hereby condemns Thaecia.
Click to expand...
Note: Only votes from TNP WA nations and NPA personnel will be counted. If you do not meet these requirements, please add (non-WA) or something of that effect to your vote.
Voting Instructions:
  • Vote For if you want the Delegate to vote For the resolution.
  • Vote Against if you want the Delegate to vote Against the resolution.
  • Vote Abstain if you want the Delegate to abstain from voting on this resolution.
  • Vote Present if you are personally abstaining from this vote.
Detailed opinions with your vote are appreciated and encouraged!
[TR][TD] For [/TD][TD] Against [/TD][TD] Abstain [/TD][TD] Present [/TD][/TR][TR][TD]0[/TD][TD]11[/TD][TD]0[/TD][TD]1[/TD][/TR]
 
Last edited:
IFV
Overview
This proposal seeks to condemn Thaecia for a variety of reasons. However, the arguments for condemnation boil down to ideological discrimination on part of Thaecian administration against right-wing officials and a perceived bullying of regions which disagree with them.

Recommendation
To put it succinctly and kindly, this proposal is a joke. It spells out grievances without elaborating as to why those grievances are worthy of the badge. The author presupposes that the reader will simply know about Thaecia's exploits in, for instance, "protecti[ng] of far-left ideologies while attacking anything that is close to right wing". We find it ludicrous that we should. The author does not make their case. The arguments presented are preposterous for the reason that they are scurrilous and, of course, untrue, that makes it all the easier to reject any notion we could support it.

For the above reasons, the Ministry of World Assembly Affairs recommends a vote Against the Security Council Resolution at vote, "Condemn Thaecia".
 
Last edited:
DGES:
lame

"Commend Fortnite Battle Royale" was funnier
Click to expand...
[I'm convinced this could make it to queue and that Brototh would have the judgment to pull that one. Really the only reason this thread exists and one on that doesn't.]
 
This proposal has received the necessary approvals to enter the formal queue. Barring it being withdrawn or marked illegal, it will proceed to a vote at Minor Update on Friday, September 10.
 
Thaecia's protection of far-left ideologies while attacking anything that is close to right wing;
Click to expand...

I think the author meant to commend Thaecia instead, how could you condemn such based actions?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top