[SC - MISSED QUORUM] Declaration of Neutrality

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hulldom

Winter Kingdom
-
Pronouns
He/Him/His
TNP Nation
Boston Castle
Discord
seathestarlesssky
sc.jpg

Declaration Of Neutrality
Category: Declaration
Proposed by: Phyr | Onsite Topic

The World Assembly Security Council,

Recognizing our body has an important role in the conflict between raiders (or invaders), defenders, independents, and natives,

Noting the World Assembly Security Council has the power to impact invasions through liberations, and has most often used this power to protect native populations from hostile invaders attempting to become the region’s founder, but has in a few circumstances the World Assembly Security Council has taken the opposite stance and made it easier for a region to be invaded,

Recalling that some nations have asserted the act of invading or raiding is immoral or wrong despite the history of this body’s endorsement of such actions, and further recalling that this has led to the vilification of nations and regions that engage in even harmless invasions,

Understanding either because nations come together within their community to overcome the temporary setback, or because nations are exposed to the possibility of raiding or defending, often raids lead to a higher level of engagement and a more productive international or interregional community,

Seeking to clarify the status of raiding and defending in the eyes of this great body, and reaffirm the time honored tradition of World Assembly neutrality and fairness to all nations and regions,

Proclaims that all alignments (defender, raider, independent, imperialist, neutral, pacifist, etc) are valid and not necessarily moral or immoral, but that the facts and circumstances of each diplomatic incident between sovereign regions must be analyzed to determine if a conflict is harmful or beneficial to any region or the world as a whole,

Declares that this body does not prefer defending to raiding or to any other alignment but rather takes a neutral stance between factions, and takes action when specific facts or circumstances merit interference or recognition,

Denounces the vilification of all invader, raider, imperialist, or independent regions or nations simply because of an identification rather than a thoughtful analysis regarding the specific invasions or raids the nation participated in or lead and how those events impacted the world.
Note: Only votes from TNP WA nations and NPA personnel will be counted. If you do not meet these requirements, please add (non-WA) or something of that effect to your vote.
Voting Instructions:
  • Vote For if you want the Delegate to vote For the resolution.
  • Vote Against if you want the Delegate to vote Against the resolution.
  • Vote Abstain if you want the Delegate to abstain from voting on this resolution.
  • Vote Present if you are personally abstaining from this vote.
Detailed opinions with your vote are appreciated and encouraged!

[TR][TD] For [/TD][TD]Against[/TD][TD] Abstain [/TD][TD] Present [/TD][/TR][TR][TD]1[/TD][TD]7[/TD][TD]0[/TD][TD]0[/TD][/TR]
 
Last edited:
Against. Like, really?

Recognizing our body has an important role in the conflict between raiders (or invaders), defenders, independents, and natives,
...interesting phrasing.

Noting the World Assembly Security Council has the power to impact invasions through liberations, and has most often used this power to protect native populations from hostile invaders attempting to become the region’s founder, but has in a few circumstances the World Assembly Security Council has taken the opposite stance and made it easier for a region to be invaded,
Yes. Raiders attempt to seize control of founder nations. Because raiders mostly target UCRs with active founders. And liberations prevent raiders from taking control of founder nations.

Recalling that some nations have asserted the act of invading or raiding is immoral or wrong despite the history of this body’s endorsement of such actions, and further recalling that this has led to the vilification of nations and regions that engage in even harmless invasions,
Blerg?

Understanding either because nations come together within their community to overcome the temporary setback, or because nations are exposed to the possibility of raiding or defending, often raids lead to a higher level of engagement and a more productive international or interregional community,
...

Seeking to clarify the status of raiding and defending in the eyes of this great body, and reaffirm the time honored tradition of World Assembly neutrality and fairness to all nations and regions,
......

Proclaims that all alignments (defender, raider, independent, imperialist, neutral, pacifist, etc) are valid and not necessarily moral or immoral, but that the facts and circumstances of each diplomatic incident between sovereign regions must be analyzed to determine if a conflict is harmful or beneficial to any region or the world as a whole,
.........

Declares that this body does not prefer defending to raiding or to any other alignment but rather takes a neutral stance between factions, and takes action when specific facts or circumstances merit interference or recognition,
............

Denounces the vilification of all invader, raider, imperialist, or independent regions or nations simply because of an identification rather than a thoughtful analysis regarding the specific invasions or raids the nation participated in or lead and how those events impacted the world.
...............
 
This proposal has failed to achieve the necessary approvals needed to enter the formal queue, as such it has dropped out. Thread locked accordingly.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top